Multiple intelligences of chinese gifted students in hong kong: Perspectives from students, parents, teachers, and peers

Roeper Review

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 18-24

  Chan, David W ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007781957     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190409554284     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
2. Borland, J. H. (1978). Teacher identification of the gifted: A new look. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 22-32.
3. Callahan, C. M. (1996). A critical self-study of gifted education: Healthy practice, necessary evil, or sedition? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 148-163.
4. Campbell, L., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (1999). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Chan, D. W. (2000). Learning and teaching through the multiple-intelligences perspective: Implications for curriculum reform in Hong Kong. Educational Research Journal, 15, 187-201.
6. Chan, D. W. (2001). Assessing giftedness of Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: A multiple intelligences perspective. High Ability Studies, 12, 215-234.
7. Chan, D. W. (2003). Adjustment problems and multiple intelligences among gifted students in Hong Kong: The development of the revised Student Adjustment Problems Inventory. High Ability Studies, 14, 41-54.
8. Chen, J., & Gardner, H. (1997). Alternative assessment from a multiple intelligences theoretical perspective. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 105-121). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Denton, C., & Postlethwaite, K. (1984). A study of the effectiveness of teacher-based identification of pupils with high ability in the secondary school. Gifted Education International, 2, 100-106.
10. Fasko, D. Jr. (2001). An analysis of multiple intelligences theory and its use with the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 23, 126-130.
11. Friedman, P. G., Jenkins-Friedman, R., & Van Dyke, M. (1984). Identifying the leadership gifted: Self, peer, or teacher nominations? Roeper Review, 7, 91-94.
12. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: BasicBooks.
13. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: BasicBooks.
14. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: BasicBooks.
15. Gear, G. (1976). Accuracy of teacher judgment in identifying intellectually gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 478-489.
16. Gear, G. (1978). Effects of training on teachers' accuracy in the identification of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 90-97.
17. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Guskin, S. L., Peng, C. Y. J., & Simon, M. (1992). Do teachers react to –Multiple Intelligences—? Effects of teachers' stereotypes on judgments and expectancies for students with diverse patterns of giftedness/talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 32-37.
19. Hong Kong Education Commission. (1990). Education Commission Report No. 4. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.
20. Hong Kong Education Department. (1986). Hong Kong supplement to guide to the Standard Progressive Matrices. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.
21. Hong Kong Education Department. (2000). Gifted education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Special Educational Needs Section, Curriculum Development Institute, Hong Kong.
22. Karolyi, C. V., Ramos-Ford, V., & Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple intelligences: A perspective on giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. David (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 100-112). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
23. Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1983). Let's cut out the cut-off score in the identification of the gifted. Roeper Review, 5, 6- 9.
24. Kornhaber, M., Krechevsky, M., & Gardner, H. (1990). Engaging intelligence. Educational Psychologist, 25, 177-199.
25. Maker, C. J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problem-solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 4-19.
26. Pegnato, C. W., & Birch, J. W. (1959). Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children, 25, 300-304.
27. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 161-169.
28. Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults: Their development and education (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
29. Psychological Corporation. (1981). Hong Kong Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children manual. New York: Author.
30. Raven, J., Raven, J. C, & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scale. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press.
31. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 18-24.
32. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Richert, E. S. (2003). Excellence with justice in identification and programming. In N. Colangelo & G. A. David (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3Id ed., pp. 146-158). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
34. Rimm, S. B. (1984). The characteristics approach: Identification and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 181-187.
35. Sabatella, M. L. (2003). Role of programs: Relationships with parents, schools, and communities. In J. F. Smutny (Ed.), Designing and developing programs for gifted students (pp. 119-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
36. Sarouphim, K. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 244-251.
37. Skinner, H. A. (1978). Differentiating the contribution of elevation, scatter and shape in profile similarity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 297-308.
38. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-243). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). A triarchic view of giftedness: Theory and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 43-53). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
40. Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Patterns of giftedness: A triarchic analysis. Roeper Review, 22, 231-235.
41. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
42. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 27-42). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
43. Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Walters, J., & Gardner, H. (1986). The theory of multiple intelligences: Some issues and answers. In R. J. Sternberg & R. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligences (pp. 163-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Winner, E. (2000). Giftedness: Current theory and research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 153-156.