Structural and Functional Characterization of the Bacterial Type III Secretion Export Apparatus

PLoS Pathogens

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2016, Pages

  Dietsche, Tobias ^a   Tesfazgi Mebrhatu, Mehari ^a   Brunner, Matthias J ^b,c,d   Abrusci, Patrizia ^e   Yan, Jun ^f,j   Franz Wachtel, Mirita ^a   Schärfe, Charlotta ^a   Zilkenat, Susann ^a   Grin, Iwan ^a   Galán, Jorge E ^g   Kohlbacher, Oliver ^a,h   Lea, Susan ^e   Macek, Boris ^a   Marlovits, Thomas C ^b,c,d   Robinson, Carol V ^f   Wagner, Samuel ^a,i  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c Vienna Biocenter   (Austria)

^d RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY   (Austria)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^g YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Germany)

ⁱ German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF)   (Germany)

^j NOVO NORDISK A S   (Denmark)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MODEL; PERIPLASM; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SECRETORY PATHWAY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMMUNOBLOTTING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM; SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY; TYPE III SECRETION SYSTEM; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

TYPE III SECRETION SYSTEM;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOBLOTTING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; TYPE III SECRETION SYSTEMS;

EID: 85007524055     PISSN: 15537366     EISSN: 15537374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006071     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Galán JE, Lara-Tejero M, Marlovits TC, Wagner S, Bacterial type III secretion systems: specialized nanomachines for protein delivery into target cells. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014;68: 415–;438. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-15572525002086
2. Galán JE, SnapShot: effector proteins of type III secretion systems. Cell. 2007;130: 192–;192.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.04217632065
3. Schraidt O, Marlovits TC, Three-dimensional model of Salmonella's needle complex at subnanometer resolution. Science. 2011;331: 1192–;1195. doi: 10.1126/science.119935821385715
4. Kubori T, Matsushima Y, Nakamura D, Uralil J, Lara-Tejero M, Sukhan A, et al. Supramolecular structure of the Salmonella typhimurium type III protein secretion system. Science. 1998;280: 602–;605. 9554854
5. Radics J, Königsmaier L, Marlovits TC, Structure of a pathogenic type 3 secretion system in action. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21: 82–;87. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.272224317488
6. Akeda Y, Galán JE, Chaperone release and unfolding of substrates in type III secretion. Nature. 2005;437: 911–;915. doi: 10.1038/nature0399216208377
7. Lara-Tejero M, Kato J, Wagner S, Liu X, Galán JE, A sorting platform determines the order of protein secretion in bacterial type III systems. Science. 2011;331: 1188–;1191. doi: 10.1126/science.120147621292939
8. Fan F, Ohnishi K, Francis NR, Macnab RM, The FliP and FliR proteins of Salmonella typhimurium, putative components of the type III flagellar export apparatus, are located in the flagellar basal body. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26: 1035–;1046. 9426140
9. Wagner S, Königsmaier L, Lara-Tejero M, Lefebre M, Marlovits TC, Galán JE, Organization and coordinated assembly of the type III secretion export apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107: 17745–;17750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100805310720876096
10. Burkinshaw BJ, Strynadka NCJ, Assembly and structure of the T3SS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843: 1649–;1663. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.01.03524512838
11. Abrusci P, McDowell MA, Lea SM, Johnson S, Building a secreting nanomachine: a structural overview of the T3SS. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;25: 111–;117.
12. Zilkenat S, Franz-Wachtel M, Stierhof Y-D, Galán JE, Macek B, Wagner S, Determination of the stoichiometry of the complete bacterial type III secretion needle complex using a combined quantitative proteomic approach. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2016;15: 1598–;1609.
13. Zarivach R, Deng W, Vuckovic M, Felise HB, Nguyen HV, Miller SI, et al. Structural analysis of the essential self-cleaving type III secretion proteins EscU and SpaS. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2008;453: 124–;127.
14. Worrall LJ, Vuckovic M, Strynadka NCJ, Crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of the Salmonella type III secretion system export apparatus protein InvA. Protein Sci. 2010;19: 1091–;1096. doi: 10.1002/pro.38220306492
15. Abrusci P, Vergara-Irigaray M, Johnson S, Beeby MD, Hendrixson DR, Roversi P, et al. Architecture of the major component of the type III secretion system export apparatus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;20: 99–;104. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.245223222644
16. Hirano T, Mizuno S, Aizawa S-I, Hughes KT, Mutations in flk, flgG, flhA, and flhE that affect the flagellar type III secretion specificity switch in Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol. 2009;191: 3938–;3949. doi: 10.1128/JB.01811-0819376867
17. Minamino T, Shimada M, Okabe M, Saijo-Hamano Y, Imada K, Kihara M, et al. Role of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of FlhA in bacterial flagellar type III protein export. J Bacteriol. American Society for Microbiology; 2010;192: 1929–;1936.
18. Hara N, Namba K, Minamino T, Genetic characterization of conserved charged residues in the bacterial flagellar type III export protein FlhA. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e22417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.002241721811603
19. Ferris HU, Minamino T, Flipping the switch: bringing order to flagellar assembly. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14: 519–;526. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.10.00617067800
20. Monjarás Feria JV, Lefebre MD, Stierhof Y-D, Galán JE, Wagner S, Role of autocleavage in the function of a type III secretion specificity switch protein in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. MBio. American Society for Microbiology; 2015;6: e01459–;15.
21. Diepold A, Wiesand U, Cornelis GR, The assembly of the export apparatus (YscR,S,T,U,V) of the Yersinia type III secretion apparatus occurs independently of other structural components and involves the formation of an YscV oligomer. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82: 502–;514. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07830.x21923772
22. Yerushalmi G, Litvak Y, Gur-Arie L, Rosenshine I, Dynamics of expression and maturation of the type III secretion system of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2014;196: 2798–;2806. doi: 10.1128/JB.00069-1424837293
23. Diepold A, Wagner S, Assembly of the bacterial type III secretion machinery. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38: 802–;822. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.1206124484471
24. Collazo CM, Galan JE, Requirement for exported proteins in secretion through the invasion-associated type III system of Salmonella typhimurium. Infection and Immunity. 1996;64: 3524–;3531. 8751894
25. Farrell IS, Toroney R, Hazen JL, Mehl RA, Chin JW, Photo-cross-linking interacting proteins with a genetically encoded benzophenone. Nat Methods. 2005;2: 377–;384. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0505-37716170867
26. Marks DS, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Hopf TA, Pagnani A, Zecchina R, et al. Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. Sali A, editor. PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science; 2011;6: e28766.
27. Morcos F, Pagnani A, Lunt B, Bertolino A, Marks DS, Sander C, et al. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. National Acad Sciences; 2011;108: E1293–;301.
28. Hopf TA, Schärfe CPI, Rodrigues JPGLM, Green AG, Kohlbacher O, Sander C, et al. Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes. Elife. 2014;3: 65.
29. Park E, Rapoport TA, Preserving the membrane barrier for small molecules during bacterial protein translocation. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;473: 239–;242.
30. Marlovits TC, Kubori T, Sukhan A, Thomas DR, Galán JE, Unger VM, Structural insights into the assembly of the type III secretion needle complex. Science. 2004;306: 1040–;1042. doi: 10.1126/science.110261015528446
31. Van Arnam JS, McMurry JL, Kihara M, Macnab RM, Analysis of an engineered Salmonella flagellar fusion protein, FliR-FlhB. J Bacteriol. 2004;186: 2495–;2498. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.8.2495-2498.200415060055
32. Marlovits TC, Kubori T, Lara-Tejero M, Thomas D, Unger VM, Galán JE, Assembly of the inner rod determines needle length in the type III secretion injectisome. Nature. 2006;441: 637–;640. doi: 10.1038/nature0482216738660
33. Lefebre MD, Lefebre MD, Galan JE, Galán JE, The inner rod protein controls substrate switching and needle length in a Salmonella type III secretion system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111: 817–;822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.131969811124379359
34. Ohnishi K, Fan F, Schoenhals GJ, Kihara M, Macnab RM, The FliO, FliP, FliQ, and FliR proteins of Salmonella typhimurium: putative components for flagellar assembly. J Bacteriol. 1997;179: 6092–;6099. 9324257
35. Berger C, Robin GP, Bonas U, Koebnik R, Membrane topology of conserved components of the type III secretion system from the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Microbiology (Reading, Engl). 2010;156: 1963–;1974.
36. Allaoui A, Woestyn S, Sluiters C, Cornelis GR, YscU, a Yersinia enterocolitica inner membrane protein involved in Yop secretion. J Bacteriol. 1994;176: 4534–;4542. 8045883
37. Hoiseth SK, Stocker BA, Aromatic-dependent Salmonella typhimurium are non-virulent and effective as live vaccines. Nature. 1981;291: 238–;239. 7015147
38. Folta-Stogniew E, Oligomeric states of proteins determined by size-exclusion chromatography coupled with light scattering, absorbance, and refractive index detectors. Methods Mol Biol. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2006;328: 97–;112.
39. Pringle SD, Giles K, Wildgoose JL, Williams JP, Slade SE, Thalassinos K, et al. An investigation of the mobility separation of some peptide and protein ions using a new hybrid quadrupole/travelling wave IMS/oa-ToF instrument. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2007;261: 1–;12.
40. Hernández H, Robinson CV, Determining the stoichiometry and interactions of macromolecular assemblies from mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc. 2007;2: 715–;726. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.7317406634
41. Tsirigos KD, Peters C, Shu N, Käll L, Elofsson A, The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. Oxford University Press; 2015;43: W401–;7.
42. Hessa T, Meindl-Beinker NM, Bernsel A, Kim H, Sato Y, Lerch-Bader M, et al. Molecular code for transmembrane-helix recognition by the Sec61 translocon. Nature. 2007;450: 1026–;1030. doi: 10.1038/nature0638718075582
43. Omasits U, Ahrens CH, Müller S, Wollscheid B, Protter: interactive protein feature visualization and integration with experimental proteomic data. Bioinformatics. Oxford University Press; 2014;30: 884–;886.
44. Borchert N, Dieterich C, Krug K, Schütz W, Jung S, Nordheim A, et al. Proteogenomics of Pristionchus pacificus reveals distinct proteome structure of nematode models. Genome Res. Cold Spring Harbor Lab; 2010;20: 837–;846.
45. Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y, Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc. Nature Publishing Group; 2007;2: 1896–;1906.
46. Franz-Wachtel M, Eisler SA, Krug K, Wahl S, Carpy A, Nordheim A, et al. Global detection of protein kinase D-dependent phosphorylation events in nocodazole-treated human cells. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; 2012;11: 160–;170.
47. Cox J, Mann M, MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. Nature Publishing Group; 2008;26: 1367–;1372.
48. Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A, Scheltema RA, Olsen JV, Mann M, Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res. American Chemical Society; 2011;10: 1794–;1805.
49. Carpy A, Krug K, Graf S, Koch A, Popic S, Hauf S, et al. Absolute proteome and phosphoproteome dynamics during the cell cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Fission Yeast). Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; 2014;13: 1925–;1936.
50. Balakrishnan S, Kamisetty H, Carbonell JG, Lee S-I, Langmead CJ, Learning generative models for protein fold families. Proteins. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company; 2011;79: 1061–;1078.
51. Ekeberg M, Lövkvist C, Lan Y, Weigt M, Aurell E, Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. American Physical Society; 2013;87: 012707.
52. Kamisetty H, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D, Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. National Acad Sciences; 2013;110: 15674–;15679.
53. Johnson LS, Eddy SR, Portugaly E, Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinformatics. BioMed Central; 2010;11: 431.
54. Suzek BE, Wang Y, Huang H, McGarvey PB, Wu CH, UniProt ConsortiumUniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics. Oxford University Press; 2015;31: 926–;932.
55. Perez F, Granger BE, IPython: A system for interactive scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9: 21–;29.
56. Suloway C, Pulokas J, Fellmann D, Cheng A, Guerra F, Quispe J, et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J Struct Biol. 2005;151: 41–;60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.03.01015890530
57. Tang G, Peng L, Baldwin PR, Mann DS, Jiang W, Rees I, et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 2007;157: 38–;46. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.00916859925
58. Sorzano COS, Marabini R, Velázquez-Muriel J, Bilbao-Castro JR, Scheres SHW, Carazo JM, et al. XMIPP: a new generation of an open-source image processing package for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 2004;148: 194–;204. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2004.06.00615477099