Current methods of haemolysis detection and reporting as a source of risk to patient safety: A narrative review

Clinical Biochemist Reviews

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 143-151

  McCaughey, Euan J ^a   Vecellio, Elia ^a,b   Lake, Rebecca ^a   Li, Ling ^a   Burnett, Leslie ^b,c,d   Chesher, Douglas ^c,d   Braye, Stephen ^c,e   Mackay, Mark ^c,f   Gay, Stephanie ^f   Badrick, Tony C ^f   Westbrook, Johanna I ^a   Georgiou, Andrew ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c ROYAL NORTH SHORE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^e NSW Health Pathology   (Australia)

^f Level 2   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007504676     PISSN: 01598090     EISSN: 18380212     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Franco RS. The measurement and importance of red cell survival. Am J Hematol 2009;84:109-14.
2. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem 2007;53:1338-42.
3. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, et al. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:764-72.
4. Šimundic A-M, Topic E, Nikolac N, Lippi G. Hemolysis detection and management of hemolyzed specimens. Biochem Med 2010;20:154-9.
5. Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2011;48:143-53.
6. Sodi R, Darn SM, Davison AS, Stott A, Shenkin A. Mechanism of interference by haemolysis in the cardiac troponin T immunoassay. Ann Clin Biochem 2006;43:49-56.
7. Green SF. The cost of poor blood specimen quality and errors in preanalytical processes. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1175-9.
8. Kim JY, Kamis IK, Singh B, Batra S, Dixon RH, Dighe AS. Implementation of computerized add-on testing for hospitalized patients in a large academic medical center. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:845-50.
9. Georgiou A, Williamson M, Westbrook JI, Ray S. The impact of computerised physician order entry systems on pathology services: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:514-29.
10. Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2002;48:691-8.
11. Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:358-65.
12. Foley M, Kifaieh N, Mallon WK. Financial impact of emergency department crowding. West J Emerg Med 2011;12:192-7.
13. Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, Chen W, de Oliveira Galoro CA, Escuer MI, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:951-8.
14. Dolci A, Panteghini M. Harmonization of automated hemolysis index assessment and use: Is it possible? Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:38-43.
15. Lippi G, Luca Salvagno G, Blanckaert N, Giavarina D, Green S, Kitchen S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the hemolysis index in automated clinical chemistry systems. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:934-9.
16. Šimundic A-M, Nikolac N, Ivankovic V, Ferenec-Ruzic D, Magdic B, Kvaternik M, et al. Comparison of visual vs. automated detection of lipemic, icteric and hemolyzed specimens: can we rely on a human eye? Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1361-5.
17. Dietrich H. One poke or two: can intravenous catheters provide an acceptable blood sample? A data set presentation, review of previous data sets, and discussion. J Emerg Nurs 2014;40:575-8.
18. Lippi G, Cervellin G, Favaloro EJ, Plebani M. In Vitro and In Vivo Hemolysis-An Unresolved Dispute in Laboratory Medicine. Germany: De Gruyter; 2012.
19. Koseoglu M, Hur A, Atay A, Cuhadar S. Effects of hemolysis interferences on routine biochemistry parameters. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2011;21:79-85.
20. Errico MK, Iovane B, Bernardini A, Gliati D, Scarabello C, Fainardi V, et al. Haemolysis during diabetic ketoacidosis treatment in two girls with incomplete glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Acta Biomed 2009;80:69-72.
21. Carraro P, Zago T, Plebani M. Exploring the initial steps of the testing process: frequency and nature of prepreanalytic errors. Clin Chem 2012;58:638-42.
22. Cox SR, Dages JH, Jarjoura D, Hazelett S. Blood samples drawn from IV catheters have less hemolysis when 5-mL (vs 10-mL) collection tubes are used. J Emerg Nurs 2004;30:529-33.
23. Bölenius K, Söderberg J, Hultdin J, Lindkvist M, Brulin C, Grankvist K. Minor improvement of venous blood specimen collection practices in primary health care after a large-scale educational intervention. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:303-10.
24. Wollowitz A, Bijur PE, Esses D, John Gallagher E. Use of butterfly needles to draw blood is independently associated with marked reduction in hemolysis compared to intravenous catheter. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20:1151-5.
25. Dugan L, Leech L, Speroni KG, Corriher J. Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood samples drawn from newly placed IV sites in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2005;31:338-45.
26. Atay A, Demir L, Cuhadar S, Saglam G, Unal H, Aksun S, et al. Clinical biochemistry laboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalytical errors. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:376-82.
27. Grant MS. The effect of blood drawing techniques and equipment on the hemolysis of ED laboratory blood samples. J Emerg Nurs 2003;29:116-21.
28. Stauss M, Sherman B, Pugh L, Parone D, Looby-Rodriguez K, Bell A, et al. Hemolysis of coagulation specimens: a comparative study of intravenous draw methods. J Emerg Nurs 2012;38:15-21.
29. Berger-Achituv S, Budde-Schwartzman B, Ellis MH, Shenkman Z, Erez I. Blood sampling through peripheral venous catheters is reliable for selected basic analytes in children. Pediatrics 2010;126:e179-86.
30. Lowe G, Stike R, Pollack M, Bosley J, O'Brien P, Hake A, et al. Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques. J Emerg Nurs 2008;34:26-32.
31. Ellis G. An episode of increased hemolysis due to a defective pneumatic air tube delivery system. Clin Biochem 2009;42:1265-9.
32. Ortells-Abuye N, Busquets-Puigdevall T, Díaz-Bergara M, Paguina-Marcos M, Sánchez-Pérez I. A crosssectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004250.
33. Ong ME, Chan YH, Lim CS. Reducing blood sample hemolysis at a tertiary hospital emergency department. Am J Med 2009;122:1054.e1-6.
34. Dwyer DG, Fry M, Somerville A, Holdgate A. Randomized, single blinded control trial comparing haemolysis rate between two cannula aspiration techniques. Emerg Med Australas 2006;18:484-8.
35. Kara H, Bayir A, Ak A, Degirmenci S, Akinci M, Agacayak A, et al. Hemolysis associated with pneumatic tube system transport for blood samples. Pak J Med Sci 2014;30:50-8.
36. Lippi G, Avanzini P, Aloe R, Cervellin G. Blood collection from intravenous lines: is one drawing site better than others? Lab Med 2014;45:172-5.
37. Munnix IC, Schellart M, Gorissen C, Kleinveld HA. Factors reducing hemolysis rates in blood samples from the emergency department. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:157-8.
38. Saleem S, Mani V, Chadwick MA, Creanor S, Ayling RM. A prospective study of causes of haemolysis during venepuncture: tourniquet time should be kept to a minimum. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:244-6.
39. Shah KG, Idrovo JP, Nicastro J, McMullen HF, Molmenti EP, Coppa G. A retrospective analysis of the incidence of hemolysis in type and screen specimens from trauma patients. Int J Angiol 2009;18:182-3.
40. Fang L, Fang S-H, Chung Y-H, Chien S-T. Collecting factors related to the haemolysis of blood specimens. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:2343-51.
41. Tanabe P, Kyriacou DN, Garland F. Factors affecting the risk of blood bank specimen hemolysis. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:897-900.
42. Ong ME, Chan YH, Lim CS. Observational study to determine factors associated with blood sample haemolysis in the emergency department. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008;37:745-8.
43. Fernandes CM, Worster A, Hill S, McCallum C, Eva K. Root cause analysis of laboratory turnaround times for patients in the emergency department. CJEM 2004;6:116-22.
44. Giménez-Marín A, Rivas-Ruiz F, Pérez-Hidalgo MDELM, Molina-Mendoza P. Pre-analytical errors management in the clinical laboratory: a five-year study. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:248-57.
45. Grecu DS, Vlad DC, Dumitrascu V. Quality indicators in the preanalytical phase of testing in a stat laboratory. Lab Med 2014;45:74-81.
46. Brunel V, Larson T, Peschanski N, Cauliez B. Evaluation of haemolysis in emergency department samples requesting high sensitivity troponin T measurement. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:509-10.
47. Berg JE, Ahee P, Berg JD. Variation in phlebotomy techniques in emergency medicine and the incidence of haemolysed samples. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:562-5.
48. Alsina MJ, Alvarez V, Barba N, Bullich S, Cortés M, Escoda I, et al. Preanalytical quality control program-an overview of results (20012005 summary). Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:849-54.
49. Burns ER, Yoshikawa N. Hemolysis in serum samples drawn by emergency department personnel versus laboratory phlebotomists. Lab Med 2002;33:378-80.
50. Carraro P, Servidio G, Plebani M. Hemolyzed specimens: a reason for rejection or a clinical challenge? Clin Chem 2000;46:306-7.
51. Davidson DF. A survey of some pre-analytical errors identified from the Biochemistry Department of a Scottish hospital. Scott Med J 2014;59:91-4.
52. Fernandez P, Llopis MA, Perich C, Alsina MJ, Alvarez V, Biosca C, et al. Harmonization in hemolysis detection and prevention. A working group of the Catalonian Health Institute (ICS) experience. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1557-68.
53. Bhat V, Tiwari M, Chavan P, Kelkar R. Analysis of laboratory sample rejections in the pre-analytical stage at an oncology center. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1203-6.
54. Ashakiran S, Sumati ME, Murthy NK. A study of preanalytical variables in clinical biochemistry laboratory. Clin Biochem 2011;44:944-5.
55. Straszewski SM, Sanchez L, McGillicuddy D, Boyd K, Dufresne J, Joyce N, et al. Use of separate venipunctures for IV access and laboratory studies decreases hemolysis rates. Intern Emerg Med 2011;6:357-9.
56. Pretlow L, Gandy T, Leibach EK, Russell B, Kraj B. A quality improvement cycle: hemolyzed specimens in the emergency department. Clin Lab Sci 2008;21:219-24.
57. Lippi G, Bonelli P, Cervellin G. Prevalence and cost of hemolyzed samples in a large urban emergency department. Int J Lab Hematol 2014;36:e24-6.
58. Sinici Lay I, Pinar A, Akbiyik F. Classification of reasons for rejection of biological specimens based on prepreanalytical processes to identify quality indicators at a university hospital clinical laboratory in Turkey. Clin Biochem 2014;47:1002-5.
59. Upreti S, Upreti S, Bansal R, Jeelani N, Bharat V. Types and frequency of preanalytical errors in haematology lab. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2491-3.
60. Chawla R, Goswami B, Tayal D, Mallika V. Identification of the types of preanalytical errors in the clinical chemistry laboratory: 1-Year study at G.B. Pant Hospital. Lab Med 2010;41:89-92.
61. Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Mallika V. Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:63-6.
62. Romero A, Cobos A, López-León A, Ortega G, Muñoz M. Preanalytical mistakes in samples from primary care patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1549-52.
63. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:311-6.
64. Malinauskas RA. Plasma hemoglobin measurement techniques for the in vitro evaluation of blood damage caused by medical devices. Artif Organs 1997;21:1255-67.
65. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess 2010;14:iii,ix-xi,1-193.
66. Söderberg J, Jonsson PA, Wallin O, Grankvist K, Hultdin J. Haemolysis indexan estimate of preanalytical quality in primary health care. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:940-4.
67. Salvagno GL, Lippi G, Bassi A, Poli G, Guidi GC. Prevalence and type of pre-analytical problems for inpatients samples in coagulation laboratory. J Eval Clin Pract 2008;14:351-3.
68. Lippi G, Bassi A, Brocco G, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Guidi GC. Preanalytic error tracking in a laboratory medicine department: results of a 1-year experience. Clin Chem 2006;52:1442-3.
69. Tóth J, Lenkey Á, Voláh A, Köteles J, Kissné Sziráki V, Kerényi A, et al. [Pneumatic tube system for transport of laboratory samples: preanalytical aspects]. (English synopsis provided by Tóth, J. via personal communication: September 2014) Orv Hetil 2014;155:1113-20.
70. Stark A, Jones BA, Chapman D, Well K, Krajenta R, Meier FA, et al. Clinical laboratory specimen rejectionassociation with the site of patient care and patients characteristics: findings from a single health care organization. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:588-92.