A retrospective analysis of the incidence of hemolysis in type and screen specimens from trauma patients

International Journal of Angiology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 182-183

  Shah, Kavin G ^a   Idrovo, Juan P ^a   Nicastro, Jeffrey ^a   McMullen, Heather F ^b   Molmenti, Ernesto P ^a   Coppa, Gene ^a  

^a North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System ^*  (United States)

^b STATEN ISLAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Collection techniques; Hemolysis; Intravenous catheter collection; Venipuncture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; BLOOD SAMPLING; CIRCULATION; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INJURY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKILL; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VASCULAR ACCESS;

EID: 80052981575     PISSN: 10611711     EISSN: 16155939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1278350     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Lowe G, Stike R, Pollack M, et al. Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: Analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques. J Emerg Nurs 2008;34:26-32.
2. Laga AC, Cheves TA, Sweeney JD. The effect of specimen hemolysis on coagulation test results. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;126:748-55. (Pubitemid 44707626)
3. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, et al. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:311-6. (Pubitemid 43357691)
4. Lippi G, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, et al. Interference of blood cell lysis on routine coagulation testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:181-4. (Pubitemid 43237986)
5. Chuang CK, Wang TI, Yeung CY, et al. Interference and blood sample preparation for a pyruvate enzymatic assay. Clin Biochem 2006;39:74-7.
6. Owens H, Siparsky G, Bajai L, et al. Correction of factitious hyperkalemia in hemolyzed specimens. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:872-5. (Pubitemid 41618017)
7. Kwon HI, Seo EI, Min KO. The influence of hemolysis, turbidity and icterus on the measurements of CK-MB, troponin I and myoglobin. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003;41:360-4. (Pubitemid 36432846)
8. Pale JC, Novis DA. Outpatient phlebotomy success and reasons for specimen rejection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:416-9. (Pubitemid 34286804)
9. Kennedy C, Angermuller S, King R, et al. A comparison of hemolysis rates using intravenous catheters versus venipuncture tubes for obtaining blood samples. J Emerg Nurs 1996;22:566-9.
10. Dugan L, Leech L, Speroni KG, et al. Factors affecting hemolysis rates in blood samples drawn from newly placed IV sites in the emergency. J Emerg Nurs 2005;31:338-45. (Pubitemid 41213615)
11. Grant MS. The effect of blood drawing techniques and equipment on hemolysis of ED blood samples. J Emerg Nurs 2003;29:116-21. (Pubitemid 36503941)
12. Burns E, Yoshikawa N. Hemolysis in serum samples drawn by emergency department personnel versus laboratory phlebotomists. Lab Med 2002;33:378-80. (Pubitemid 34457177)