Interventions and assessment tools addressing key concepts people need to know to appraise claims about treatment effects: A systematic mapping review

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Austvoll Dahlgren, Astrid ^a   Nsangi, Allen ^b   Semakula, Daniel ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

^b MAKERERE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Uganda)

Author keywords

Controlled trials; Decision making; Evidence based medicine; Health literacy; Patient education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; AWARENESS; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COST; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; MENTAL HEALTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; COMPREHENSION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE;

EID: 85007437314     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0389-z     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Black WC, Welch HG. Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters. Med Decis Mak. 1999;19(3):221-9.
2. Peterson G, Aslani P, Williams KA. How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the internet A qualitative study using focus groups. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(4):e33.
3. Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris PR, Fishwick L. How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(9):1853-62.
4. Lloyd A. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual Health Care. 2001;10 Suppl 1:i14-8.
5. Weinstein N. What does it mean to understand a risk Evaluating risk comprehension. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;25:15-20.
6. Tickner S, Leman P, Woodcock A. Factors underlying suboptimal childhood immunisation. Vaccine. 2006;24(49-50):7030-6.
7. Robinson E, Kerr C, Stevens A, Lilford R, Braunholtz D, Edwards S, et al. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't. NHS R & D HTA Programme. 2005 Mar. Report No.: 1366-5278 (Linking) Contract No.: 8.
8. Stead M, Eadie D, Gordon D, Angus K. "Hello, hello - it's English I speak"! a qualitative exploration of patients' understanding of the science of clinical trials. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(11):664-9.
9. Glenton C, Nilsen ES, Carlsen B. Lay perceptions of evidence-based information--a qualitative evaluation of a website for back pain sufferers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:34.
10. Schwartz L, Woloshin S, Black W, Welch H. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(11):966-72.
11. Glenton C, Paulsen E, Oxman A. Portals to Wonderland Health portals lead confusing information about the effects of health care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:7-8.
12. Schwartz K, Roe T, Northrup J, Meza J, Seifeldin R, Neale A. Family medicine patients' use of the Internet for health information: a MetroNet study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(1):39-45.
13. Fox S, Jones S. The Social Life of Health Information. PEW Internet and American Life Project [Internet]. 2009. p. 88. www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Information.aspx.
14. Mills E, Jadad AR, Ross C, Wilson K. Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental beliefs and attitudes toward childhood vaccination identifies common barriers to vaccination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(11):1081-8.
15. Ganther-Urmie J, Nair K, Valuck R, McCollum M, Lewis S, Turpin R. Consumer attitudes and factors related to prescription switching decisions in multitier copayment drug benefit plans. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(3):201-8.
16. Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; Issue 1 Art No: CD001431 DOI: 10.1002/14651858CD001431pub4.
17. Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Badenoch D, Atkinson P, Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Oxman A. Evidence Live 2016: promoting informed healthcare choices by helping people assess treatment claims. BMJ. http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/05/26/evidence-live-2016-promotinginformed-healthcare-choices-by-helping-people-assess-treatment-claims/
18. Evans I, Thornton H, Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Testing Treatments: better research for better healthcare. Secondth ed. London: Pinter & Martin Ltd; 2011. http://www.testingtreatments.org/book/.
19. Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM, McDonald KM, Schoelles K, Dy SM, et al. The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 2):365-8.
20. Steinman M. Using patients to promote evidence-based prescribing: comment on "communicating uncertainties about prescription drugs to the public". Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(16):1468-9.
21. Pilling SA, Williams MB, Brackett RH, Gourley R, Weg MW, Christensen AJ, et al. Part I, patient perspective: activating patients to engage their providers in the use of evidence-based medicine: a qualitative evaluation of the VA Project to Implement Diuretics (VAPID). Implement Sci. 2010;5:23.
22. Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Johansen M. The patient as participant and knowledge manager. Nor J Epidemiol. 2013;23(2):225-30.
23. Berkman N, Sheridan S, Donahue K, Halpern D, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97-U89.
24. Jordan J, Osborne R, Buchbinder R. Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):366-79.
25. Car J, Lang B, Colledge A, Ung C, Majeed A. Interventions for enhancing consumers' online health literacy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(6):CD007092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007092.pub2.
26. Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80.
27. Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, et al. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; Issue 3 Art No: CD006776. DOI: 10.1002/14651858CD006776pub2.
28. Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Oxman AD, Chalmers I, Nsangi A, Glenton C, Lewin S, et al. Key concepts that people need to understand to assess claims about treatment effects. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8(3):112-25.
29. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91-108.
30. Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Oxman AD, Chalmers I, Nsangi A, Glenton C, Lewin S, Morelli A, Rosenbaum S, Semakula D, Sewankambo N. Key concepts that people need to understand to assess claims about treatment effects. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:112-5. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12160.
31. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32.
32. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156-65.
33. Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Nsangi A, Semakula D, Oxman A. Measuring peoples' understanding of the effects of treatments: a review of outcome measures. 2015. PROSPERO CRD42015016449. Available from http://wwwcrdyorkacuk/PROSPERO/display_recordaspID=CRD42015016449.
34. Horsley T, Hyde C, Santesso N, Parkes J, Milne R, Stewart R. Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;11:CD001270.
35. Kaelin MA, Huebner WW, Nicolich MJ, Kimbrough ML. Field test of an epidemiology curriculum for middle school students. Am J Health Educ. 2007;38(1):16-31.
36. Leshowitz B, Jenkens K, Heaton S, Bough TL. Fostering critical thinking skills in students with learning disabilities: an instructional program. J Learn Disabil. 1993;26:483-90. doi: 10.1177/002221949302600707.
37. Dinkevich E, Markinson A, Ahsan S, Lawrence B. Effect of a brief intervention on evidence-based medicine skills of pediatric residents. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:1.
38. Vandvik PO, Santesso N, Akl EA, You J, Mulla S, Spencer FA, et al. Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved guideline panelists comprehension and accessibility to information. A randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(7):748-55.
39. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(6):620-6.
40. Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Bjorndal A, Odgaard-Jensen J, Helseth S. Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37715.
41. Milne R, Oliver S. Evidence-based consumer health information: developing teaching in critical appraisal skills. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8(5):439-45.
42. Dickersin K, Braun L, Mead M, Millikan R, Wu AM, Pietenpol J, et al. Development and implementation of a science training course for breast cancer activists: Project LEAD (leadership, education and advocacy development). Health Expect. 2001;4(4):213-20.
43. per J, Mühlhauser I. Ebmat school - a curriculum of critical health literacy for secondary school students: results of a pilot study. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(3):158-65.
44. Ramos KD, Schafer S, Tracz SM. Validation of the Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2003;326(7384):319-21.
45. Godwin M, Seguin R. Critical appraisal skills of family physicians in Ontario. Canada BMC Med Educ. 2003;3:10.
46. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25-30.
47. Cusack L, Hoffmann T, Del Mar C, Chalmers I. Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review protocol PROSPERO. 2016: CRD42016033103. Available from http://wwwcrdyorkacuk/PROSPERO/display_recordaspID=CRD42016033103
48. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71-2.
49. Chalmers I. The development of fair tests of treatments. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1713-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60821-7.
50. Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Danielsen S, Opheim E, Bjorndal A, Reinar LM, Flottorp S, et al. Development of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skills. Health Info Libr J. 2013;30(4):278-93.
51. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2011.
52. Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, Jackson RH, Bates P, George RB, et al. Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Fam Med. 1991;23(6):433-5.
53. Parker R, Baker D, Williams M, Nurss J. The test of functional health literacy in adults. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;21(4):651-7.
54. Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Pelikan J, Fullam J, Doyle G, Slonska Z, et al. Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):948.
55. Osborne R, Batterham R, Elsworth G, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13:658.
56. Ishikawa H, Nomura K, Sato M, Yano E. Developing a measure of communicative and critical health literacy: a pilot study of Japanese office workers. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(3):269-74.
57. Lemke M, Sen A, Pahlke E, Partelow L, Miller D, Williams T, et al. International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results From the U.S. Perspective. (NCES 2005-003). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2004.
58. Wilson MR, Bertenthal MW, editors. BM. Systems for state science assessment. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2005. wwwnapedu.