How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on theinternet? A qualitative study using focus groups

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 109-123

  Peterson, Geraldine ^a   Aslani, Parisa ^a   Williams, Kylie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Consumers; Drugs; Focus groups; Information; Internet; Medicines; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONSUMER; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG INFORMATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 3142655282     PISSN: 14388871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Fox S, Fallows D. Health searches and email have become more commonplace, but there is room for improvement in searches and overall Internet access. 2003 Jul 16. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/ PIP_Health_Report_July_2003.pdf [accessed 2003 Sep 10]
2. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web. A systematic review. JAMA 2002 May 22-29;287(20):2691-2700. [Medline]
3. Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the Internet. JAMA 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2869-2871. [Medline]
4. Risk A, Petersen C. Health information on the Internet: quality issues and international initiatives [editorial]. JAMA 2002 May 22-29;287(20):2713- 2715.
5. Bessell TL, Whitty JA, McGuire TM, Anderson JN, Hiller JE, Sansom LN. Medicines and the Internet: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of online medicine information seekers. Aust Pharm 2002;21:361-365.
6. Eysenbach G, Kohler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-577. [Full text] [Full text] [Medline]
7. Koo M, Krass I, Aslani P. Factors influencing consumer use of written drug information. Pharmacother 2003;37:259-267.
8. Kitzinger J. Focus groups with users and providers of health care. In: Pope C, Mays N, editors. Qualitative research in health care. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 1999. [Full text]
9. Morgan D. The focus group guidebook. Focus group kit. Vol 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
10. Quine S. Focus groups. In: Kerr C, Taylor R, Heard G, editors. Handbook of public health methods. Sydney: McGraw Hill; 1998. p. 527-532
11. Morgan D. Planning focus groups. Focus group kit. Vol 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
12. Grbich C. Qualitative research in health: an introduction. Sydney: Allen & Unwin; 1999.
13. Morgan D, Krueger RA. Developing questions for focus groups. Focus group kit Vol 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
14. Converse JM, Presser S. Survey questions: handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1986.
15. Carson D, Gilmore A, Perry C, Kjell G. Focus group interviewing. In: Carson D, Gilmore A, Perry C, Kjell G. Qualitative marketing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
16. QSR NVivo [computer program]. Version 2.0.161. Melbourne, Australia: QSR International Pty Ltd; 2002.
17. Bowling A. Qualitative and combined research methods, and their analysis. In: Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997.
18. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian standard classification of occupations 1221.0. URL: http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/ c1061106e0c3442fca2568b5007b861d/393f0d1c005a17b0ca2568a900143c91!OpenDocument [accessed 2003 May 30]
19. AltaVista. AltaVista home page. URL: http://www.altavista.com/ [accessed 2003 Sep 15]
20. Ask Jeeves Inc. Ask Jeeves home page. URL: http://www.ask.com/[accessed 2003 Sep 15]
21. Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! home page. URL: http://www.yahoo.com/ [accessed 2003 Sep 15]
22. Google. Google home page. URL: http://www.google.com/ [accessed 2003 Sep 15]
23. Infospace. Dogpile home page. URL: http://www.dogpile.com/ [accessed 2003 Sep 15]
24. e-Jaz. Search66 home page. URL: http://search66.com/ [accessed 2003 Sep 15]
25. WebWombat Pty Ltd. Web Wombat home page. URL: http://www.webwombat.com. au/ [accessed 2003 Sep 15]
26. ninemsn Pty Ltd. ninemsn home page. URL: http:/ninemsn.com.au/ [accessed 2003 Sep 15]
27. Microsoft Corp. MSN Search. URL: http:/search.msn.com/ [accessed 2003 Sep 15]
28. Gibbs S, Waters WE, George CF. The benefits of prescription information leaflets (1). Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989 Jun;27(6):723-739. [Medline]
29. Gibbs S, Waters WE, George CF. The benefits of prescription information leaflets (2). Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989 Sep;28(3):345-351. [Medline]
30. Van Haecht CHM, Vander Stichele R, De Backer G, Bogaert MG. Impact of patient package inserts on patients' satisfaction, adverse drug reactions and risk perception: the case of NSAIDs for posttraumatic pain relief. Patient Educ Couns 1991;17:205-215.
31. Lloyd AK. A CPI dilemma: refused prescriptions. Aust Pharm 1994;13:656.
32. Vander Stichele RH, Van Haecht CHM, Braem MD, Bogaert MG. Attitude of the public toward technical package inserts for medication information in Belgium. DICP 1991 Sep;25(9):1002-1006. [Medline]
33. Johnson MW, Mitch WE, Sherwood J, Lopes L, Schmidt A, Hartley H. The impact of a drug information sheet on the understanding and attitude of patients about drugs. JAMA 1986 Nov 21;256(19):2722-2724. [Medline]
34. Bandesha G, Raynor DK, Teale C. Preliminary investigation of patient information leaflets as package inserts. Int J Pharm Pract 1996;4:246-248.
35. Peura S, Klaukka T, Hannula AM, Eerikainen S. Electronically produced information leaflets increase patients' understanding of antibiotics. Int J Pharm Pract 1993;2:22-25.
36. Winfield AJ, Owen CW. Information leaflets: a means of improving patient compliance. Br J Pharm Pract 1990;12:206-209.
37. Arthur VAM. Written patient information: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 1995 Jun;21(6):1081-1086. [Medline]
38. Mottram D, Reed C. Comparative evaluation of patient information leaflets by pharmacists, doctors and the general public. J Clin Pharm Ther 1997 Apr;22(2):127-134. [Medline]
39. Bernardini C, Ambrogi V, Perioli LC, Tiralti MC, Fardella G. Comprehensibility of the package leaflets of all medicinal products for human use: a questionnaire survey about the use of symbols and pictograms. Pharmacol Res 2000 Jun;41(6):679-688. [Medline]
40. Cline RJW, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 2001 Dec;16(6):671-692. [Medline]
41. Graber MA, Weckmann M. Pharmaceutical company internet sites as sources of information about antidepressant medications. CNS Drugs 2002;16(6):419-423. [Medline]
42. Ward MR, Lee MJ. Internet shopping, consumer search and product branding. The Journal of Product and Brand Management 2000;9:6-18. [Full text]
43. Helwig AL, Lovelle A, Guse CE, Gottlieb MS. An office-based Internet patient education system: a pilot study. J Fam Pract 1999 Feb;48(2):123-127. [Medline]
44. Leaffer T, Gonda B. The Internet: an underutilized tool in patient education. Comput Nurs 2000 Jan-Feb;18(1):47-52. [Medline]
45. Snyder M, Huber JT, Wegmann D. Education for consumer health: a train the trainer collaboration. Health Care on the Internet 2002;6:49-60.
46. Oermann MH, Hamilton J, Shook ML. Using the Web to improve seniors' awareness of their role in preventing medical errors. J Nurs Care Qual 2003 Apr-Jun;18(2):122-128. [Medline]
47. Krass I, Thomas R, Walker WL. Health advisory activities of community pharmacists. Paper 1A: a baseline study. Aust Pharm 1991;10:69-75.
48. ACNielsen.consult. The second annual Australian eHealth study: impact of the Internet on health consumers, medical practitioners and pharmacists. 2002 Nov. URL: http://www.consult.com.au/pdf/eHealth2002Summary.pdf [accessed 2003 Dec 11]
49. Williams KA, Wong I. Searching for health information on the Internet: a pilot evaluation of pharmacists' skills. Aust Pharm 2003;22:716-719.