메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 158, Issue 5 PART 2, 2013, Pages 365-368

The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now

(29)  Shekelle, Paul G a   Pronovost, Peter J b   Wachter, Robert M c   McDonald, Kathryn M d   Schoelles, Karen e   Dy, Sydney M f   Shojania, Kaveh g   Reston, James T e   Adams, Alyce S h   Angood, Peter B i   Bates, David W i   Bickman, Leonard j   Carayon, Pascale k   Donaldson, Liam l   Duan, Naihua m   Farley, Donna O n   Greenhalgh, Trisha o   Haughom, John L p   Lake, Eileen q   Lilford, Richard r   more..


Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TEAMWORK; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84874669545     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00001     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (239)

References (11)
  • 3
    • 44149084973 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews
    • [PMID: 18490690]
    • Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Chou R, Shekelle P, Robinson KA. Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148: 776-82. [PMID: 18490690]
    • (2008) Ann Intern Med , vol.148 , pp. 776-782
    • Whitlock, E.P.1    Lin, J.S.2    Chou, R.3    Shekelle, P.4    Robinson, K.A.5
  • 4
    • 34548442822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis
    • [PMID: 17638714]
    • Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Doucette S, Moher D. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:224-33. [PMID: 17638714]
    • (2007) Ann Intern Med , vol.147 , pp. 224-233
    • Shojania, K.G.1    Sampson, M.2    Ansari, M.T.3    Ji, J.4    Doucette, S.5    Moher, D.6
  • 5
    • 77949778981 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, AHRQ publication no. 10(11)-EHC063-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. Accessed at on 20 July 2012
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ publication no. 10(11)-EHC063-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. Accessed at http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/318/MethodsGuide_Prepublication-Draft_20120523.pdf on 20 July 2012
    • Methods Guide For Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews
  • 7
    • 0035318124 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process
    • M Third US Preventive Services Task Force ethods Work Group, [PMID: 11306229]
    • Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Lohr KN, Mulrow CD, Teutsch SM, et al; Methods Work Group, Third US Preventive Services Task Force. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:21-35. [PMID: 11306229]
    • (2001) Am J Prev Med , vol.20 , pp. 21-35
    • Harris, R.P.1    Helfand, M.2    Woolf, S.H.3    Lohr, K.N.4    Mulrow, C.D.5    Teutsch, S.M.6
  • 8
    • 84859001212 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
    • Cochrane Bias Methods Group, [PMID: 22008217]
    • Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al; Cochrane Bias Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928[PMID: 22008217]
    • (2011) BMJ , vol.343
    • Higgins, J.P.1    Altman, D.G.2    Gøtzsche, P.C.3    Jüni, P.4    Moher, D.5    Oxman, A.D.6
  • 10
    • 77949609822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AHRQ series paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions-agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program
    • [PMID: 19595577]
    • Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, Treadwell JR, Reston JT, Bass EB, et al. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions-agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:513-23. [PMID: 19595577]
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 513-523
    • Owens, D.K.1    Lohr, K.N.2    Atkins, D.3    Treadwell, J.R.4    Reston, J.T.5    Bass, E.B.6
  • 11
    • 84874695973 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. Accessed at, on 20 July 2012
    • Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. Accessed at www.gradeworkinggroup.org on 20 July 2012


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.