Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 142, Issue , 2017, Pages 2374-2383

  Martinez Conesa, Isabel ^a   Soto Acosta, Pedro ^a   Palacios Manzano, Mercedes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Firm performance; Organizational innovation; SMEs

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES (CSR); EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FIRM PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATIVE MODELING; NOCV1; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; SMES; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING;

INNOVATION;

EID: 85006832830     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.038     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Aguinis, H., Glavas, A., What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J. Manag. 38:4 (2012), 932–968.
2. Amato, L.H., Amato, C.H., The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. J. Bus. Ethics 72:3 (2007), 229–241.
3. Aragon-Correa, J.A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., Garcia-Morales, V.J., Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 86:1 (2008), 88–103.
4. Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., Hatfield, J., An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 28:2 (1985), 446–463.
5. Aupperle, K.E., The use of forced-choice survey procedures in assessing corporate social orientation. Res Corp. Soc. Perform Policy 12 (1991), 269–279.
6. Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., Phillips, L.W., Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm. Sci. Q. 36:3 (1991), 421–458.
7. Bansal, P., Envolving sustainable: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg. Manag. J. 26 (2005), 197–218.
8. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R., The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol. Stud. 2:2 (1995), 285–309.
9. Barnett, M.L., Salomon, R.M., Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strateg. Manag. J., 27(11), 2006, 1101.
10. Barroso, C., Cepeda-Carrion, G., Roldan, J.L., Applying maximum likelihood and PLS on different sample sizes: studies on SERVQUAL model and employee behavior model. Esposito-Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H., (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, 2010, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 427–447.
11. Battaglia, M., Testa, F., Bianchi, L., Iraldo, F., Frey, M., Corporate social responsibility and competitiveness within SMEs of the fashion industry: evidence from Italy and France. Sustainability 6:2 (2014), 872–893.
12. Baumgartner, R.J., Ebner, D., Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sust. Dev. 18 (2010), 76–89.
13. Baumgartner, R.J., Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: a conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 21:5 (2014), 258–271.
14. Baumgartner, R.J., Rauter, R., Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. J. Clean. Prod. 140 (2016), 81–92.
15. Biondi, V., Iraldo, F., Meredith, S., Achieving sustainability through environmental innovation: the role of SMEs. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 24:5–6 (2002), 612–626.
16. Bocquet, R., Product and process innovations in subcontracting: empirical evidence from the Sillon Alpin. Ind. Innov 18:7 (2011), 649–668.
17. Bocquet, R., Bas, C.L., Mothe, C., Poussing, N., Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? empirical analysis with survey data. Eur. Manag. J. 31 (2013), 642–654.
18. Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., Wagner, M., Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. J. Clean. Prod. 45 (2013), 1–8.
19. Bowman, E., Haire, M., A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. Calif. Manag. Rev. 18:2 (1975), 49–58.
20. Chang, Y.-Y., Hughes, M., Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to medium-sized firms. Eur. Manag. J. 30:1 (2012), 1–17.
21. Chin, W., The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Marcoulides, G.A., (eds.) Modern Methods for Business Research, 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, Mahwah, NJ, 295–336.
22. Clarkson, M., A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20:1 (1995), 92–118.
23. Craig, J.B., Moores, K., A 10-year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 19:1 (2006), 1–10.
24. Donate, M., Guadamillas, F., Organizational factors to support knowledge management and innovation. J. Knowl. Manag. 15:6 (2011), 890–914.
25. Eesley, C., Lenox, M.J., Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strat. Manag. J. 27:8 (2006), 765–781.
26. Engert, S., Rauter, R., Baumgartner, R.J., Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: a literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016), 2833–2850.
27. European Parliament, A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility. 2011 Brussels, 25.10.2011. COM (2011) 681 final.
28. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.L., de Colle, S., Stakeholder Theory. The State of the Art. 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18:1 (1981), 39–50.
30. Gallardo-Vázquez, D., Sánchez-Hernández, M.I., Análisis de la Incidencia de la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial en el Éxito Competitivo de las Microempresas y el Papel de la Innovación, vol. 38, 2013, Univ. Bus. Rev., 14–31.
31. Gallardo-Vázquez, D., Sánchez-Hernández, M.I., Measuring corporate social responsibility for competitive success at a regional level. J. Clean. Prod. 72:1 (2014), 14–22.
32. Gallego-Alvarez, I., Prado-Lorenzo, J.M., Garcıa-Sanchez, I.-M., Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a resource-based theory. Manag. Decis. 49:10 (2011), 1709–1727.
33. González-Ramos, M., Donate, M., Guadamillas, F., Technological posture and corporate social responsibility: effects on innovation performance. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 13:10 (2014), 2497–2505.
34. Gyves, S., O'Higgins, E., Corporate social responsibility: an avenue for sustainable benefit for society and the firm?. Soc. Bus. Rev. 3:3 (2008), 207–223.
35. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis. fifth ed., 1998, Prentice-Hall, London.
36. Hammann, J., Weber, R., Lowenstein, R., Self interest through delegation: an additional rationale for the principal agent relationship. Am. Econ. Rev. 5 (2009), 55–70.
37. Hansen, E.G., Grosse-Dunker, F., Reichwald, R., Sustainability innovation cube- a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 13 (2009), 683–713.
38. Hart, S.L., Sharma, S., Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Acad. Manag. Exec. 18:1 (2004), 7–18.
39. He, Z.L., Wong, P.K., Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organiz. Sci. 15:4 (2004), 481–494.
40. Heikkurinen, P., Bonnedahl, K.J., Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: a review and conceptual comparison of market and stakeholder-oriented strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 43 (2013), 191–198.
41. Hillman, A.J., Keim, G.D., Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?. Strateg. Manag. J. 22:2 (2001), 125–139.
42. Hull, C.E., Rothenberg, S., Firm performance: the inter-actions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strateg. Manag. J. 29:7 (2008), 781–789.
43. Jawahar, I., McLaughlin, G., Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life approach. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:3 (2001), 397–414.
44. Jenkins, H., Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Jo. Bus. Ethics 67 (2006), 241–256.
45. Judge, W.Q., Douglas, T.J., Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment. J. Manag. Stud., 35(2), 1998, 241.
46. Klewitz, J., Hansen, E.G., Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 65 (2014), 57–75.
47. Lee, H., Choi, B., Knowledge enablers, processes and organizational performance: an integrated view and empirical examination. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20:1 (2003), 179–228.
48. Lepoutre, J., Heene, A., Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: a critical review. J. Bus. Ethics 67:3 (2006), 257–273.
49. Lindell, M.K., Whitney, D.J., Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86:1 (2001), 114–121.
50. Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., Johnston, W.J., Corporate social responsibility: an empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. J. Bus. Ethics 85:Suppl. 2 (2009), 303–323.
51. Lloret, A., Modeling corporate sustainability strategy. J. Bus. Res. 69 (2016), 418–425.
52. Lo, S., Performance evaluation for sustainable business: a profitability and marketability framework. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 17 (2010), 311–319.
53. Lozano, R., Carpenter, A., Huisingh, D., A review of ‘theories of the firm’ and their contributions to Corporate Sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 106 (2015), 430–442.
54. Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., Veiga, J.F., Ambidexterity and performance in small- to mediumsized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J. Manag. 32:5 (2006), 646–672.
55. Luo, X., Homburg, C., Neglected outcomes of customer satisfaction. J. Mark. 71:2 (2007), 133–149.
56. MacGregor, S.P., Fontrodona, J., Exploring the Fit between CSR and Innovation. Working paper, 2008, University of Navarra, IESE Business School.
57. MacGregor, S.P., Spinach, X., Fontrodona, J., Social Innovation: Using Design to Generate Business Value through Corporate Social Responsibility. 2007, IESE Business School, University of Gerona, Spain.
58. MacKinnon, D.P., Ghulam, W., Dwyer, J., A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivar. Behav. Res. 30:1 (1995), 41–62.
59. Mahmoud, M.A., Hinson, R.E., Market orientation, innovation and corporate social responsibility practices in Ghana's telecommunication sector. Soc. Responsib. J. 8:3 (2012), 327–346.
60. Manu, F.A., Innovation orientation, environment and performance: a comparison of U.S. and European markets. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 23:2 (1992), 333–359.
61. Margolis, J.D., Elfenbein, H.A., Walsh, J.P., Does it Pay to Be Good? a Meta-analysis and Redirection of Research on Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Working Paper, 2007, Harvard Business School, Boston.
62. Marín, L., Rubio, A., ¿Moda o Factor Competitivo? Un Estudio Empírico de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa en PYMEs. Inf. Com. Esp. Rev. Econ. 842 (2008), 177–193.
63. Marín, L., Rubio, A., Ruiz de Maya, S., Competitiveness as strategic outcome of corporate social responsibility. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 19:6 (2012), 364–376.
64. Maron, I.Y., Toward a unified theory of the CSP-CFP link. J. Bus. Ethics 67:2 (2006), 191–200.
65. Matos, S., Silvestre, B.S., Managing stakeholder relations when developing sustainable business models: the case of the Brazilian energy sector. J. Clean. Prod. 45 (2013), 61–73.
66. McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., Schneeweis, T., Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad. Manag. J. 31:4 (1988), 854–872.
67. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification. Strateg. Manag. J. 21 (2000), 603–609.
68. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Wright, P., Guest editors' introduction: corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J. Manag. Stud. 43:1 (2006), 1–18.
69. Mendibil, K., Hernandez, J., Espinach, X., Garriga, E., Macgregor, S., How Can CSR Practices Lead to Successful Innovation in SMEs?. 2007, Publication from the RESPONSE Project Strathclyde, 141.
70. Mill, G., The financial performance of a socially responsible investment over time and a possible link with corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 63:2 (2006), 131–148.
71. Montiel, I., Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Organiz. Environ. 21:3 (2008), 245–269.
72. Moore, S.B., Manring, S.L., Strategy development in small and medium sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009), 276–282.
73. Morsing, M., Perrini, F., CSR in SMEs: do SMEs matter for the CSR agenda?. Bus. Ethics A Eur. Rev. 18 (2009), 1–6.
74. Neville, B., Bell, S., Menguc, B., Corporate responsibility, stakeholders and the social performance – financial performance relationship. Eur. J. Mark. 39:9/10 (2005), 1184–1198.
75. Niehm, L.S., Swinney, J., Miller, N.J., Community social responsibility and its consequences for family business performance. J. Small Bus. Manag. 46:3 (2008), 331–350.
76. Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric Theory. 1967, McGraw-Hill, New York.
77. OECD, The New Nature of Innovation. 2009 http://www.newnatureofinnovation.org.
78. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., Rynes, S., Corporate social and financial performance: a meta analysis. Organ. Stud. 24:3 (2003), 403–441.
79. Padgett, R.C., Galan, J., The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility”. J. Bus. Ethics 93 (2010), 407–418.
80. Park, S., Lee, S., Financial rewards for social responsibility cornell. Hosp. Quart. 50:2 (2009), 168–179.
81. Paramanathan, S., Farruckh, C., Phaal, R., Probert, D., Implementing industrial sustainability: the research issues in technology management. R&D Manag. 34 (2004), 527–537.
82. Petter, S., Straub, D., Rai, A., Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31:4 (2007), 623–656.
83. Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., Vurro, C., Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. J. Bus. Ethics 102:1 Suppl. ment (2011), 59–76.
84. Perrine, F., A conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility and innovation. Glob. J. Bus. Res. 6:5 (2012), 85–96.
85. Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W., Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12:4 (1986), 531–544.
86. Polder, M., Van Leeuwen, G., Mohnen, P., Raymond, W., Product, Process and Organizational Innovation: Drivers, Complementarity and Productivity Effects. 2010, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 035, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology.
87. Prado-Lorenzo, J., Gallego-Alvarez, I., Garcia-Sanchez, I., Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Social responsibility in Spain: practices and motivations in firms. Manag. Decis. 46:8 (2008), 1247–1271.
88. Preston, L., O'Bannon, D., The corporate social – financial performance relationship. Bus. Soc. 36:4 (1997), 419–430.
89. Quinn, R.E., Rohrbaugh, J., A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manag. Sci. 29:3 (1983), 363–377.
90. Qu, R., The impact of market orientation and corporate social responsibility on firm performance evidence from China. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 21 (2009), 570–582.
91. Rodgers, W., Choy, H.L., Guiral, A., Do investors value a firm's commitment to social activities?. J. Bus. Ethics 114:4 (2013), 607–623.
92. Roome, N., Business strategy, R&D management and environmental imperatives. R&D Manag. 24 (1994), 65–82.
93. Russo, A., Perrini, F., Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. J. Bus. Ethics 91 (2010), 207–221.
94. Saez-Martinez, F.J., Gonzalez-Moreno, A., Hogan, T., The role of Univesity in Eco-entrepreneurship: evidence from the Eurobarometer survey on attitudes of European entrepreneurs towards eco-innovation. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 13:10 (2014), 2541–2549.
95. Saltzman, O., Ionescue-Somers, A., Steger, U., The business case for corporate sustainability: literature review and research option. Eur. Manag. J. 23 (2005), 2–36.
96. Schaltegger, S., Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success. Soc. Econ. 33 (2011), 15–28.
97. Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H., Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 19 (1998), 729–753.
98. Soto-Acosta, P., Meroño-Cerdan, A., Analyzing e-Business value creation from a resource-based perspective. Intern. J. Inf. Manag. 28:1 (2008), 49–60.
99. Sotorrio, L.L., Sánchez, J.F., Corporate social responsibility of the most highly reputed European and North American firms. J. Bus. Ethics 82:2 (2008), 379–390.
100. Spanish Ministry of Employment and Social Security, Spanish strategy on companies’ corporate social responsibility practices 2014–2020. 2014 Downloadable at http://www.empleo.gob.es/es/sec_trabajo/EERSE_WEB.pdf.
101. Surroca, J., Tribò Jorep, A., Waddock, S., Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strateg. Manag. J. 31:5 (2010), 463–490.
102. Sweeney, L., A Study of Current Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and an Examination of the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). PhD thesis, 2009, Dublin Institute of Technology.
103. Tenenhaus, M., Esposito, V., Chatelin, Y., Lauro, C., PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 48 (2008), 159–205.
104. The European Commission, Europe 2020. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010, 2010 2020:FIN: EN:PDF. September 5, 2014.
105. Tomsic, N., Bojnec, S., Simcic, B., Corporate sustainability and economic performance in small and medium sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 108 (2015), 603–612.
106. Torugsa, N.A., O'Donohue, W., Hecker, R., Capabilities, proactive CSR and financial performance in SMEs: empirical evidence from an Australian manufacturing industry sector. J. Bus. Ethics 109:4 (2012), 483–500.
107. Torugsa, N., O'Donohue, W., Hecker, R., Proactive CSR: an empirical analysis of the role of its economic, social and environmental dimensions on the association between capabilities and performance. J. Bus. Ethics 115 (2013), 383–402.
108. Turyakira, P., Venter, E., Smith, E., The impact of corporate social responsibility factors on the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises. S. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 17:1 (2014), 157–172.
109. Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B., The corporate social performance- financial performance link. Strateg. Manag. J. 18:4 (1997), 303–319.
110. Wagner, M., Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: a quantitative analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 94:4 (2010), 581–594.
111. White, P., Building a sustainability strategy into the business. Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 9:4 (2009), 386–394.
112. Wolfe, L., The introduction of path analysis to the social sciences, and some emergent themes: an annotated bibliography. Struct. Equ. Model 10:1 (2003), 1–34.
113. Wu, M.L., Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Acad. Bus. 8:1 (2006), 163–171.