Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I: Electrophysiology

Hearing Research

Volumn 344, Issue , 2017, Pages 68-81

  Prendergast, Garreth ^a   Guest, Hannah ^a   Munro, Kevin J ^a,b   Kluk, Karolina ^a   Léger, Agnès ^a   Hall, Deborah A ^c,d   Heinz, Michael G ^e   Plack, Christopher J ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with UK Health Security Agency   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^e PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem response; Cochlear synaptopathy; Frequency following response; Hidden hearing loss; Noise induced hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDIOMETRIC THRESHOLD; AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; COCHLEAR SYNAPTOPATHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY FOLLOWING RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INNER EAR DISEASE; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NOISE EXPOSURE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REFERENCE VALUE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TRANSIENT EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; TRANSPOSED TONE; TREND STUDY; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; AGE; AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; NOISE; NOISE INJURY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REACTION TIME; RISK FACTOR; SEX FACTOR; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; SYNAPSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REACTION TIME; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SYNAPSES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85006757061     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abdala, C., Folsom, R.C., Frequency contribution to the click-evoked auditory brain-stem response in human adults and infants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 (1995), 2394–2404.
2. Barker, D., Hopkins, K., Baker, R., Plack, C.J., Detecting the early effects of noise exposure. Paper Presented at the Midwinter Meeting of Association for Research in Otolaryngology, San Diego, 2014.
3. Beattie, R.C., Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response. Scand. Audiol. 17 (1988), 99–109.
4. Bernstein, L.R., Trahiotis, C., Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli”. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (2002), 1026–1036.
5. Bharadwaj, H.M., Masud, S., Mehraei, G., Verhulst, S., Shinn-Cunningham, B.G., Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits. J. Neurosci. 35 (2015), 2161–2172.
6. Bourien, J., Tang, Y., Batrel, C., Huet, A., Lenoir, M., Ladrech, S., Desmadryl, G., Nouvian, R., Puel, J.L., Wang, J., Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve. J. Neurophysiol. 112 (2014), 1025–1039.
7. British Society of Audiology, Pure-tone air-conduction and bone-conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking. Recomm. Proced. Br. Soc. Audiol. Read. UK, 32, 2011.
8. Cody, A.R., Robertson, D., Variability of noise-induced damage in the guinea pig cochlea: electrophysiological and morphological correlates after strictly controlled exposures. Hear. Res. 9 (1983), 55–70.
9. Fernandez, K.A., Jeffers, P.W.C., Lall, K., Liberman, M.C., Kujawa, S.G., Aging after noise exposure: acceleration of cochlear synaptopathy in “recovered” ears. J. Neurosci 35 (2015), 7509–7520.
10. Furman, A.C., Kujawa, S.G., Liberman, M.C., Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. J. Neurophysiol. 110 (2013), 577–586.
11. Gu, J.W., Herrmann, B.S., Levine, R.A., Melcher, J.R., Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 13 (2012), 819–833.
12. Hecox, K., Galambos, R., Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Arch. Otolaryngol. 99 (1974), 30–33.
13. Hickox, A.E., Carbajal, S., Walls, M.K., Maulden, A.C., Verble, K.M., Heinz, M.G., Comparing behavioral and psychophysical measures in chinchillas before and after moderate noise exposure. Poster Presented at the Midwinter Meeting of Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Baltimore, 2015.
14. Howgate, S., Plack, C.J., A behavioral measure of the cochlear changes underlying temporary threshold shifts. Hear. Res. 277 (2011), 78–87.
15. Issa, A., Ross, H.F., An improved procedure for assessing ABR latency in young subjects based on a new normative data set. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 32 (1995), 35–47.
16. Jerger, J., Hall, J., Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response. Arch. Otolaryngol. 106 (1980), 387–391.
17. Konrad-Martin, D., Dille, M.F., McMillan, G., Griest, S., McDermott, D., Fausti, S.A., Austin, D.F., Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 23 (2012), 18–35.
18. Krishnan, A., Frequency-following response. Burkhard, R.F., Don, M., Eggermont, J., (eds.) Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application, 2006, Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 313–333.
19. Kujawa, S.G., Liberman, M.C., Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurosci. 29 (2009), 14077–14085.
20. Lauter, J.L., Loomis, R.L., Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. II. Amplitude of brainstem Vertex-positive peaks. Scand. Audiol. 17 (1988), 87–92.
21. Liberman, M.C., Dodds, L.W., Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear. Res. 16 (1984), 55–74.
22. Liberman, M.C., Epstein, M.J., Cleveland, S.S., Wang, H., Maison, S.F., Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS One, 19, 2016, e0162726.
23. Lin, H., Furman, A., Kujawa, S., Liberman, M.C., Primary neural degeneration in the guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 12 (2011), 605–616.
24. Liu, L., Wang, H., Shi, L., Almuklass, A., He, T., Aiken, S., Wang, J., Silent damage of noise on cochlear afferent innervation in guinea pigs and the impact on temporal processing. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e49550.
25. Lutman, M.E., Davis, A.C., Ferguson, M.A., Epidemiological evidence for the effectiveness of the noise at work regulations. Health Saf. Exec., 2008 Research Report RR669.
26. Maison, S.F., Usubuchi, H., Liberman, M.C., Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure. J. Neurosci. 33 (2013), 5542–5552.
27. Makary, C.A., Shin, J., Kujawa, S.G., Liberman, M.C., Merchant, S.N., Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 12 (2011), 711–717.
28. Maris, E., Oostenveld, R., Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J. Neurosci. Methods 164 (2007), 177–190.
29. McBride, D.I., Williams, S., Characteristics of the audiometric notch as a clinical sign of noise exposure. Scand. Audiol. 30 (2001), 106–111.
30. McFadden, D., The curious half octave shift: evidence for a basalward migration of the travelling-wave envelope with increasing intensity. Salvi, R.J., Henderson, D., Hamernik, R.P., Colletti, V., (eds.) Basic and Applied Aspects of Noise-induced Hearing Loss, 1986, Plenum, New York.
31. Mehraei, G., Hickox, A.E., Bharadwaj, H.M., Goldberg, H., Verhulst, S., Liberman, M.C., Shinn- Cunningham, B.G., Auditory brainstem response latency in noise as a marker of cochlear synaptopathy. J. Neurosci. 36 (2016), 3755–3764.
32. Picton, T.W., Stapells, D.R., Campbell, K.B., Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem. J. Otolaryngol. Suppl. 9 (1981), 1–14.
33. Plack, C.J., Barker, D., Prendergast, G., Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends Hear 18 (2014), 1–11.
34. Plack, C.J., Leger, A., Prendergast, G., Guest, H., Kluk-de Kort, K., Munro, K., Towards a diagnostic test for hidden hearing loss. Trends Hear., 20, 2016 2331216516657466.
35. Portnuff, C.D., Fligor, B.J., Arehart, K.H., Self-report and long-term field measures of MP3 player use: how accurate is self-report?. Int. J. Audiol 52 (2013), S33–S40.
36. Prendergast, G., Johnson, S.R., Hymers, M., Woods, W., Green, G.G., Non-parametric statistical thresholding of baseline free MEG beamformer images. Neuroimage 54 (2011), 906–918.
37. Rhode, W.S., Smith, P.H., Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers. Hear. Res. 18 (1985), 159–168.
38. Rodriguez Valiente, A., Trinidad, A., Garcia Berrocal, J.R., Gorriz, C., Ramirez Camacho, R., Extended high-frequency (9–20 kHz) audiometry reference thresholds in 645 healthy subjects. Int. J. Audiol. 53 (2014), 531–545.
39. Schmiedt, R.A., Mills, J.H., Boettcher, F.A., Age-related loss of activity of auditory-nerve fibers. J. Neurophysiol. 76 (1996), 2799–2803.
40. Schaette, R., McAlpine, D., Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J. Neurosci. 31 (2011), 13452–13457.
41. Shaheen, L.A., Valero, M.D., Liberman, M.C., Towards a diagnosis of cochlear synaptopathy with envelope following responses. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 16 (2015), 727–745.
42. Shi, L., Liu, L., He, T., Guo, X., Yu, Z., Yin, S., Wang, J., Ribbon synapse plasticity in the cochleae of guinea pigs after noise-induced silent damage. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e81566.
43. Smeatham, D., Noise levels and noise exposure of workers in pubs and clubs – a review of the literature. Health Saf. Exec., 2002 Research Report 026.
44. Song, Q., Shen, P., Li, X., Shi, L., Liu, L., Wang, J., Yu, Z., Stephen, K., Aiken, S., Yin, S., Wang, J., Coding deficits in hidden hearing loss induced by noise: the nature and impacts. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 25200.
45. Stamper, G.C., Johnson, T.A., Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears. Ear Hear. 36 (2015), 172–184.
46. Stamper, G.C., Johnson, T.A., Letter to the Editor: examination of potential sex influences in Stamper, G. C., & Johnson, T. A. (2015). Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears. Ear Hear 36 (2015), 172–184 Ear. Hear. 36, 738–740.
47. Stone, M.A., Moore, B.C., Greenish, H., Discrimination of envelope statistics reveals evidence of sub-clinical hearing damage in a noise-exposed population with ‘normal’ hearing thresholds. Int. J. Audiol. 47 (2008), 737–750.
48. Toynbee, J., Diseases of the Ear: Their Nature, Diagnosis, and Treatment. 1860, Churchill, London.
49. Xu, Z.M., Vinck, B., De Vel, E., van Cauwenberge, P., Mechanisms in noise-induced permanent hearing loss: an evoked otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem response study. J. Laryngol. Otol. 112 (1998), 1154–1161.