Towards a Diagnosis of Cochlear Neuropathy with Envelope Following Responses

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 727-745

  Shaheen, Luke A ^a,b   Valero, Michelle D ^b,c   Liberman, M Charles ^a,b,c  

^a HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

acoustic overexposure; auditory brainstem response; auditory nerve; auditory neuropathy; auditory steady state response; envelope following response; hidden hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; COCHLEA FENESTRA; COCHLEAR NEUROPATHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENVELOPE FOLLOWING RESPONSE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; MALE; MOUSE; NEUROPATHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND PRESSURE; SPIRAL GANGLION; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE DISEASE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; AUDITORY SYSTEM EXAMINATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CBA MOUSE; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVALUATION STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; NOISE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE DISEASES;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR NERVE; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OTOLOGICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; MALE; MICE, INBRED CBA; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NOISE; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE DISEASES;

EID: 84947024867     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: 14387573     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0539-3     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderson S, White-Schwoch T, Choi HJ, Kraus N (2013) Training changes processing of speech cues in older adults with hearing loss. Front Syst Neurosci 7:97
2. Azarias G, Kruusmägi M, Connor S, Akkuratov EE, Liu X-L, Lyons D, Brismar H, Broberger C, Aperia A (2013) A specific and essential role for Na, K-ATPase α3 in neurons co-expressing α1 and α3. J Biol Chem 288:2734–2743
3. Bharadwaj HM, Verhulst S, Shaheen L, Liberman MC, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2014) Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound. Front Syst Neurosci 8:26
4. Bharadwaj HM, Masud S, Mehraei G, Verhulst S, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2015) Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits. J Neurosci 35:2161–2172
5. Bourien J, Tang Y, Batrel C, Huet A, Lenoir M, Ladrech S, Desmadryl G, Nouvian R, Puel J-L, Wang J (2014) Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve. J Neurophysiol 112:1025–1039
6. Campbell F, Atkinson J, Francis M, Green D (1977) Estimation of auditory thresholds using evoked potentials. Clin Screen Test Progr Clin Neurophysiol 2:68–78
7. Cooper NP, Robertson D, Yates GK (1993) Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics. J Neurophysiol 70:370–386
8. D’haenens W, Dhooge I, Maes L, Bockstael A, Keppler H, Philips B, Swinnen F, Vinck BM (2009) The clinical value of the multiple-frequency 80-Hz auditory steady-state response in adults with normal hearing and hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 135:496–506
9. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, Picton TW (2004) Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear 25:68–84
10. Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1989) Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. Ear Hear 10:2–13
11. Durrant JD, Wang J, Ding DL, Salvi RJ (1998) Are inner or outer hair cells the source of summating potentials recorded from the round window? J Acoust Soc Am 104:370–377
12. Frisina RD, Smith RL, Chamberlain SC (1990) Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement. Hear Res 44:99–122
13. Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2013) Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. J Neurophysiol 110:577–586
14. Gorga MP, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KA, Jesteadt W (1988) Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res 31:87–97
15. Greenwood DD, Joris PX (1996) Mechanical and “temporal” filtering as codeterminants of the response by cat primary fibers to amplitude‐modulated signals. J Acoust Soc Am 99:1029–1039
16. Gu JW, Herrmann BS, Levine RA, Melcher JR (2012) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 13:819–833
17. Hafidi A, Beurg M, Dulon D (2005) Localization and developmental expression of BK channels in mammalian cochlear hair cells. Neuroscience 130:475–484
18. Hall JW (2006) New handbook for auditory evoked responses, 1st edn. Pearson, Boston
19. Hentschke H, Stüttgen MC (2011) Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets. Eur J Neurosci 34:1887–1894
20. Herdman AT, Lins O, Roon PV, Stapells DR, Scherg M, Picton TW (2002) Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr 15:69–86
21. Johnson TA, Brown CJ (2005) Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison. Ear Hear 26:559–576
22. Joris PX, Yin TC (1992) Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 91:215–232
23. Joris PX, Schreiner CE, Rees A (2004) Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiol Rev 84:541–577
24. Khimich D, Nouvian R, Pujol R, Tom Dieck S, Egner A, Gundelfinger ED, Moser T (2005) Hair cell synaptic ribbons are essential for synchronous auditory signalling. Nature 434:889–894
25. Kidd RC, Weiss TF (1990) Mechanisms that degrade timing information in the cochlea. Hear Res 49:181–207
26. Kiren T, Aoyagi M, Furuse H, Koike Y (1994) An experimental study on the generator of amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Oto-Laryngol Suppl 511:28–33
27. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2006) Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth. J Neurosci 26:2115–2123
28. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2009) Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29:14077–14085
29. Kuwada S, Batra R, Maher VL (1986) Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 21:179–192
30. Kuwada S, Anderson JS, Batra R, Fitzpatrick DC, Teissier N, D’Angelo WR (2002) Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 13:188
31. Lang H, Li M, Kilpatrick LA, Zhu J, Samuvel DJ, Krug EL, Goddard JC (2011) Sox2 Up-regulation and glial cell proliferation following degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons in the adult mouse inner Ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:151–171
32. Liberman MC (1978) Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. J Acoust Soc Am 63:442–455
33. Liberman MC (1980) Morphological differences among radial afferent fibers in the cat cochlea: an electron-microscopic study of serial sections. Hear Res 3:45–63
34. Liberman MC, Dodds LW, Pierce S (1990) Afferent and efferent innervation of the cat cochlea: quantitative analysis with light and electron microscopy. J Comp Neurol 301:443–460
35. Lin H, Furman A, Kujawa S, Liberman M (2011) Primary neural degeneration in the guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:605–616
36. Lobarinas E, Salvi R, Ding D (2013) Insensitivity of the audiogram to carboplatin induced inner hair cell loss in chinchillas. Hear Res 302:113–120
37. Maison SF, Pyott SJ, Meredith AL, Liberman MC (2013a) Olivocochlear suppression of outer hair cells in vivo: evidence for combined action of BK and SK2 channels throughout the cochlea. J Neurophysiol 109:1525–1534
38. Maison SF, Usubuchi H, Liberman MC (2013b) Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure. J Neurosci 33:5542–5552
39. Makary C, Shin J, Kujawa S, Liberman M, Merchant S (2011) Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:711–717
40. Matsubara A, Laake JH, Davanger S, Usami S, Ottersen OP (1996) Organization of AMPA receptor subunits at a glutamate synapse: a quantitative immunogold analysis of hair cell synapses in the rat organ of Corti. J Neurosci 16:4457–4467
41. Melcher JR, Kiang NYS (1996) Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat III: identified cell populations. Hear Res 93:52–71
42. Meredith AL, Thorneloe KS, Werner ME, Nelson MT, Aldrich RW (2004) Overactive bladder and incontinence in the absence of the BK large conductance Ca2 + −activated K+ channel. J Biol Chem 279:36746–36752
43. Müller M, von Hünerbein K, Hoidis S, Smolders JWT (2005) A physiological place–frequency map of the cochlea in the CBA/J mouse. Hear Res 202:63–73
44. Nikiforidis GC, Koutsojannis CM, Varakis JN, Goumas PD (1993) Reduced variance in the latency and amplitude of the fifth wave of auditory brain stem response after normalization for head size. Ear Hear 14:423–428
45. Obrien WJ, Lingrel JB, Wallick ET (1994) Ouabain binding kinetics of the rat alpha two and alpha three isoforms of the sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphate. Arch Biochem Biophys 310:32–39
46. Oliver D, Taberner AM, Thurm H, Sausbier M, Arntz C, Ruth P, Fakler B, Liberman MC (2006) The role of BKCa channels in electrical signal encoding in the mammalian auditory periphery. J Neurosci 26:6181–6189
47. Parthasarathy A, Bartlett E (2012) Two-channel recording of auditory-evoked potentials to detect age-related deficits in temporal processing. Hear Res 289:52–62
48. Parthasarathy A, Datta J, Torres JAL, Hopkins C, Bartlett EL (2014) Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:649–661
49. Pauli-Magnus D, Hoch G, Strenzke N, Anderson S, Jentsch TJ, Moser T (2007) Detection and differentiation of sensorineural hearing loss in mice using auditory steady-state responses and transient auditory brainstem responses. Neuroscience 149:673–684
50. Pethe J, Von Specht H, Mühler R, Hocke T (2001) Amplitude modulation following responses in awake and sleeping humans—a comparison for 40 Hz and 80 Hz modulation frequency. Scand Audiol Suppl 152–155
51. Ping J, Li N, Du Y, Wu X, Li L, Galbraith G (2007) Auditory evoked responses in the rat: transverse mastoid needle electrodes register before cochlear nucleus and do not reflect later inferior colliculus activity. J Neurosci Methods 161:11–16
52. Plack CJ, Barker D, Prendergast G (2014) Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends Hear 18
53. Pyott SJ, Meredith AL, Fodor AA, Vázquez AE, Yamoah EN, Aldrich RW (2007) Cochlear function in mice lacking the BK channel α, β1, or β4 subunits. J Biol Chem 282:3312–3324
54. Rhode WS, Smith PH (1985) Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers. Hear Res 18:159–168
55. Rickards FW, Clark GM (1972) Field potentials in cat auditory nuclei in response to frequency and amplitude modulated sound. Proc Aust Physiol Pharmacol Soc p 201
56. Robertson D, Bester C, Vogler D, Mulders WHAM (2013) Spontaneous hyperactivity in the auditory midbrain: relationship to afferent input. Hear Res 295:124–129
57. Ruggles D, Bharadwaj H, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2011) Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:15516–15521
58. Sausbier U, Sausbier M, Sailer CA, Arntz C, Knaus H-G, Neuhuber W, Ruth P (2006) Ca2 + −activated K+ channels of the BK-type in the mouse brain. Histochem Cell Biol 125:725–741
59. Schaette R (2014) Tinnitus in men, mice (as well as other rodents), and machines. Hear Res 311:63–71
60. Schmiedt RA, Okamura H-O, Lang H, Schulte BA (2002) Ouabain application to the round window of the gerbil cochlea: a model of auditory neuropathy and apoptosis. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3:223–233
61. Schwaber MK, Hall JW (1990) A simplified technique for transtympanic electrocochleography. Am J Otol 11:260–265
62. Sergeyenko Y, Lall K, Liberman MC, Kujawa SG (2013) Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline. J Neurosci 33:13686–13694
63. Shera CA, Bergevin C (2012) Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data. J Acoust Soc Am 132:927–943
64. Skinner LJ, Enée V, Beurg M, Jung HH, Ryan AF, Hafidi A, Aran J-M, Dulon D (2003) Contribution of BK Ca2 + −activated K+ channels to auditory neurotransmission in the guinea Pig cochlea. J Neurophysiol 90:320–332
65. Stamataki S, Francis HW, Lehar M, May BJ, Ryugo DK (2006) Synaptic alterations at inner hair cells precede spiral ganglion cell loss in aging C57BL/6J mice. Hear Res 221:104–118
66. Stapells DR, Makeig S, Galambos R (1987) Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 67:260–270
67. Strait DL, Kraus N (2014) Biological impact of auditory expertise across the life span: musicians as a model of auditory learning. Hear Res 308:109–121
68. Taberner AM (2005) Using knockout mice to study the molecular mechanisms that shape auditory nerve responses. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
69. Taberner AM, Liberman MC (2005) Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse. J Neurophysiol 93:557–569
70. Tsuzuku T (1993) 40-Hz steady state response in awake cats after bilateral chronic lesions in auditory cortices or inferior Colliculi. Auris Nasus Larynx 20:263–274
71. Yuan Y, Shi F, Yin Y, Tong M, Lang H, Polley DB, Liberman MC, Edge ASB (2014) Ouabain-induced cochlear nerve degeneration: synaptic loss and plasticity in a mouse model of auditory neuropathy. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:31–43
72. Zhu L, Bharadwaj H, Xia J, Shinn-Cunningham B (2013) A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 134:384–395