Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 172-184

  Stamper, Greta C ^a   Johnson, Tiffany A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem response; Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Noise exposure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937971986     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: 15384667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000107     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Attias J., Horovitz G., El-Hatib N., Detection and clinical diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions. Noise Health (2001) 3 19 31
2. Bohne B. A., Harding G. W., Degeneration in the cochlea after noise damage: Primary versus secondary events. Am J Otol (2000) 21 505 509
3. Chasin M, Chasin M., Clinical assessment of musicians-Audiologist as a detective. Musicians and the Prevention of Hearing Loss (1996) San Diego, CA Singular Publishing Group, Inc 103 119
4. Cohen J., A power primer. Psychol Bull (1992) 112 155 159
5. Cook-Cunningham S. L., Grady M. L., Nelson H., Hearing dose and perceptions of hearing and singing effort among university choir singers in varied rehearsal and performance settings. Int J Res Choral Singing (2012) 4 19 35
6. Costalupes J. A., Young E. D., Gibson D. J., Effects of continuous noise backgrounds on rate response of auditory nerve fibers in cat. J Neurophysiol (1984) 51 1326 1344
7. Coughlin S. S., Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol (1990) 43 87 91
8. Don M., Eggermont J. J., Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am (1978) 63 1084 1092
9. Dunn D. E., Ferraro J. A., Lim D. J., Electro-physiological and morphological correlates of TTS in chinchilla. Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol (1979) 2 37
10. Earl B. R., Chertoff M. E., Predicting auditory nerve survival using the compound action potential. Ear Hear (2010) 31 7 21
11. Fernandez K., Lall K., Jeffers P. W. C., Acceleration of sensory and neural cochlear aging after TTS. 2014 Association for Research in Otolaryngology (2014) San Diego, CA MidWinter Meeting
12. Ferraro J. A., Ferguson R., Tympanic ECochG and conventional ABR: A combined approach for the identification of wave I and the I-V interwave interval. Ear Hear (1989) 10 161 166
13. Furman A. C., Kujawa S. G., Liberman M. C., Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. J Neurophysiol (2013) 110 577 586
14. Gaddam A., Ferraro J. A., ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode. Int J Audiol (2008) 47 499 504
15. Gao W. Y., Ding D. L., Zheng X. Y., A comparison of changes in the stereocilia between temporary and permanent hearing losses in acoustic trauma. Hear Res (1992) 62 27 41
16. Gorga M. P., Neely S. T., Bergman B., Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: Distortion product responses. J Acoust Soc Am (1993) 93 4 Pt 1 2050 2060
17. Gorga M. P., Neely S. T., Ohlrich B., From laboratory to clinic: A large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear Hear (1997) 18 440 455
18. Hall J., Hall J., Anatomy and physiology principles of auditory evoked potentials. New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses 2007a Boston, MA Pearson Education, Inc 35 57
19. Hall J., Hall J., ABR analysis and interpretation. New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses 2007b Boston, MA Pearson Education, Inc 171
20. Humes L. E., Joellenbeck L. M., Durch J. S., Noise and Military Service: Implications for Hearing Loss and Tinnitus (2005) Washington, DC National Academies Press 33 47
21. Kirby B. J., Kopun J. G., Tan H., Do "optimal" conditions improve distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance? Ear Hear (2011) 32 230 237
22. Konrad-Martin D., Dille M. F., McMillan G., Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol (2012) 23 18 35
23. Kujawa S. G., Liberman M. C., Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci (2009) 29 14077 14085
24. Lapsley Miller J. A., Marshall L., Heller L. M., Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am (2006) 120 280 296
25. Liberman M. C., Dodds L. W., Acute ultrastructural changes in acoustic trauma: Serial-section reconstruction of stereocilia and cuticular plates. Hear Res (1987) 26 65 88
26. Liberman M. C., Mulroy M. J., Hamernick R. P., Henderson D., Salvi R., Acute and chronic effects of acoustic trauma: Cochlear pathology and auditory nerve pathophysiology. New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (1982) New York, NY Raven Press 105 135
27. Lin H. W., Furman A. C., Kujawa S. G., Primary neural degeneration in the Guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol (2011) 12 605 616
28. Lopez-Poveda E. A., Barrios P., Perception of stochastically undersampled sound waveforms: A model of auditory deafferentation. Front Neurosci (2013) 7 124
29. Marshall L., Lapsley Miller J. A., Heller L. M., Detecting incipient inner-ear damage from impulse noise with otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am (2009) 125 995 1013
30. Megerson S. C., Development of a screening tool for identifying young people at risk for noise-induced hearing loss. Published Dissertation, University of Kansas (2010) Ann Arbor ProQuest
31. Melcher J. R., Kiang N. Y., Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. III: Identified cell populations. Hear Res (1996) 93 52 71
32. Møller A. R., Jho H. D., Yokota M., Contribution from crossed and uncrossed brainstem structures to the brainstem auditory evoked potentials: A study in humans. Laryngoscope (1995) 105 596 605
33. Muhr P., Rosenhall U., Self-Assessed auditory symptoms, noise exposure, and measured auditory function among healthy young Swedish men. Int J Audiol (2010) 49 317 325
34. Mulders W. H., Robertson D., Hyperactivity in the auditory midbrain after acoustic trauma: Dependence on cochlear activity. Neuroscience (2009) 164 733 746
35. Mulders W. H., Robertson D., Progressive centralization of midbrain hyperactivity after acoustic trauma. Neuroscience (2011) 192 753 760
36. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Fact Sheet: Work Related Hearing Loss (2001) Washington, DC National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Health and Human Services
37. Neely S. T., Liu Z., EMAV: Otoacoustic emission average. Tech Memo 17 (1993) Omaha, NE Boys Town National Research Hospital
38. Neitzel R., Seixas N., Goldman B., Contributions of non-occupational activities to total noise exposure of construction workers. Ann Occup Hyg (2004) 48 463 473
39. Neitzel R., Seixas N., Olson J., Nonoccupational noise: Exposures associated with routine activities. J Acoust Soc Am (2004) 115 237 245
40. Nordmann A. S., Bohne B. A., Harding G. W., Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res (2000) 139 13 30
41. O'Brien I., Wilson W., Bradley A., Nature of orchestral noise. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 124 926 939
42. Reeb-Whitaker C. K., Seixas N. S., Sheppard L., Accuracy of task recall for epidemiological exposure assessment to construction noise. Occup Environ Med (2004) 61 135 142
43. Robertson D., Johnstone B. M., Acoustic trauma in the Guinea pig cochlea: Early changes in ultrastructure and neural threshold. Hear Res (1980) 3 167 179
44. Sanchez T. G., Medeiros I. R., Levy C. P., Tinnitus in normally hearing patients: Clinical aspects and repercussions. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol (2005) 71 427 431
45. Saunders J. C., Dear S. P., Schneider M. E., The anatomical consequences of acoustic injury: A review and tutorial. J Acoust Soc Am (1985) 78 833 860
46. Schaette R., McAlpine D., Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: Physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci (2011) 31 13452 13457
47. Scheperle R. A., Goodman S. S., Neely S. T., Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration. J Acoust Soc Am (2011) 130 3882 3892
48. Scheperle R. A., Neely S. T., Kopun J. G., Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability. J Acoust Soc Am (2008) 124 288 300
49. Schwartz D. M., Morris M. D., Jacobson J. T., Jacobson J. T., The normal auditory brainstem response and its variants. Principles & Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials (1994) Needham Heights, MA Allyn and Bacon 123 153
50. Seixas N. S., Neitzel R., Stover B., 10-Year prospective study of noise exposure and hearing damage among construction workers. Occup Environ Med (2012) 69 643 650
51. Spoendlin H., Primary structural changes in the organ of Corti after acoustic overstimulation. Acta Otolaryngol (1971) 71 166 176
52. Stover L., Gorga M. P., Neely S. T., Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. J Acoust Soc Am (1996) 100 2 Pt 1 956 967
53. Zhao F., Manchaiah V. K., French D., Music exposure and hearing disorders: An overview. Int J Audiol (2010) 49 54 64