Auditory brainstem response latency in noise as a marker of cochlear synaptopathy

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 2016, Pages 3755-3764

  Mehraei, Golbarg ^a,b   Hickox, Ann E ^a,d   Bharadwaj, Hari M ^b,g   Goldberg, Hannah ^a   Verhulst, Sarah ^b,f   Charles Liberman, M ^a,d,e   Shinn Cunningham, Barbara G ^b,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Boston University   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^g MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem response; Auditory nerve loss; Cochlear synaptopathy; Hidden hearing loss; Temporal coding

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; COCHLEAR SYNAPTOPATHY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INNER EAR DISEASE; INNER HAIR CELL; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPIRAL LIGAMENT; SYNAPSE; TIME PERCEPTION; ANIMAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DISEASE MODEL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; INNER EAR; MOUSE; NOISE INJURY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EAR, INNER; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; MALE; MICE; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REACTION TIME; SYNAPSES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84961989775     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4460-15.2016     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abdala C, Folsom RC (1995) The development of frequency resolution in humans as revealed by the auditory brainstem response recorded with notched noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 98:921–930 CrossRef Medline
2. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59:390–412 CrossRef
3. Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C (2002) Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli.” J Acoust Soc Am 112: 1026–1036 CrossRef Medline
4. Bharadwaj HM, Verhulst S, Shaheen L, Liberman MC, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2014) Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound. Front Syst Neurosci 8:26 CrossRef Medline
5. Bharadwaj HM, Masud S, Mehraei G, Verhulst S, Shinn-Cunningham BG (2015) Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits. J Neurosci 35:2161–2172 CrossRef Medline
6. Bokil H, Andrews P, Kulkarni JE, Mehta S, Mitra PP (2010) Chronux: a platform for analyzing neural signals. J Neurosci Methods 192:146-151 CrossRef Medline
7. Bourien J, Tang Y, Batrel C, Huet A, Lenoir M, Ladrech S, Desmadryl G, Nouvian R, Puel JL, Wang J (2014) Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve. J Neurophysiol 112:1025–1039 CrossRef Medline
8. Burkard R, Hecox K (1983) The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. J Acoust SocAm 74:1204-1213 CrossRef Medline
9. Burkard R, Hecox KE (1987) The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus. J Acoust Soc Am 81:1050-1063 CrossRef Medline
10. Burkard RF, Sims D (2002) A comparison of the effects of broadband masking noise on the auditory brainstem response in young and older adults. Am J Audiol 11:13–22 CrossRef Medline
11. Burkard R, Trautwein P, Salvi R (1997) The effects of click level, click rate, and level of background masking noise on the inferior colliculus potential (ICP) in the normal and carboplatin-treated chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 102:3620-3627 CrossRef Medline
12. Chermak GD, Musiek FE (1997) Central auditory processing disorders: new perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
13. Costalupes JA (1985) Representation of tones in noise in the responses of auditory nerve fibers in cats. I. Comparison with detection thresholds. J Neurosci 5:3261–3269
14. Medline Dau T (2003) The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses. J Acoust Soc Am 113:936-950 CrossRef Medline
15. de Cheveigne´ A, Simon JZ (2008) Denoising based on spatial filtering. J Neurosci Methods 171:331–339 CrossRef Medline
16. Dreyer AA, Oxenham AJ (2008) Effects of level and background noise on interaural time difference discrimination for transposed stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 123:EL1–EL7 CrossRef Medline
17. Franklin DJ, McCoy MJ, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1992) Test/retest reliability of distortion product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 13:417-429 CrossRef Medline
18. Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2013) Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. J Neurophysiol 110:577–586 CrossRef Medline
19. Glasberg BR, Moore BC (1990) Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 47:103–138 CrossRef Medline
20. Grassi M, Soranzo A (2009) MLP: a MATLAB toolbox for rapid and reliable auditory threshold estimations. Behav Res Methods 41:20-28 CrossRef Medline
21. Harte JM, Pigasse G, Dau T (2009) Comparison of cochlear delay estimates using otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses. J Acoust Soc Am 126:1291–1301 CrossRef Medline
22. Hickox AE, Liberman MC (2014) Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus? J Neurophysiol 111:552–564 CrossRef Medline
23. Hind SE, Haines-Bazrafshan R, Benton CL, Brassington W, Towle B, Moore DR (2011) Prevalence of clinical referrals having hearing thresholds within normal limits. Int J Audiol 50:708-716 CrossRef Medline
24. Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997) Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997 CrossRef Medline
25. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2009) Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29:14077–14085 CrossRef Medline
26. Kumar G, Amen F, Roy D (2007) Normal hearing tests: is a further appointment really necessary? J R Soc Med 100:66 CrossRef Medline
27. Levitt H (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:Suppl 2:467. CrossRef Medline
28. Liberman MC (1978) Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a lownoise chamber. J Acoust Soc Am 63:442-455 CrossRef Medline
29. Liberman LD, Suzuki J, Liberman MC (2015) Dynamics of cochlear synaptopathy after acoustic overexposure. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:205–219 CrossRef Medline
30. Lobarinas E, Salvi R, Ding D (2013) Insensitivity of the audiogram to carboplatin induced inner hair cell loss in chinchillas. Hear Res 302:113–120 CrossRef Medline
31. Lopez-Poveda EA, Barrios P (2013) Perception of stochastically undersampled sound waveforms: a model of auditory deafferentation. Front Neurosci 7:124 CrossRef Medline
32. Makary CA, Shin J, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, Merchant SN (2011) Agerelated primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:711–717 CrossRef Medline
33. Markand ON (1994) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 11:319-342 CrossRef Medline
34. Mitchell C, Phillips DS, Trune DR (1989) Variables affecting the auditory brainstem response: audiogram, age, gender and head size. Hear Res 40: 75–85 CrossRef Medline
35. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1985) Neural generators of the auditory brainstem response. In: The auditory brainstem response (Jacobson JT, ed), pp 13-31 San Diego: College Hill.
36. Neely ST, Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Jesteadt W (1988) Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 83:652-656 CrossRef Medline
37. Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
38. Plack C, Baker D, Prendergast G (2014) Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends Hear 18:1–11
39. CrossRef Rhode W, Smith P (1985) Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers. Hear Res 114:159-168
40. Rhode W, Geisler CD, Kennedy DT (1978) Auditory nerve fiber response to wide-band noise and tone combinations. J Neurophysiol 41:692–704
41. Medline Schaalje BG, Mcbride JB, Fellingham GW (2002) Adequacy of approximations to distributions of test statistics in complex mixed linear models. J Agricult Biol Environ Stats 7:512–524
42. CrossRef Schaette R, McAlpine D (2011) Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 31:13452–13457 CrossRef Medline
43. Schmiedt RA, Mills JH, Boettcher FA (1996) Age-related loss of activity of auditory-nerve fibers. J Neurophysiol 76:2799-2803
44. Medline Sergeyenko Y, Lall K, Liberman MC, Kujawa SG (2013) Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline. J Neurosci 33:13686-13694 CrossRef Medline
45. Shaheen LA, Valero MD, Liberman MC (2015) Towards a diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy with envelope following responses. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:727–745 CrossRef Medline
46. Shera CA (2004) Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 25:86-97 CrossRef Medline
47. Simon H, Frisina RD, Walton JP (2004) Age reduces response latency of mouse inferior colliculus neurons to AM sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 116: 469–477 CrossRef Medline
48. Stamper GC, Johnson TA (2015) Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears. Ear Hear 36:172–184 CrossRef Medline
49. Young ED, Barta PE (1986) Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 79:426–442 CrossRef Medline