The Community Voice Method: Using participatory research and filmmaking to foster dialog about changing landscapes

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 434-444

  Cumming, Gabriel ^a   Norwood, Carla ^b  

^a Warren County Economic Development Commission   (United States)

^b Working Landscapes   (United States)

Author keywords

Amenity migration; Deliberation; Documentary film; Land use planning; Participatory research; Rural

Indexed keywords

DISTILLATION; LAND USE; MOTION PICTURES; RURAL AREAS;

AMENITY MIGRATION; DELIBERATION; DOCUMENTARY FILMS; LAND USE PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

AMENITY; CIVIL SOCIETY; LAND USE PLANNING; MEDIA INDUSTRY; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RURAL AREA; STAKEHOLDER;

MACON COUNTY [NORTH CAROLINA]; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84858286428     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Abelson J., Forest P.-G., Eyles J., Smith P., Martin E., Gauvin F.-P. Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine 2003, 57(2):239-251.
2. Beierle T.C. Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Studies Review 1999, 16:75-103.
3. Bernard R.H. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches 2002, Altamira, Walnut Creek, CA.
4. Brandenburg A.M., Carroll M.S. Your place or mine? The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society & Natural Resources 1995, 8:381-398.
5. Briggs C.L. Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research 1986, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Brown S.R. Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science 1980, Yale University Press, New Haven.
7. Campbell K.B. Theorizing the authentic: Identity, engagement, and public space. Admin and Society 2005, 36(6):688-705.
8. Carpini M.X.D., Cook F.L., Jacobs L.R. Public deliberations, discursive participation and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science 2007, 7:315-344.
9. Chambers S. Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 2003, 6:307-326.
10. Cheng A.S., Kruger L.E., Daniels S.E. Place as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda. Society & Natural Resources 2003, 16:87-104.
11. Chipeniuk R. Planning for amenity migration in Canada. Mountain Research and Development 2004, 24(4):327-335.
12. Cho S.-H., Newman D.H., Bowker J.M. Measuring rural homeowners' willingness to pay for land conservation easements. Forest Policy and Economics 2005, 7:757-770.
13. Cornwall A., Coelho V.S. Spaces for change? The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas 2007, Zed Books Ltd., London. A. Cornwall, V.S. Coelho (Eds.).
14. Cornwall A., Jewkes R. What is participatory research?. Social Science and Medicine 1995, 41(12):1667-1676.
15. Cox R. Environmental communication and the public sphere 2006, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
16. Cumming, G. B., 2007. Explorations in discursive ecology: Addressing landscape change with rural North Carolinians (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
17. Cumming G.B., Guffey S.J., Norwood C.M. Opportunities and challenge in community capacity building: Lessons from participatory research in Macon County, North Carolina. Partnerships for empowerment: Participatory research for community-based natural resource management 2008, 127-146. Earthscan, London. C. Wilmsen, W. Elmendorf, L. Fisher, J. Ross, B. Sarathy, G. Wells (Eds.).
18. Daniels S.E., Walker G.B. Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach 2001, Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT.
19. Davidoff P. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1965, 31(4):421-432.
20. Day D. Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept. Journal of Planning Literature 1997, 11:421-434.
21. Dryzek J.S. Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Dryzek J.S. Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory 2001, 29(5):651-669.
23. Dryzek J.S., Niemeyer S. Discursive representation. American Political Science Review 2008, 102:481-493.
24. Fairclough N. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research 2003, Routledge, London.
25. Forester J. Deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes 1999, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
26. Forester J. Participation as dialogue, debate, and negotiation: Entangled promises and practices. Governance reform under real-world conditions: Citizens, stakeholders, and voice 2008, 209-218. The World Bank, Washington, DC. S. Odugbemi, T. Jacobson (Eds.).
27. Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed 1981, Continuum, New York.
28. Gastil J. Political communication and deliberation 2008, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
29. Glover T.D., Stewart W.P., Gladdys K. Social ethics of landscape change: Toward community-based land-use planning. Qualitative Inquiry 2008, 14:384-401.
30. Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life 1959, Doubleday, New York.
31. Graber E.E. Newcomers and oldtimers: Growth and change in a mountain town. Rural Sociology 1974, 39:504-513.
32. Harper G.W., Lardon C., Rappaport J., Bangi A.K., Contreras R., Pedraza A. Community narratives: The use of narrative ethnography in participatory community research. Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action 2004, 199-217. American Psychological Association, Washington. L.A. Jason, C.B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. Taylor, M.I. Davis, J.A. Durlak, D.H. Isenberg (Eds.).
33. Hayward C., Simpson L., Wood L. Still left out in the cold: Problematising participatory research and development. Sociologia Ruralis 2004, 44(1):95-108.
34. Healey P. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1996, 23(2):217-234.
35. Healey P. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies 2006, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
36. Hendriks C.M. Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society's dual role in deliberative democracy. Political Studies 2006, 54:486-508.
37. Innes J.E., Booher D.E. Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice 2004, 5(4):419-436.
38. Israel B.A., Schulz A., Parker E., Becker A., Allen A., Guzman J.R. Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles. Community-based participatory research for health 2003, 53-76. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. M. Minkler, N. Wallerstein (Eds.).
39. Kruger L.E., Shannon M.A. Getting to know ourselves and our places through participation in civic social assessment. Society & Natural Resources 2000, 13:461-478.
40. Labov W. The transformation of experience in narrative. Language in the inner city: Studies in black English vernacular 1972, University of Pennsylvania Press, University City. W. Labov (Ed.).
41. Lando T. The public hearing process: A tool for citizen participation, or a path toward citizen alienation?. National Civic Review 2003, 92(1):73-82.
42. Levine P., Fung A., Gastil J. Future directions for public deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation 2005, 1(1):1-13.
43. Lewin K. Resolving social conflicts 1948, Harper, New York.
44. Lukensmeyer C.J., Brigham S. Taking democracy to scale: Creating a town hall meeting for the twenty-first century. National Civic Review 2002, 91(4):351-366.
45. Mansbridge J. Everyday talk in the deliberative system. Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement 1999, 211-239. Oxford University Press, New York. S. Macedo (Ed.).
46. Marcouiller D.W., Clendenning J.G., Kedzior R. Natural amenity-led development and rural planning. Journal of Planning Literature 2002, 16(4):515-542.
47. Mason R.J. Collaborative land use management: The quieter revolution in place-based planning 2008, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham.
48. McCarthy J. First world political ecology: Lessons from the wise use movement. Environment and Planning A 2002, 34:1281-1302.
49. McCarthy J. Rural geography: Globalizing the countryside. Progress in Human Geography 2008, 32(1):129-137.
50. McDowell M.J. The Bahktinian road to ecological insight. The ecocriticism reader: Landscapes in literary ecology 1996, 371-392. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA. C. Glotfelty, H. Fromm (Eds.).
51. Minkler M., Wallerstein N. Community-based participatory research for health 2003, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
52. Moss L. The amenity migrants: Seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures 2006, CABI, Wallingford, UK.
53. Nickerson R.S. Psychology and environmental change 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
54. Norwood, C. M., 2009. Making maps that matter? The role of geospatial information in addressing rural landscape change (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
55. Norwood C.M., Cumming G.B. Making maps that matter: Situating GIS within community conversations about changing landscapes. Cartographica 2012, 10.3138/carto.47.1.34.
56. Odum W.E. Environmental degradation and the tyranny of small decisions. BioScience 1982, 32:728-729.
57. Parkinson J. Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies 2003, 51:180-196.
58. Pateman C. Participation and democratic theory 1970, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
59. Pettit C.J., Raymond C.M., Bryan B.A., Lewis H. Identifying strengths and weaknesses of landscape visualisation for effective communication of future alternatives. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 100:231-241.
60. Plein C.L., Green K.E., Williams D.G. Organic planning: A new approach to public participation in local governance. The Social Science Journal 1998, 35(4):509-523.
61. Polletta F., Lee J. Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11. American Sociological Review 2006, 71(October):699-723.
62. Putnam R. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community 2000, Simon and Schuster, New York.
63. Renn O., Webler T., Wiedemann P. A need for discourse in citizen participation. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse 1995, 1-16. Kluwer, Dordrecht. O. Renn, T. Webler, P. Wiedemann (Eds.).
64. Rudel T.K. Situations and strategies in American land-use planning 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
65. Ryan R.L. Preserving rural character in New England: Local residents' perceptions of alternative residential development. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 61:19-35.
66. Ryan R.L. Comparing the attitudes of local residents, planners, and developers about preserving rural character in New England. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 75:5-22.
67. Sandercock L. Out of the closet: The importance of telling stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory and Practice 2003, 4(1):11-28.
68. Sanoff H. Community participation methods in design and planning 2000, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
69. Sargent F.O. Rural environmental planning 1976, University of Vermont, Vermont.
70. Schafft K.A., Greenwood D.J. The promise and dilemmas of participation: Action research, search conference methodology and community development. Community Development 2003, 34(1):18-35.
71. Senecah S.L. The trinity of voice: The role of practical theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes. Communication and public participation in environmental decision making 2004, 13-33. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY. S.P. Depoe, J.W. Delicath, M.-F.A. Elsenbeer (Eds.).
72. Simpson L. Aboriginal peoples and knowledge: Decolonizing our processes. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 2000, 21(2):137-148.
73. Smith P.D., McDonough M.H. Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 2001, 14:239-249.
74. Stewart S.I. Amenity migration. Trends 2000: Shaping the future, proceedings of the 5th outdoor recreation & tourism trends symposium 2002, 369-378. Michigan State University, Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Resources, East Lansing, MI. K. Luft, S. MacDonald (Eds.).
75. Stewart W.P., Liebert D., Larkin K.W. Community identities as visions for landscape change. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69:315-334.
76. Susskind L., Cruikshank J. Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes 1987, Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, New York.
77. Susskind L., McKearnan S., Thomas-Larmer J. The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement 1999, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
78. Wang C., Burris M.A. Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior 1997, 24(3):369-387.
79. Wilmsen C. Negotiating community, participation, knowledge, and power in participatory research. Partnerships for empowerment: Participatory research for community-based natural resource management 2008, 1-22. Earthscan, London. C. Wilmsen, W. Elmendorf, L. Fisher, J. Ross, B. Sarathy, G. Wells (Eds.).