Job Performance: Assessment Issues in Personnel Selection

The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 354-375

  Viswesvaran, Chockalingam ^a   Ones, Deniz S ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Construct domain; Emerging issues; Measurement methods; Sources of ratings

Indexed keywords

EID: 85002849363     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781405164221.ch16     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Albrecht, P. A., Glaser, E. M., & Marks, J. (1964). Validation of a multiple-assessment procedure for managerial personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 351-360.
2. Alonso, A. (2001). The relationship between cognitive ability, big jive, task and contextual performance: A metaanalysis. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Florida International University, Miami, FL.
3. Alonso, A., Viswesvaran, C, & Sanchez, J. I. (2001, April). Mediating roles of task and contextual performance on predictor validity: A meta-analysis. Poster presented at the 16th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
4. Anderson, N., Herriot, P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The practitioner-researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 391-411.
5. Austin, J. T, & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917-1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836-874.
6. Baier, D. E., &Dugan, R. D. (1957). Factors in sales success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 37-10.
7. Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting employees: Individual and organizational perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Barrett, G. V, Caldwell, M. S., & Alexander, R. A. (1989). The predictive stability of ability requirements for task performance: A critical reanalysis. Human Performance, 2, 167-181.
9. Bernardin, H. J., & Beany, R. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent-PWS.
10. Bernardin, H. J., & Pence, E. C. (1980). Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 60-66.
11. Blanz, E, & Ghiselli, E. E. (1972). The mixed standard scale: A new rating system. Personnel Psychology, 25, 185-199.
12. Blum, M. L., & Naylor, J. C. (1968). Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and socialfoundations. New York: Harper & Row.
13. Borman, W. C. (1974). The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 105-124.
14. Borman, W. C, & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
15. Brogden, H. E. (1946). An approach to the problem of differential prediction. Psychometrika, 11, 139-154.
16. Caligiuri, P. M. (2000). The Big Five personality characteristics as predictors of expatriate desire to terminate the assignment and supervisor-rated performance. Personnel Psychology, 53, 67-88.
17. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol- 1J 2nd ed., pp. 687-731). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
18. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Campbell, J. P., McHenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 313-333.
20. Church, A. H., & Bracken, D. W. (1997). Advancing the state of the art of 360 degree feedback. Group and Organization Management, 22, 149-161.
21. Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130-135.
22. Conner, J. (2000). Developing the global leaders of tomorrow. Human Resource Management, 39 (2 & 3), 147-158.
23. Conway, J. M., & Huffcut, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10, 331-360.
24. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
25. DeShon, R. (2002). Generalizability theory. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations (pp. 189-220). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Deshpande, S. P., & Viswesvaran, C. (1992). Is cross-cultural training of expatriate managers effective? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 295-310.
27. DeVries, D. L., Morrison, A. M., Shullman, S. L., & Gerlach, M. L. (1986). Performance appraisal on the line. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
28. DuBois, C. L. Z., Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1993). Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: Definitional issues, prediction, and white-black differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 205-211.
29. Facteau, J. D, & Craig, S. B. (2001). Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 215-227.
30. Goldberg, L. R. (1995). What the hell took so long? Donald Fiske and the big-five factor structure. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Advances in personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske. New York: Erlbaum.
31. Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. L. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 30-42.
32. Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement, and predictionfor personnel selection. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Gunderson, E. K. E., & Ryman, D. H. (1971). Convergent and discriminant validities of performance evaluations in extremely isolated groups. Personnel Psychology, 24, 715-724.
34. Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.
35. Helme, W. E., Gibson, N. A., & Brogden, H. E. (1957). An empirical test of shrinkage problems in personnel classification research. Personnel Board, Technical Research Note 84.
36. Hunt, S. T. (1996). Generic work behavior: An investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Personnel Psychology, 49, 51-83.
37. Hunter, J. E., Crosson, J. J., & Friedman, D. H. (1985). The validity of ASVABfor civilian and military job performance. Technical Report.
38. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correctingfor error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Kanter, R. M. (1995). World class: Thinking locally in a global economy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40. Klimoski, R. J., & London, M. (1974). Role of the rater in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 445-51.
41. Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72-107.
42. Lent, R. H., Aurbach, H. A., & Levin, L. S. (1971). Predictors, criteria, and significant results. Personnel Psychology, 24, 519-533.
43. Mace, C. A. (1935). Incentives: Some experimental studies. (Report 72). London: Industrial Health Research Board.
44. Malos, S. B. (1998). Current legal issues in performance appraisal. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 49-94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Morris, S. B., & Lobsenz, R. (2003). Evaluating personnel selection systems. In J. E. Edwards, J. C. Scott, & N. S. Raju (Eds.), The human resources program-evaluation handbook (pp. 109-129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Mount, M. K., Judge, T. A., Scullen, S. E., Sytsma, M. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (1998). Trait, rater, and level effects in 360-degree performance ratings. Personnel Psychology, 51, 557-576.
47. Murphy, K. R. (1989). Dimensions of job performance. In R. Dillon &J. Pelligrino (Eds.), Testing: Applied and theoretical perspectives (pp. 218-247). New York: Praeger.
48. Murphy, K. R. (Ed.). (2003). Validity generalization: A critical review. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Murphy, K. R., & DeShon, R. (2000). Inter-rater correlations do not estimate the reliability of job performance ratings. Personnel Psychology, 53, 873-900.
50. Nathan, B. R., & Alexander, R. A. (1988). A comparison of criteria for test validation: A meta-ana-lytical investigation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 517-535.
51. Norman, C. A., & Zawacki, R. A. (1991, December). Team appraisals - team approach. Quality Digest, 11, 68-75.
52. NunnallyJ. C, & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Integrity tests and other Criterion-focused Occupational Personality Scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31-39.
54. Oppler, S. H., Sager, C. E., McCloy, R. A., & Rosse, R. L. (1993, May). The role of performance determinants in the development of prediction equations. In E L. Schmidt (Chair), Job performance: Theories of determinants andfactor structure. Symposium conducted at the eighth annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychologists, San Francisco.
55. Outtz, J. L. (2002). The role of cognitive ability tests in employment selection. Human Performance, 15, 161-171.
56. Prien, E. P., & Kult, M. (1968). Analysis of performance criteria and comparison of a priori and empirically-derived keys for a forced-choice scoring. Personnel Psychology, 21, 505-513.
57. Reilly, R. R., & McGourty, J. (1998). Performance appraisal in team settings. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 244-277). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58. Roach, D. E., & Wherry, R. J. (1970). Performance dimensions of multi-line insurance agents. Personnel Psychology, 23, 239-250.
59. Ronan, W. W. (1963). A factor analysis of eleven job performance measures. Personnel Psychology, 16, 255-267.
60. Rothstein, H. R. (1990). Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 322-327.
61. Rush, C. H. (1953). A factorial study of sales criteria. Personnel Psychology, 6, 9-24.
62. Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Tenopyr, M. L., & Kehoe, J. (1985). Commentary on forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 697-798.
63. Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 482-186.
64. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Towards an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
65. Salgado, J. E, & Moscoso, S. (1996). Meta-analysis of interrater reliability of job performance ratings in validity studies of personnel selection. Perceptual and Motor Skilb, 83, 1195-1201.
66. Schmidt, F. L. (1980). The measurement of job performance. Unpublished manuscript.
67. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Causal modeling of processes determining job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 89-92.
68. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1, 199-223.
69. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Pearlman, K., & Rothstein, H. R. (1985). Forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 697-798.
70. Schmidt, F. L., Viswesvaran, C, & Ones, D. S. (2000). Reliability is not validity and validity is not reliability. Personnel Psychology, 53, 901-912.
71. Seashore, S. E., Indik, B. P., & Georgopoulos, B. S. (1960). Relationships among criteria of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 195-202.
72. Sinangil, H. K., & Ones, D. S. (2001). Expatriate management. In N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, & organizational psychology: Vol. 1, Personnel psychology (pp. 424-443). London: Sage.
73. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 655-663.
74. Smith, P. C. (1976). Behavior, results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 745-775). Chicago: Rand McNally.
75. Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20, 503-530.
76. Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
77. Swezey, R. W, & Salas, E. (Eds.). (1992). Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
78. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York: Wiley.
79. Viswesvaran, C. (1993). Modeling job performance: Is there a general factor? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
80. Viswesvaran, C. (2003). [Review of Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002, 591 pages.]. Personnel Psychology, 56, 283-286.
81. Viswesvaran, C, & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865-885.
82. Viswesvaran, C, & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216-227.
83. Viswesvaran, C, Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.
84. Viswesvaran, C, Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2002). The moderating influence of job performance dimensions on convergence of supervisory and peer ratings of job performance: Uncon-founding construct-level convergence and rating difficulty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 345-354.
85. Viswesvaran, C, Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (in press). Is there a general factor in job performance ratings? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology.
86. Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540-555.
87. Whisler, T. L., & Harper, S. F. (Eds.). (1962). Performance appraisal: Research and practice. New York: Holt.