Reliability is not validity and validity is not reliability

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 901-912

  Schmidt, Frank L ^a   Viswesvaran, Chockaungam ^b   Ones, Deniz S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034552414     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb02422.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bommer WH, Johnson JL, Rich GA, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 48, 587-605.
2. Campbell JP, McHenry JJ, Wise LL. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 43, 313-333.
3. Cronbach LJ. (1947). Test reliability: Its meaning and determination. Psychometrika, 12, 1-16.
4. Guilford JP. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Hoyt WT, Kerns MD. (1999). Magnitude and moderators of bias in observer ratings: A meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 403-424.
6. Hunter JE. (1983). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance and supervisor ratings. In Landy FJ, Zedeck S, Cleveland JN (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257-266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. (1996a). Cumulative research knowledge and social policy formulation: The critical role of meta-analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 324-347.
8. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. (1996b). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 447-472.
9. Le H, Schmidt FL, Lauver K. (2000). How reliable are measures of job satisfaction: New answers from generalizability theory. Paper under review.
10. McCrae RR, Stone SV, Fagan PJ, Costa PT Jr. (1998). Identifying causes of disagreement between self-reports and spouse ratings of personality. Journal of Personality, 66, 286-313.
11. Mount MK, Judge TA, Scullen SE, Sytsma MR, Hezlett SA. (1998). Trait, rater, and level effects in 360-degree performance ratings. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 51, 557-576.
12. Murphy KR, DeShon R. (2000). Interrater correlations do not estimate the reliability of job performance ratings. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 53, 873-900.
13. Nunnally JC. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
14. Rothstein HR. (1990). Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 322-327.
15. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1, 199-223.
16. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. (1999). Theory testing and measurement error. Intelligence, 27, 183-198.
17. Thorndike RL. (1949). Personnel selection. New York: Wiley.
18. Traub RE. (1994). Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and applications. London: Sage.
19. Viswesvaran C, Ones DS. (2000). Measurement error in "Big Five Factors of personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 224-235.
20. Viswesvaran C, Ones DS, Schmidt FL. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.