Meta-analysis of interrater reliability of job performance ratings in validity studies of personnel selection

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 85, Issue 3 PART 2, 1996, Pages 1195-1201

  Salgado, Jesús F ^a   Moscoso, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009925616     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.3f.1195     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. GHISELLI, E. E. (1966) The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: Wiley.
2. GHISELLI, E. E. (1973) The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 23, 461-478.
3. HARTIGAN, J. A., & WIGDOR, A. K. (1989) Fairness in employment testing: validity generalization minority and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
4. HUNTER, J. E. (1980) Validity generalization for 12000 jobs: an application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, DC: US Employment Service, US Department of Labor.
5. HUNTER, J. E., & HIRSH, H. R. (1987) Applications of meta-analysis. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. London: Wiley. Pp. 321-357.
6. HUNTER, J. E., & HUNTER, R. F. (1984) Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
7. HUNTER, J. E., & SCHMIDT, F. L. (1990) Methods of meta-analysis. correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. KING, L. M., HUNTER, J. E., & SCHMIDT, F. L. (1980) Halo in multidimensional forced-choice performance evaluation scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 507-516.
9. ROBERTSON, I. T., & KINDER, A. (1993) Personality and job competences: the criterion-related validity of some personality variables. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 225-244.
10. ROTHSTEIN, H. R. (1990) Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 322-327.
11. SALGADO, J. F. (submitted) Sample size in validity studies of personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
12. SCHMIDT, F. L., & HUNTER, J. E. (1977) Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.
13. SCHMIDT, F. L., & HUNTER, J. E. (1980) The future of criterion-related validity. Personnel Psychology, 33, 41-60.
14. SCHMIDT, F. L., & HUNTER, J. E. (1981) Employment testing: old theories and new research findings. American Psychologist, 36, 1128-1137.
15. SCHMIDT, F. L., & HUNTER, J. E. (1995) The measurement errors in the applied research: answers to 27 scenarios. (Unpublished manuscript, Department of Management and Organizations, Univer. of Iowa)
16. SCHMITT, N., GOODING, R. Z., NOE, R. D., & KIRSCH, M. (1984) Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.
17. SCHMIDT, F. L., HUNTER, J. E., PEARLMAN, K. E., & SHANE, G. S. (1979) Further test of the Schmidt-Hunter Bayesian validity generalization procedure. Personnel Psychology, 32, 257-281.
18. SCHMIDT, F. L., PEARLMAN, K. E., HUNTER, J. E., & HIRSCH, H. R. (1985) Forty questions about validity generalization and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 697-798.