Corrigendum to: Unsupervised Classification During Time-Series Model Building (Multivariate Behavioral Research, (2017), 52, 2, (129-148), 10.1080/00273171.2016.1256187);Unsupervised Classification During Time-Series Model Building

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 129-148

  Gates, Kathleen M ^a   Lane, Stephanie T ^a   Varangis, E ^a   Giovanello, K ^a   Guiskewicz, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

clustering; fMRI; intensive longitudinal; SEM; time series analysis

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; FOOTBALL; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MODEL; RELIABILITY; SCIENTIST; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; ATHLETE; BRAIN; BRAIN CONCUSSION; BRAIN MAPPING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; INJURIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME FACTOR; UNITED STATES;

ALGORITHMS; ATHLETES; BRAIN; BRAIN CONCUSSION; BRAIN MAPPING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FOOTBALL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85002131253     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1360681     Document Type: Erratum

References (83)

1. Babbin, S. F., Velicer, W. F., Aloia, M. S., & Kushida, C. A., (2015). Identifying longitudinal patterns for individuals and subgroups:An example with adherence to treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 91–108. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.958211
2. Beltz, A. M., Beekman, C., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Buss, K. A., (2013). Mapping temporal dynamics in social interactions with unified structural equation modeling:A description and demonstration revealing time-dependent sex differences in play behavior. Applied Developmental Science, 17(3), 152–168. doi:10.1080/10888691.2013.805953
3. Beltz, A. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M., (2015). A posteriori model validation for the temporal order of directed functional connectivity maps. Frontiers in Neuroscience:Brain Imaging Methods, 9, article 304. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00304.
4. Beltz, A. M., & Molenaar, P. C., (2016). Dealing with multiple solutions in structural vector autoregressive models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 357–373.
5. Boker, S. M., & Bisconti, T. L., (2006). Dynamical systems modeling in aging research. In C. S., Bergeman & S. M., Boker (Eds.), Quantitative Methodology in Aging Research (pp. 185–229).Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
6. Bollen, K. A., (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
7. Brown, T. A., (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY:Guilford Press.
8. Browne, M. W., & Zhang, G., (2005). DyFA 2.03 user guide. Retrieved July 2016 from http:// faculty.psy.ohio-state.edu/browne/software.php
9. Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K. S., & Rhymer, R. M., (1947). P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysiological source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika, 12(4), 267–288. doi:10.1007/BF02288941
10. Chow, S. M., Ram, N., Boker, S. M., Fujita, F., & Clore, G., (2005). Emotion as a thermostat:Representing emotion regulation using a damped oscillator model. Emotion, 5(2), 208. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.208
11. Cohen, J., (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Deboeck, P. R., (2013). Dynamical systems and models of continuous time. In T. Little (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods (pp. 411–431). New York, NY:Guilford Press.
13. Dosenbach, N. U., Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E., (2008). A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(3), 99–105. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.001
14. Dungey, M., & Pagan, A., (2000). A structural VAR model of the Australian economy. Economic Record, 76(235). doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2000.tb00030.x
15. Eichler, M., (2005). A graphical approach for evaluating effective connectivity in neural systems. Philisophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B, 360,953–967. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1641
16. Eichler, M., (2010). Graphical Gaussian modelling of multivariate time series with latent variables. Journal of Machine Learning Research W&CP, 9, 193–200.
17. Engle, R. F., (1984). Wald, likelihood ratio, and Lagrange multiplier tests in econometrics. Handbook of Econometrics, 2, 775–826. doi:10.1016/S1573-4412(84)02005-5
18. Fair, D. A, Nigg, J. T., Iyer, S., Bathula, D., Mills, K. L., Dosenbach, N. U. F., & Milham, M. P., (2012). Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 6, 80. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2012.00080
19. Finn, E. S., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., Rosenberg, M. D., Huang, J., Chun, M. M., & Constable, R. T., (2015). Functional connectome fingerprinting:Identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 18(11), 1664–1671. doi:10.1038/nn.4135
20. Fortunato, S., (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3–5), 75–174. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002
21. Friston, K. J., (2011). Functional and effective connectivity:A review. Brain Connectivity, 1(1). doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008
22. Gates, K. M., Henry, T. R., Steinley, D., & Fair, D. A., (2016). A Monte Carlo evaluation of weighted community detection algorithms. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. Advance online publication. doi:10.3389/fninf.2016.00045
23. Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M., (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63(1), 310–319. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026
24. Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Hillary, F. G., Ram, N., & Rovine, M. J., (2010). Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping:An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1118–1125. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.117
25. Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Iyer, S. P., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A., (2014). Organizing heterogeneous samples using community detection of GIMME-derived resting state functional networks. PloS One, 9(3), e91322. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091322
26. Goebel, R., Roebroeck, A., Kim, D. S., & Formisano, E., (2003). Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 21(10), 1251–1261. PMID:14725933
27. Gonzales, J. E., & Ferrer, E., (2014). Individual pooling for group-based modeling under the assumption of ergodicity. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(3), 245–260. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.902298
28. Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D., (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry:Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(4), 636–645. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636
29. Granger, C. W. J., (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
30. Guskiewicz, K. M., & Mihalik, J. P., (2011). Biomechanics of sport concussion:Quest for the elusive injury threshold. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 39(1), 4–11.
31. Hillary, F. G., Medaglia, J. D., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Slocomb, J., Peechatka, A., & Good, D. C., (2011). Examining working memory task acquisition in a disrupted neural network. Brain:A Journal of Neurology, 134(5), 435–445. doi:10.1093/brain/awr043
32. Hubert, L., & Arabie, P., (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2(1), 193–218. doi:10.1007/BF01908075
33. Kaplan, D., (1991). On the modification and predictive validity of covariance structure models. Quality and Quantity, 25(1), 307–314. doi:10.1007/BF00167535
34. Karrer, B., Levina, E., and Newman, M. E. J., (2008). Robustness of community structure in networks. Physical Review Letters E, 77(4). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.77.046119
35. Karunanayaka, P., Eslinger, P. J., Wang, J.-L., Weitekamp, C. W., Molitoris, S., Gates, K. M., & Yang, Q. X., (2014). Networks involved in olfaction and their dynamics using independent component analysis and unified structural equation modeling. Human Brain Mapping, 35(5), 2055–2072. doi:10.1002/hbm.22312
36. Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P. M., & Ernst, T., (2007). Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 28(2), 85–93. doi:10.1002/hbm.20259
37. Kirchner, W. K., (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352–358. PMID:13539317
38. Lancichinetti, A., & Fortunato, S., (2011). Limits of modularity maximization in community detection. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 84. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.84.066122
39. Lane, S. T., Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M., (2016). Gimme:Group iterative multiple model estimation [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gimme
40. Laumann, T. O., Gordon, E. M., Adeyemo, B., Snyder, A. Z., Joo, S. J., Chen, M.-Y., … Petersen, S. E., (2015). Functional system and areal organization of a highly sampled individual human brain. Neuron, 87(3), 657–670. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.037
41. Liao, T. W., (2005). Clustering of time series data—a survey. Pattern recognition, 38(11), 1857–1874.
42. Lüktepohl, H., (1982). Non-causality due to omitted variables. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2–3), 367–378. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(82)90011-2
43. MacCallum, R. C., (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 107–120. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.107
44. MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B., (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure and the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504. PMID:16250105
45. MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R., (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 185–199. PMID:8346326
46. Marrelec, G., Krainik, A., Duffau, H., Pélégrini-Issac, M., Lehéricy, S., Doyon, J., & Benali, H., (2006). Partialcorrelation for functional brain interactivity investigationin functional MRI. NeuroImage, 32(1), 228–237. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.057
47. Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P., (2015). Maximin effects in inhomogeneous large-scale data. The Annals of Statistics, 43(4), 1801–1830. doi:10.1214/15-AOS1325
48. Milligan, G. W., Soon, S. C., & Sokol, L. M., (1983). The effect of cluster size, dimensionality, and the number of clusters on recovery of true cluster structure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 5(1), 40–47. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1983.4767342
49. Molenaar, P. C. M., (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 50(2), 181–202. doi:10.1007/BF02294246
50. Molenaar, P. C. M., (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science:Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement:Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 2(4), 201–218. doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
51. Molenaar, P. C., (2007). Psychological methodology will change profoundly due to the necessity to focus on intra-individual variation. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 35–40. doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9011-1
52. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G., (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
53. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R., (2012). Merging the idiographic filter with dynamic factor analysis to model process. Applied Developmental Science, 16(4), 210–219. doi:10.1080/10888691.2012.722884
54. Mumford, J. A., & Ramsey, J. D., (2014). Bayesian networks for fMRI:A primer. NeuroImage, 86, 573–582. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.020
55. Nesselroade, J. R., Gerstorf, D., Hardy, S. A., & Ram, N., (2007). Focus article:Idiographic filters for psychological constructs. Measurement, 5(4), 217–235. doi:10.1080/15366360701741807
56. Newman, M. E., (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(6), 066133. doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103
57. Nichols, T. T., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Wilson, S. J., (2013). Greater BOLD activity but more efficient connectivity is associated with better cognitive performance within a sample of nicotine-deprived smokers. Addiction Biology, 19(5), 931–940.doi:10.1111/adb.12060
58. Orman, G., & Labatut, V., (2009). A comparison of community detection algorithms on artificial networks. In J., Gama, V. S., Costa, A. M., Jorge, & P. B., Brazdil (Eds.), Discovery Science (pp. 242–256). Berlin, Germany:Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
59. Ou, L., Hunter, M.D., & Chow, S-M., (2016). dynr:Dynamic modeling in R [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package = dynr
60. Pons, P., & Latapy, M., (2006). Computing communities in large networks using random walks. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 10(2), 191–218. doi:10.7155/jgaa.00124
61. Porter, M. A., Onnela, J.-P., & Mucha, P. J., (2009). Communities in networks. Notices of the AMS, 56, 1082–1097. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002
62. Pourahmadi, M., & Noorbaloochi, S., (2016). Multivariate time series analysis of neuroscience data:Some challenges and opportunities. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 37, 12–15. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.12.006
63. Price, R. B., Lane, S., Gates, K., Kraynak, T. E., Horner, M. S., Thase, M. E., & Siegle, G. J., (2016). Parsing heterogeneity in brain connectivity of depressed and healthy adults during positive mood. Biological Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.023
64. Ramsey, J. D., Hanson, S. J., & Glymour, C., (2011). Multi-subject search correctly identifies causal connections and most causal directions in the DCM models of the Smith et al. simulation study. NeuroImage, 58(3), 838–848. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.068
65. Ramsey, J. D., Hanson, S. J., Hanson, C., Halchenko, Y. O., Poldrack, R. A., & Glymour, C., (2010). Six problems for causal inference from fMRI. NeuroImage, 49(2), 1545–1558. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.065
66. Ramsey, J. D., Sanchez-Romero, R., & Glymour, C., (2014). Non-Gaussian methods and high-pass filters in the estimation of effective connections. NeuroImage, 84, 986–1006. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.062
67. Ravishankar, N., Hosking, J. R. M., & Mukhopadhyay, J., (2010). Spectrum-based comparison of multivariate time series. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 12(4), 749–762. doi:10.1007/s11009-010-9180-0
68. Richardson, T., & Spirtes, P., (2002). Ancestral graph Markov models. Annals of Statistics, 30(4), 962–1030.
69. Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O., (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity:Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage, 52(3), 1059–1069. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
70. Seghier, M. L., & Price, C. J., (2016). Visualising inter-subject variability in fMRI using threshold-weighted overlap maps. Scientific reports, 6, 20170. doi:10.1038/srep20170
71. Silk, T., Vance, A., Rinehart, N., Egan, G., O’Boyle, M., Bradshaw, J. L., & Cunnington, R., (2005). Fronto-parietal activation in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type:Functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 187(3), 282–283. doi:10.1192/bjp.187.3.282
72. Smith, S. M., (2012). The future of FMRI connectivity. NeuroImage, 62(2), 1257–1266. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.022
73. Smith, S. M., Miller, K. L., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Webster, M., Beckmann, C. F., Nichols, T. E., & Woolrich, M. W., (2011). Network modelling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage, 54(2), 875–891. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063
74. Sörbom, D., (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54(3), 371–384. doi:10.1007/BF02294623
75. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. N., & Scheines, R., (2000). Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
76. Steinley, D., (2004). Properties of the Hubert-Arabie adjusted Rand index. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 386–396. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.386
77. van den Heuvel, M. P., & Sporns, O., (2011). Rich-club organization of the human connectome. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(44), 15775–15786.
78. Voelkle, M., Oud, H., & Driver, C., (2016). ctsem:Continuous time structural equation modeling [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package = ctsem
79. Volkmar, F. R., Lord, C., Bailey, A., Schultz, R. T., & Klin, A., (2004). Autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 45(1), 135–170. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00317.x
80. Wang, D., Buckner, R. L., Fox, M. D., Holt, D. J., Holmes, A. J., Stoecklein, S., & Liu, H., (2015). Parcellating cortical functional networks in individuals. Nature Neuroscience, 18(12), 1853–1860. doi:10.1038/nn.4164
81. Yang, J., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P., & Li, P., (2015). Neural changes underlying successful second language word learning:An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 33, 29–49. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.09.004
82. Yang, Z., Xu, Y., Xu, T., Hoy, C. W., Handwerker, D. A., Chen, G., & Bandettini, P. A., (2014). Brain network informed subject community detection in early-onset schizophrenia. Scientific Reports, 4. doi:10.1038/srep05549
83. Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., & Bullmore, E., (2012). On the use of correlation as a measure of network connectivity. NeuroImage, 60(4), 2096–2106. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.001