Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: A systematic review

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 65-75

  Rose, Alice ^a   Rosewilliam, Sheeba ^b   Soundy, Andrew ^b  

^a Bristol North Rehabilitation Centre   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Goal setting; Rehabilitation; Shared decision making; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA EXTRACTION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOAL ATTAINMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CARE; REVIEW; ADULT; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DISABLED PERSON; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; PROCEDURES; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION CENTER;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DISABLED PERSONS; GOALS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION CENTERS;

EID: 84997674075     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.030     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. [1] Care Quality Commission, Inpatient Survey 2014. 2014, Care Quality Commission, London.
2. [2] Department of Health, Department of Health Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. 2010, Department of Health, London.
3. [3] The King's Fund, Making Shared Decision-making a Reality: No Decision about Me without Me. 2011, The King's Fund, London.
4. [4] NHS England, Five Year Forward View. 2014, NHS England, London.
5. [5] The Health Foundation, Helping Measure Person-Centred Care. 2014, The Health Foundation, London.
6. [6] Rosewilliam, S., Roskell, C.A., Pandyan, A.D., A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin. Rehabil. 25 (2011), 501–514.
7. [7] Royal College of Physicians, National Clinical Guideline for Stroke. 4th ed., 2012, Royal College of Physicians, London.
8. [8] Department of Health, The National Service Framework for Long-term Conditions. 2005, Department of Health, Leeds.
9. [9] Tomori, K., Uezu, S., Kinjo, S., Ogahara, K., Nagatani, R., Higashi, T., Utilization of the iPad application: aid for decision-making in occupation choice. Occup. Ther. Int. 19 (2012), 88–97.
10. [10] Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T., Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc. Sci. Med. 44 (1997), 681–692.
11. [11] Turner-Stokes, L., Rose, H., Ashford, S., Singer, B., Patient engagement and satisfaction with goal planning: impact on outcome from rehabilitation. Int. J. Ther. Rehabil. 22 (2015), 210–216.
12. [12] Scobbie, L., McLean, D., Dixon, D., Duncan, E., Wyke, S., Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation: a process evaluation. BMC Health Serv. Res. 13 (2013), 1–13.
13. [13] Van De Weyer, R.C., Ballinger, C., Playford, E.D., Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: staff perspectives. Disabil. Rehabil. 32 (2010), 1419–1427.
14. [14] Leach, E., Cornwell, P., Fleming, J., Haines, T., Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disabil. Rehabil. 32 (2010), 159–172.
15. [15] Brown, M., Levack, W., McPherson, K.M., Dean, S.G., Reed, K., Weatherall, M., Taylor, W.J., Survival, momentum, and things that make me me: patients’ perceptions of goal setting after stroke. Disabil. Rehabil. 36 (2014), 1020–1026.
16. [16] Holliday, R.C., Ballinger, C., Playford, E.D., Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: patients’ perspectives. Disabil. Rehabil. 29 (2007), 389–394.
17. [17] Maitra, K.K., Erway, F., Perception of client-centered practice in occupational therapists and their clients. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 60 (2006), 298–310.
18. [18] Young, C.A., Manmathan, G.P., Ward, J.C., Perceptions of goal setting in a neurological rehabilitation unit: a qualitative study of patients, carers and staff. J. Rehabil. Med. 40 (2008), 190–194.
19. [19] Levack, W.M.M., Dean, S.G., Siegert, R.J., McPherson, K.M., Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ. Couns. 85 (2011), 206–213.
20. [20] Schoeb, V., Staffoni, L., Parry, R., Pilnick, A., “What do you expect from physiotherapy?”: a detailed analysis of goal setting in physiotherapy. Disabil. Rehabil. 36 (2014), 1679–1686.
21. [21] Rosewilliam, S., Sintler, C., Pandyan, A.D., Skelton, J., Roskell, C.A., Is the practice of goal-setting for patients in acute stroke care patient-centred and what factors influence this? A qualitative study. Clin. Rehabil. 7 (2015), 1–12.
22. [22] Sugavanam, T., Mead, G., Bulley, C., Donaghy, M., van Wijck, F., The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation—a systematic review. Disabil. Rehabil. 35 (2013), 177–190.
23. [23] Couet, N., Desroches, S., Robitaille, H., Leblanc, A., Turcotte, S., Elwyn, G., Légaré, F., Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 18 (2015), 542–561.
24. [24] Burton, D., Blundell, N., Jones, M., Fraser, A., Elwyn, G., Shared decision-making in cardiology: do patients want it and do doctors provide it. Patient Educ. Couns. 80 (2010), 173–179.
25. [25] Vaillancourt, H., Légaré, F., Lapointe, A., Deschênes, S.M., Desroches, S., Assessing patients involvement in decision making during the nutritional consultation with a dietician. Health Expect. 17 (2014), 545–554.
26. [26] Flierler, W.J., Nübling, M., Kasper, J., Heidegger, T., Implementation of shared decision making in anaesthesia and its influence on patient satisfaction. Anaesthesia 68 (2013), 713–722.
27. [27] Thomas, J., Harden, A., Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8 (2008), 1–10.
28. [28] Pope, C., Mays, N., Popay, J., Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Research: A Guide to Methods. 2007, Open University Press, Berkshire, England.
29. [29] Weed, M., A potential method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research: issues in the development of meta-interpretation. Int. J. Social Res. Methodol. 11 (2008), 13–28.
30. [30] in: J.P.T. Higgins, S. Green (eds.). Cochrane reviewer's handbook 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org, 2011 (accessed 08.09.15).
31. [31] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6 (2009), 1–6.
32. [32] Shaw, R., Booth, A., Sutton, A., Miller, T., Smith, J., Young, B., Jones, D., Dixon-Woods, M., Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 4 (2004), 1–5.
33. [33] Cooke, A., Smith, D., Booth, A., Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual. Health Res. 22 (2012), 1435–1443.
34. [34] World Health Organisation, Health Topics: Rehabilitation. 2015 (accessed 01.12.15) http://www.who.int/topics/rehabilitation/en/.
35. [35] van Teijlingen, E., Hundley, V., The Importance of Pilot Studies. Social Research Update, 35. 2001 (accessed 01.12.15) http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU35.html.
36. [36] Suresh, S., Nursing Research and Statistics. second ed., 2015, Elsevier, India.
37. [37] Collins, H., Creative Research: the Theory and Practice of Research for the Creative Industries. 2010, AVA Publishing, Switzerland.
38. [38] Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., Craig, J., Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 18 (2007), 349–357.
39. [39] Soundy, A., Condon, N., Patient's experiences of maintaining mental well-being and hope within motor neurone disease: a thematic synthesis. Front. Psychol. 6 (2015), 1–13.
40. [40] Soundy, A., Roskell, C., Elder, T., Collett, J., Dawes, H., The psychological processes of adaptation and hope in patients with multiple sclerosis: a thematic synthesis. Open J. Ther. Rehabil., 2016 (in press.
41. [41] Gallo, V., Egger, M., McCormack, V., Farmer, P.B., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Kirsch-Volders, M., Matullo, G., Phillips, D.H., Schoket, B., Stromberg, U., Vermeulen, R., Wild, C., Porta, M., Vineis, P., STrengthening the reporting of OBservational studies in epidemiology-Molecular epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE statement. PLoS Med. 8 (2011), 1–12.
42. [42] Dixon-Woods, M., Sutton, A., Shaw, R., Miller, T., Smith, J., Young, B., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D., Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 12 (2007), 42–47.
43. [43] Dalton, C., Farrell, R., De Souza, A., Wujanto, E., McKenna-Slade, A., Thompson, S., Liu, C., Greenwood, R., Patient inclusion in goal setting during early inpatient rehabilitation after acquired brain injury. Clin. Rehabil. 26 (2012), 165–173.
44. [44] Holliday, R.C., Cano, S., Freeman, J.A., Playford, E.D., Should patients participate in clinical decision making? An optimised balance block design controlled study of goal setting in a rehabilitation unit. J. Neurol. Neurosur. Psychiatry 78 (2007), 576–580.
45. [45] Lloyd, A., Roberts, A.R., Freeman, J.A., ‘Finding a balance’ in involving patients in goal setting early after stroke: a physiotherapy perspective. Physiother. Res. Int. 19 (2014), 147–157.
46. [46] Byrnes, M., Beilby, J., Ray, P., McLennan, R., Ker, J., Schug, S., Patient-focused goal planning process and outcome after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: quantitative and qualitative audit. Clin. Rehabil. 26 (2012), 1141–1149.
47. [47] Hibbard, J., Gilbert, H., Supporting People to Manage Their Health: an Introduction to Patient Activation. 2014, The King's Fund, London.
48. [48] Shay, L.A., Lafata, J.E., Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med. Decis. Making 35 (2015), 114–131.
49. [49] Joseph-Williams, N., Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ. Couns. 94 (2014), 291–309.
50. [50] Hoffmann, T.C., Bennett, S., Tomsett, C., Del Mar, C., Brief training of student clinicians in shared decision making: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29 (2014), 844–849.
51. [51] Rodriguez, H.P., Anastario, M.P., Frankel, R.M., Odigie, E.G., Rogers, W.H., von Glahn, T., Safran, D.G., Can teaching agenda-setting skills to physicians improve clinical interaction quality? A controlled intervention. BMC Med. Educ. 8 (2008), 1–7.
52. [52] Stacey, D., Murray, M.A., Légaré, F., Sandy, D., Menard, P., O'Connor, A., Decision coaching to support shared decision making: a framework, evidence, and implications for nursing practice, education, and policy. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 5 (2008), 25–35.
53. [53] Gobat, N., Kinnersley, P., Gregory, J.W., Robling, M., What is agenda setting in the clinical encounter? Consensus from literature review and expert consultation. Patient Educ. Couns. 98 (2015), 822–829.