"what do you expect from physiotherapy?": A detailed analysis of goal setting in physiotherapy

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 20, 2014, Pages 1679-1686

  Schoeb, Veronika ^a   Staffoni, Liliana ^a   Parry, Ruth ^b   Pilnick, Alison ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES WESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication; Conversation analysis; Goal setting; Physiotherapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY; SWITZERLAND; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PHYSICAL THERAPISTS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOFTWARE; SWITZERLAND; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 84911953882     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.867369     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Am Psychol 2002;57:705-17.
2. Scobbie L, Wyke S, Dixon D. Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:321-33.
3. Physioswiss. Profil professionnel de la physiothérapie. Sursee: Swiss Physiotherapy Association; 2006.
4. Wade D. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:291-5.
5. Bovend'Eerdt TJH, Botell RE, Wade, DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:352-61.
6. Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2011;25:501-14.
7. Levack WMM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, McPherson KM. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:206-13.
8. Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, et al. The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation-A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:177-90.
9. Parry R. Communication during goal-setting in physiotherapy treatment sessions. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:668-82.
10. Barnard RA, Cruice MN, Playford ED. Strategies used in the pursuit of achievability during goal setting in rehabilitation. Qual Health Res 2010;20:239-50.
11. Heritage J. Questioning in medicine. In: Freed AF, Ehrlich S, eds. "Why do you ask?": the function of questions in institutional discourse. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2010:42-68.
12. Heritage J, Clayman S. Talk in action: interactions, identities and institutions. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
13. Clayman SE, Gill VT. Conversation analysis. In: Bryman HM, ed. Handbook of data analysis. London: Sage; 2004:589-606.
14. Barnes R. Conversation analysis: a practical resource in the health care setting. Med Educ 2005;39:113-15.
15. Heritage J, Maynard DW. Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: University Press; 2006.
16. Pilnick A. "Why didn't you just say that?": dealing with issues of asymmetry, knowledge and competence in the pharmacist/client encounter. Sociol Health Ill 1998;20:29-51.
17. Jones A. Creating history: documents and patient participation in nurse-patient interviews. Soc Health Ill 2009;31:907-23.
18. Denman A, Wilkinson, R. Applying conversation analysis to traumatic brain injury: investigating touching another person in everyday social interaction. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:243-52.
19. Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care. Health Expect 2001;4:58-70.
20. Parry R. Practitioners' accounts for treatment actions and recommendations in physiotherapy: when do they occur, how are they structured, what do they do? Soc Health Ill 2009;31:835-53.
21. Martin C. From other to self. Learning as interactional change [dissertation]. Sweden: University of Uppsala; 2004.
22. Ten Have P. Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage; 1999.
23. WMA (World Medical Association). Declaration of Helsinki-ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2008. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html [last accessed 20 Feb 2013].
24. Heritage J. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data. In: Silverman D, ed. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: Sage; 2004:222-45.
25. Heritage J. Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In: Fitch KL, Sanders RE, eds. Handbook of language and social interaction. Marwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:103-47.
26. Jefferson G. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner GH, ed. Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 2004:ix-xvi.
27. Hakaana M. Laughter in medical interaction: from quantification to analysis, and back. J Socioling 2002;6:207-35.
28. Schegloff EA. Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: University Press; 2007.
29. Schegloff EA, Lerner GH. Beginning to respond: well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Res Lang Soc Interac 2009;42:91-115.
30. Goodwin C, Heritage J. Conversation analysis. Ann Rev Anthropol 1990;19:283-307.
31. Heritage J, Raymond G. The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Soc Psychol Quart 2005;68:15-38.
32. Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In: Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J, eds. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: University Press; 2011:3-24.
33. Enfield NJ. Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In: Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J, eds. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: University Press; 2011:285-312.
34. Hayano K. Claiming epistemic primacy: yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In: Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J, eds. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: University Press; 2011:58-81.
35. Heinemann T, Lindström A, Steensig J. Addressing epistemic incongruence in question-Answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In: Stivers T, Mondada L, Steensig J, eds. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: University Press; 2011:107-30.
36. Peräkylä A. Agency and authority: extended responses to diagnostic statements in primary care encounters. Res Lang Soc Interac 2002; 35:219-47.
37. Pilnick A. "There are no rights and wrongs in these situations": identifying interactional difficulties in genetic counselling. Soc Health Ill 2002;24:66-88.
38. Heritage J, Sefi S. Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice between health visitors and first time mothers. In: Drew P, Heritage J, eds. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: University Press; 1992:359-417.
39. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making-The pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012;366:780-1.
40. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Preferences of patients for patient-centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ 2001;322:486-72.
41. Leach E, Cornwell P, Fleming J, Haines T. Patient centered goalsetting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32: 1419-27.
42. Ariss S. Asymmetrical knowledge claims in general practice consultations with frequent attending patients: limitations and opportunities for patient participation. Soc Sci Med 2009;69: 908-19.
43. Schoeb V. "What do you expect from physiotherapy?": a conversation analytic approach to goal setting in physiotherapy [dissertation]. UK: University of Nottingham (unpublished).
44. Collins S, Britten N, Ruusuvuori J, Thompson A. Patient participation in health care consultations: qualitative perspectives. McGraw Hill: Open University Press; 2007.
45. Schoeb V, Burge E. Perceptions of patients and physiotherapists on patient participation: a narrative synthesis of qualitative studies. Physiother Res Int 2012;17:80-91.
46. Peräkylä A, Vehvilaïnen S. Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse Soc 2003;14: 727-50.