Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment

Health Expectations

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 742-750

  Whitty, Jennifer A ^a,b   Spinks, Jean ^c   Bucknall, Tracey ^c,d,e   Tobiano, Georgia ^c   Chaboyer, Wendy ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e ALFRED HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

communication; discrete choice experiment; nursing; patient safety; preferences

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL HANDOVER; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; COMMUNICATION; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PATIENT HANDOFF; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE;

EID: 84996843142     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12513     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mardis M, Davis J, Benningfield B, et al. Shift-to-shift handoff effects on patient safety and outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Med Qual. 2015. ePub ahead of print, Oct 30. doi: 10.1177/1062860615612923.
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Chapter 5: Overall Results. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: 2014 User Comparative Database Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
3. World Health Organization. Action on Patient Safety—High 5s. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2016. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/solutions/high5s/en/. Accessed March 11, 2016.
4. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Safety and Quality Imporvement Guide Standard 6: Clinical Handover (October 2012). Sydney, Australia: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2012.
5. Tobiano G, Marshall A, Bucknall T, et al. Patient participation in nursing care on medical wards: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52:1107–1120.
6. Anderson J, Malone L, Shanahan K, et al. Nursing bedside clinical handover—an integrated review of issues and tools. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:662–671.
7. Mardis T, Mardis M, Davis J, et al. Bedside Shift-to-shift handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. J Nurs Care Qual. 2016;31:54–60.
8. Laws D, Amato S. Incorporating bedside reporting into change-of-shift report. Rehabil Nurs. 2010;35:70–74.
9. Chaboyer W, McMurray A, Wallis M. Bedside nursing handover: a case study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010;16:27–34.
10. McMurray A, Chaboyer W, Wallis M, et al. Patients' perspectives of bedside nursing handover. Collegian. 2011;18:19–26.
11. de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21:145–172.
12. Spinks J, Chaboyer W, Bucknall T, et al. Patient and nurse preferences for nurse handover-Using preferences to inform policy: a discrete choice experiment protocol. BMJ Open. 2015;5: e008941 open access article (p1–8). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008941.
13. Tobiano G, Bucknall T, Marshall A, et al. Patients' perceptions of participation in nursing care on medical wards. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015;30:260–270. doi: 10.1111/scs.12237.
14. Johnson FR, Lancsar E, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16:3–13.
15. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1974:105–142.
16. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
17. Bech M, Gyrd-Hansen D. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2005;14:1079–1083.
18. Whitty JA, Kendall E, Sav A, et al. Preferences for the delivery of community pharmacy services to help manage chronic conditions. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015;11:197–215.
19. Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health-a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14:403–413.
20. Scholl I, Zill JM, Harter M, et al. An integrative model of patient-centeredness—a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107828.
21. Chaboyer W, McMurray A, Marshall A, et al. Patient engagement in clinical communication: an exploratory study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30:565–573. doi:10.1111/scs.12279.
22. Weingart SN, Zhu J, Chiappetta L, et al. Hospitalized patients' participation and its impact on quality of care and patient safety. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:269–277.
23. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National safety and quality health service standards (September 2012). Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/NSQHS-Standards-Sept-2012.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2016.
24. Jorm CM, White S, Kaneen T. Clinical handover: critical communications. Med J Aust. 2009;190:108–109.
25. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Windows into Safety and Quality in Health Care 2010. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2010.
26. Australian Institite of Health and Welfare. Australia's Hospitals at a Glance 2009-10. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2011.
27. Lu S, Kerr D, McKinlay L. Bedside nursing handover: patients' opinions. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20:451–459.
28. Thórarinsdóttir K, Kristjánsson K. Patients' perspectives on person-centred participation in healthcare: a framework analysis. Nurs Ethics. 2014;21:129–147.
29. Eldh AC, Luhr K, Ehnfors M. The development and initial validation of a clinical tool for patients' preferences on patient participation—the 4Ps. Health Expect. 2015;18:2522–2535.
30. Bradley S, Mott S. Adopting a patient-centred approach: an investigation into the introduction of bedside handover to three rural hospitals. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23:1927–1936.
31. Jeffs L, Beswick S, Acott A, et al. Patients' views on bedside nursing handover: creating a space to connect. J Nurs Care Qual. 2014;29:149–154.
32. Kerr D, Lu S, McKinlay L. Towards patient-centred care: perspectives of nurses and midwives regarding shift-to-shift bedside handover. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20:250–257.
33. Johnson M, Cowin LS. Nurses discuss bedside handover and using written handover sheets. J Nurs Manag. 2013;21:121–129.
34. Tobiano G, Marshall A, Bucknall T, et al. Activities patients and nurses undertake to promote patient participation. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;49:362–370.
35. Angel S, Frederiksen KN. Challenges in achieving patient participation: a review of how patient participation is addressed in empirical studies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52:1525–1538.
36. Queensland Health. Queensland Bedside Audit 2014. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Health; 2015.
37. Tobiano G, Chaboyer W, McMurray A. Family members' perceptions of the nursing bedside handover. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22:192–200.
38. Chaboyer W, McMurray A, Johnson J, et al. Bedside handover: quality improvement strategy to “transform care at the bedside”. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009;24:136–142.
39. Daly A, Hess S, de Jong G. Calculating errors for measures derived from choice modelling estimates. Transp Res Part B. 2012;46:333–341.