Development of a dynamic computational model of social cognitive theory

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 483-495

  Riley, William T ^a   Martin, Cesar A ^b   Rivera, Daniel E ^b   Hekler, Eric B ^c   Adams, Marc A ^c   Buman, Matthew P ^c   Pavel, Misha ^d   King, Abby C ^e  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational modeling; Control systems engineering; Dynamical system modeling; Health behavior theory; Social cognitive theory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BEHAVIOR THEORY; CONTROL SYSTEM; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTENTION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL THEORY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 84995780915     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-015-0356-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31: 399-418.
2. Cole K, Waldrop J, D'Auria J, et al. An integrative research review: effective school-based childhood overweight interventions. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing. 2006; 11: 166-177.
3. Lopez LM, Tolley EE, Grimes DA, et al. Theory-based interventions for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; CD007249.
4. Villanti AC, McKay HS, Abrams DB, et al. Smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39: 564-574.
5. Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams M, et al. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: 336-345.
6. Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, et al. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2011; 1: 53-71.
7. Bandura AA, Walters RH. Social Learning and Personality Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1963.
8. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84: 191-215.
9. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.
10. Anderson-Bill ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Social cognitive determinants of nutrition and physical activity among web-health users enrolling in an online intervention: the influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-regulation. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011; 13, e28.
11. Lubans DR, Plotnikoff RC, Morgan PJ, et al. Explaining dietary intake in adolescent girls from disadvantaged secondary schools. A test of Social Cognitive Theory. Appetite. 2012; 58: 517-524.
12. Safren SA, Traeger L, Skeer M, et al. Testing a social-cognitive model of HIV transmission risk behaviors in HIV-infected MSM with and without depression. Health Psychol. 2010; 29: 215-221.
13. Rimal RN. Longitudinal influences of knowledge and self-efficacy on exercise behavior: tests of a mutual reinforcement model. J Health Psychol. 2001; 6: 31-46.
14. Dishman RK, Dunn AL, Sallis JF, et al. Social-cognitive correlates of physical activity in a multi-ethnic cohort of middle-school girls: two year prospective study. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010; 35: 188-198.
15. Deboeck PR, Bergeman CS. The reservoir model: a differential equation model of psychological regulation. Psychol Methods. 2013; 18: 237-256.
16. Navarro-Barrientos JE, Rivera DE, Collins LM. A dynamical model for describing behavioural interventions for weight loss and body composition change. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst. 2011; 17: 183-203.
17. Rivera DE, Pew MD, Collins LM. Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: a conceptual introduction. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 88: S31-S40.
18. Riley WT, Serrano KJ, Nilsen W, et al. Mobile and wireless technologies in health behavior and the potential for intensively adaptive interventions. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2015; 5: 67-71.
19. Hanneman RA. Computer-Assisted Theory Building: Modeling Dynamic Social Systems. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1988.
20. Powers WT. Feedback: beyond behaviorism. Science. 1973; 179: 351-356.
21. Wiener N. Cybernetics: On Communication and Control in Animals and Machines. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1948.
22. Carver CS, Scheier MF. On the Self-regulation of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
23. Bandura A. The self system in reciprocal determinism. Am Psychol. 1978; 33: 344-358.
24. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008; 4: 1-32.
25. Chan M, Esteve D, Fournois J-Y, et al. Smart wearable systems: current status and future challenges. Psychol Health. 2012; 27: 1009-1020.
26. Orr MG, Thrush R, Plaut DC. The Theory of Reasoned Action as parallel constraint satisfaction: towards a dynamic computational model of health behavior. PLoS One. 2013; 8, e62490.
27. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 179-211.
28. Bandura A. The evolution of social cognitive theory. In: Smith G, Hitt MA, eds. Great Minds in Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005: 9-35.
29. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior. 2004; 31: 143-164.
30. Williams DM, Anderson ES, Winett RA. A review of the outcome expectancy construct in physical activity research. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 29: 70-79.
31. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Oxford: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
32. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. In: Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins TE, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol 1). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2012: 349-373.
33. Forrester J. Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technol Rev. 1971; 73: 52-68.
34. Savage JS, Downs DS, Dong Y, et al. Control systems engineering for optimizing a prenatal weight gain intervention to regulate infant birth weight. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: 1247-1254.
35. Ayotte BJ, Margrett JA, Hicks-Patrick J. Physical activity in middle-aged and young-old adults: the roles of self-efficacy, barriers, outcome expectancies, self-regulatory behaviors and social support. J Health Psychol. 2010; 15: 173-185.
36. Hekler EB, Buman MP, Ahn D, et al. Are daily fluctuations in perceived environment associated with walking? Psychol Health. 2012; 27: 1009-1020.
37. Gariépy JF, Watson KK, Du E, et al. Social learning in humans and other animals. Front Neurosci. 2014; 8: 58.
38. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 248-287.
39. Bandura A. Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In: Hamilton V, Bower GH, Frijda NH, eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Emotion and Motivation. NATO ASI series D: Behavioural and social sciences, vol. 44. New York: Kluwer; 1988: 37-61.
40. Kirsch I, Lynn SJ, Vigorito M, et al. The role of cognition in classical and operant conditioning. J Clin Psychol. 2004; 60: 369-392.
41. Hovell MF, Walgren DR, Adams MA. The logical and empirical basis for the behavioral ecological model. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. Strategies for Enhancing Public Health (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2009: 415-449.
42. Bandura A. The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2005; 54: 245-254.
43. Dickinson A, de Wit S. The interaction between discriminative stimuli and outcomes during instrumental learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 2003; 56B: 127-139.
44. Dunton GF, Atienza AA. The need for time-intensive information in healthful eating and physical activity research: a timely topic. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109: 30-35.
45. Romppel M, Hermann-Lingen C, Wachter R, et al. A short form of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE-6): development, psychometric properties and validity in an intercultural non-clinical sample and a sample of patients at risk for heart failure. Psychosoc Med. 2013; 10, Doc01.
46. Spruijt-Metz D, Hekler E, Saranummi N, et al. Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavior research. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2015; 5: 335-346.
47. Sheynin J, Moustafa AA, Beck KD, et al. Testing the role of reward and punishment sensitivity in avoidance behavior: a computational modeling approach. Behavior and Brain Research. 2015; 283: 121-138.