The reservoir model: A differential equation model of psychological regulation

Psychological Methods

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 237-256

  Deboeck, Pascal R ^a   Bergeman, C S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Daily diary; Differential equation; Intraindividual observations; Negative affect; Resiliency

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AFFECT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COPING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MENTAL STRESS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TIME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AFFECT; AGED; AGING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESILIENCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84879510348     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0031603     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bisconti, T. L., Bergeman, C. S., & Boker, S. M. (2006). Social support as a predictor of variability: An examination of the adjustment trajectories of recent widows. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 590-599. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.590
2. Boker, S. M., & Graham, J. (1998). A dynamical systems analysis of adolescent substance abuse. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(4), 479-507. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3304_3
3. Boker, S. M., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2005). Dynamical systems modeling: An application to the regulation of intimacy and disclosure in marriage. In T. A. Walls & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 195-218). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Boker, S. M., Leibenluft, E., Deboeck, P. R., Virk, G., & Postolache, T. T. (2008). Mood oscillations and coupling between mood and weather in patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, 1(2), 181-203.
5. Boker, S., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T., . . . Fox, J. (2011). OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 306-317. doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6
6. Boker, S. M., Neale, M. C., & Rausch, J. R. (2004). Latent differential equation modeling with multivariate multi-occasion indicators. In K. V. Montfort, J. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models: Theory and applications (pp. 151-174). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
7. Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(1), 127-160. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3701_06
8. Chow, S.-M., Ho, M. R., Hamaker, E. J., & Dolan, C. V. (2010). Equivalences and differences between structural equation and state-space modeling frameworks. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(2), 303-332. doi:10.1080/10705511003661553
9. Chow, S.-M., Ram, N., Boker, S. M., Fujita, F., & Clore, G. (2005). Emotion as a thermostat: Representing emotion regulation using a damped oscillator model. Emotion, 5(2), 208-225. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.208
10. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385- 396. doi:10.2307/2136404
11. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1991). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. Deboeck, P. R. (2010). Estimating dynamical systems: Derivative estimation hints from Sir Ronald A. Fisher. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 725-745. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.498294
13. Deboeck, P. R., Montpetit, M. A., Bergeman, C. S., & Boker, S. M. (2009). Describing intraindividual variability at multiple time scales using derivative estimates. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 367-386. doi:10.1037/a0016622
14. Delsing, M. J. M. H., & Oud, J. H. L. (2008). Analyzing reciprocal relationships by means of the continuous-time autoregressive latent trajectory model. Statistica Neerlandica, 62(1), 58-82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.2007.00386.x
15. Dolan, C. V., & van der Maas, H. (1998). Fitting multivariage normal finite mixtures subject to structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 63(3), 227-253. doi:10.1007/BF02294853
16. Durbin, J., & Koopman, S. J. (2001). Time series analysis by state space methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Flachaire, E. (2005). Bootstrapping heteroskedastic regression models: Wild bootstrap vs. pairs bootstrap. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49(2), 361-376. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.05.018
18. Heinen, T. (1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2006a). Information-theoretic latent distribution modeling: Distinguishing discrete and continuous latent variable models. Psychological Methods, 11(3), 228-243. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.228
20. Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2006b). Latent variable modeling: Representing the structural continuity and discontinuity of normal and abnormal personality. In S. Strack (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (2nd ed., pp. 239-256). New York, NY: Springer.
21. Molenaar, P. C. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201-218. doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
22. Montpetit, M. A., Bergeman, C. S., Deboeck, P. R., Tiberio, S. S., & Boker, S. M. (2010). Resilience-as-process: Negative affect, stress, and coupled dynamical systems. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 631-640. doi:10.1037/a0019268
23. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). Interindividual differences in intraindividual change. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 92-105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10099-006
24. Oud, J. H. L. (2007). Continuous time modeling of reciprocal relationships in the cross-lagged panel design. In S. M. Boker & M. J. Wenger (Eds.), Data analytic techniques for dynamical systems (pp. 87-129). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika, 65(2), 199- 215. doi:10.1007/BF02294374
26. Ozaki, T., & Iino, M. (2001). An innovation approach to non-Gaussian time series analysis. Journal of Applied Probability, 38A, 78-92. doi: 10.1239/jap/1085496593
27. R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.r-project.org
28. Tipler, P. A., & Llewellyn, R. (1999). Modern physics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Freeman.
29. Tipler, P. A., & Mosca, G. (2007). Physics for scientists and engineers (6th ed.). New York, NY: Freeman.
30. von Oertzen, T., & Boker, S. M. (2010). Time delay embedding increases estimation precision of models of intraindividual variability. Psychometrika, 75(1), 158-175. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9137-9
31. Wallace, K. A., Bergeman, C. S., & Maxwell, S. E. (2002). An application of classification and regression tree (CART) analyses: Predicting outcomes in later life. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 17, pp. 71-92). New York, NY: Nova Science.
32. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
33. Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2008). Comparisons of four methods for estimating a dynamic factor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(3), 377-402. doi:10.1080/10705510802154281