Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 335-346

  Spruijt Metz, Donna ^a   Hekler, Eric ^b   Saranummi, Niilo ^c   Intille, Stephen ^d   Korhonen, Ilkka ^e   Nilsen, Wendy ^f   Rivera, Daniel E ^b   Spring, Bonnie ^g   Michie, Susan ^h   Asch, David A ⁱ   Sanna, Alberto ^j   Salcedo, Vicente Traver ^k   Kukakfa, Rita ^l   Pavel, Misha ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^d NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^g NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^j SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^k UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^l Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Computational models of behavior; Connected health; Health related behavior; Just in time adaptive interventions; mHealth; Mobile health; Real time interventions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; DATA BASE; DATA MINING; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOBILE PHONE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR;

EID: 84939204163     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-015-0324-1     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Schroeder SA. Shattuck lecture. We can do better—improving the health of the American people. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007; 357(12): 1221-1228.
2. Mokdad AH et al. Correction: actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2005; 293(3): 293-298.
3. Mokdad AH et al. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004; 291(10): 1238-1245.
4. Keeney RL. Personal decisions are the leading cause of death, in Operations Research. 2008. p. 1335 +.
5. Waters E et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub3.
6. Shaw KA et al. Exercise for overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003817.pub3.
7. Stead Lindsay F, Lancaster T. Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001007.pub2.
8. Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, HavilandML. Confirming “Truth”: more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Journal Information. 2004; 94(2).
9. Grimshaw G, Stanton A. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003289.pub4.
10. Stamatakis KA et al. Where is obesity prevention on the map?: Distribution and predictors of local health department prevention activities in relation to county-level obesity prevalence in the United States. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2012; 18(5): 402-411.
11. Spruijt-Metz D. Etiology, treatment, and prevention of obesity in childhood and adolescence: a decade in review. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2011; 21(1): 129-152.
12. Spring B et al. Healthy apps: mobile devices for continuous monitoring and intervention. IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4(6): 34-40.
13. Nilsen WJ, Pavel M. Moving behavioral theories into the 21st century. IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4(5): 25-28.
14. Riley WT et al. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2011; 1(1): 53-71.
15. Rimer B, Glanz K. Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, Editor; 2005: 1-64.
16. Wood A et al. Context-aware wireless sensor networks for assisted living and residential monitoring. IEEE Network. 2008; 22(4): 26-33.
17. Dickerson R, Gorlin E, Stankovic J. Empath: continuous emotional health monitoring system for major depression, in Wireless Health 2011. 2011: San Diego.
18. Annavaram M. et al. Multimodal sensing for pediatric obesity applications. in UrbanSense08. 2008. Raleigh.
19. Li M et al. Multimodal physical activity recognition by fusing temporal and cepstral information. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2010; 18(4): 369-380.
20. Dunton GF et al. Investigating children’s physical activity and sedentary behavior using ecological momentary assessment with mobile phones. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011; 19(6): 1205-1212.
21. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008; 4: 1-32.
22. Dockray S et al. A comparison of affect ratings obtained with ecological momentary assessment and the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research. 2010; 99(2): 269-283.
23. Rivera DE, Jimison HB. Systems modeling of behavior change: two illustrations from optimized interventions for improved health outcomes. IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4(6): 41-47.
24. Saranummi N et al. Moving the science of behavioral change into the 21st century. IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4(5): 23-24.
25. Rodgers JL. The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: a quiet methodological revolution. American Psychologist. 2010; 65(1): 1.
26. Millikan RG. What is behavior? in the society for the philosophy of psychology, annual meeting, Toronto. 1987.
27. Lorenz, K., What is behavior? Species of mind: the philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. 1999: p. 39.
28. Tawney G. What is behavior? The Journal of Philosophy Psychology and Scientific Methods. 1915; 12(2): 29-32.
29. Kattsoff L. What is behavior? Philosophy and phenomenological research. 1948; p. 98–102.
30. Tuomisto MT, Parkkinen L. Defining behavior and environment interactions: translating and developing an experimental and applied behavior-analytic vocabulary in and to the national language. 2012; 97(3): p. 347–55.
31. Glass TA, McAtee MJ. Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: extending horizons, envisioning the future. Social Science and Medicine. 2006; 62(7): 1650-1671.
32. Estrin D, Sim I. Open mHealth architecture: an engine for health care innovation. Science. 2010; 330(6005): 759.
33. Ramanathan, N., et al. Ohmage: an open mobile system for activity and experience sampling. 2012. IEEE.
34. Jaimes LG, Llofriu M, Raij A. A stress-free life: just-in-time interventions for stress via real-time forecasting and intervention adaptation. in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Body Area Networks. 2014. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering).
35. Duncan M, Badland H, Mummery W. Applying GPS to enhance understanding of transport-related physical activity. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2009; 12(5): 549-556.
36. Dunton GF. et al. Locations of joint physical activity in parent-child pairs based on accelerometer and gps monitoring. Ann Behav Med. 2012.
37. Berke EM et al. Objective measurement of sociability and activity: mobile sensing in the community. Annals of Family Medicine. 2011; 9(4): 344-350.
38. Fergus P et al. Monitoring and measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management. 2012; 13(5): 283-303.
39. Vathsangam H, Sukhatme G.S. Using phone-based activity monitors to promote physical activity in older adults: a pilot study. in Healthcare Innovation Conference (HIC), 2014 IEEE. 2014. IEEE.
40. Nahum-Shani I, Hekler E, Spruijt-Metz D. Building health behavior models to guide the development of just-in-time adaptive interventions: a pragmatic framework. Under Review.
41. Jimison H. et al. Models of cognitive performance based on home monitoring data. Proc. of EMBS’10, 2010.
42. Kumar S et al. Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013; 45(2): 228-236.
43. Pavel M et al. The role of technology and engineering models in transforming healthcare. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2013; 6: 156-177.
44. Hekler EB et al. Exploring behavioral markers of long-term physical activity maintenance: a case study of system identification modeling within a behavioral intervention. Health Education & Behavior. 2013; 40(1 suppl): 51S-62S.
45. Riley WT. et al. The development of a control systems model of social cognitive theory. Under review.
46. Lich KH. et al. A call to address complexity in prevention science research. Prev Sci, 2012: p. 1–11.
47. Rivera DE, Pew MD, Collins LM. Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: a conceptual introduction. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2007; 88(Suppl 2): S31-S40.
48. Timms KP. et al. Control systems engineering for understanding and optimizing smoking cessation interventions. in American Control Conference (ACC), 2013. 2013. IEEE.
49. Deshpande S. et al. A control engineering approach for designing an optimized treatment plan for fibromyalgia. in American Control Conference (ACC), 2011. 2011. IEEE.
50. Martın CA. et al. A dynamical systems model of social cognitive theory. in Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC’14). 2014.
51. Hammond RA. Complex systems modeling for obesity research. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2009; 6(3): A97.
52. Hammond RA, Dube L, A systems science perspective and transdisciplinary models for food and nutrition security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. in press.
53. Hammond RA, A complex systems approach to understanding and combating the obesity epidemic. 2008: Center on Social and Economic Dynamics.
54. Hammond RA. et al. A model of food reward learning with dynamic reward exposure. Frontiers in computational neuroscience. 2012. 6.
55. Chih M-Y et al. Predictive modeling of addiction lapses in a mobile health application. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2014; 46(1): 29-35.
56. Dutech A, Scherrer B. Partially observable Markov decision processes. Markov Decision Processes in Artificial Intelligence. 2013; p. 185–228
57. Li L. et al. A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. in Proceedings of The 19th International Conference On World Wide Web. 2010. ACM.
58. Bouneffouf D, Bouzeghoub A, Gançarski AL. Exploration/exploitation trade-off in mobile context-aware recommender systems, in AI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. 2012; Springer. p. 591–601.
59. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. 2011; 1: 349.
60. Martin CA. et al. A dynamical systems model of social cognitive theory. in American Control Conference (ACC), 2014. 2014. IEEE.
61. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. 2000, Norman Paul, Abraham Charles, Conner Mark (Eds). Understanding and changing health behaviour: from health beliefs to self-regulation. (2000).
62. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.
63. Bandura A. Self-efficacy—the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
64. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Key Readings in Social Psychology. Baumeister Roy F (Ed). 1999.
65. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001; 52: 1-26.
66. Martin CA. et al. A dynamical systems model of social cognitive theory. Manuscript Submitted for Publication, 2013.
67. Riley WT. et al. The development of a control systems model of social cognitive theory. Manuscript Submitted for Publication 2013.
68. Philips, L.A., E.B. Hekler, and J. Abrams, Beyond context stability: motivational and self-identity mechanisms of exercise Habi. Under review.
69. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist. 2002; 57(9): 705.
70. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
71. Adams MA et al. An adaptive physical activity intervention for overweight adults: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12): e82901.
72. Vogel AL. et al. Pioneering the transdisciplinary team science approach: lessons learned from national cancer institute grantees. Journal of Translational Medicine Epidemiology. 2014; 2(2).
73. Hall KD, Hammond RA, Rahmandad H. Dynamic interplay among homeostatic, hedonic, and cognitive feedback circuits regulating body weight. American Journal of Public Health. 2014; 104(7): 1169-1175.
74. Pirolli P. Seeking answers, making sense, changing lifestyles: cognitive models of human-information interaction, in Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium. 2014, ACM: Regensburg, Germany. p. 2–3.
75. Hekler EB. et al. Mind the theoretical gap: interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2013. ACM.
76. Rahman MM. et al. Are we there yet?: Feasibility of continuous stress assessment via wireless physiological sensors. in Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics. 2014. ACM.
77. PhenX. PhenX. Consensus measures for phenotypes and exposures. 2013 [cited 2013; The PhenX Toolkit offers a web-based catalog of curated measures for consideration and inclusion in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and other large-scale genomic research efforts]. Available from: https://www.phenx.org.
78. Neuroscience Toolbox for cognitive functioning. 2013; Available from: http://www.neuroscienceblueprint.nih.gov/factSheet/toolbox.htm.
79. PROMIS. PROMIS: Dynamic tools to measure health outcomes from a patient perspective. 2013 [cited 2013; A system of highly reliable, precise measures of patient–reported health status for physical, mental, and social well–being.]. Available from: http://www.nihpromis.org.
80. Michie S. et al. ABC of Behaviour change theories. 2014
81. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011; 6: 42.
82. Michie S et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2013; 46(1): 81-95.
83. National Institutes of Health. BD2K. 2014; Available from: http://bd2k.nih.gov/-sthash.I1KoZCl6.dpuf
84. Hovell M, Wahlgren D, Adams M. The logical and empirical basis for the behavioral ecological model. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. 2009; 2: 347-385.
85. Haisley E et al. The impact of alternative incentive schemes on completion of health risk assessments. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2012; 26(3): 184-188.
86. VPH-SHARE. VPH (Virtual Physiological Human)-Share Project. 2012 [cited 2012; Available from: http://www.vph-share.eu.
87. Lenert L et al. A framework for modeling health behavior protocols and their linkage to behavioral theory. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2005; 38(4): 270-280.
88. Bickmore TW, Schulman D, Sidner CL. A reusable framework for health counseling dialogue systems based on a behavioral medicine ontology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2011; 44(2): 183-197.
89. Wikpedia. Big Data. 2013; Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_data