Using implementation science to examine the impact of cancer survivorship care plans

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 34, Issue 32, 2016, Pages 3834-3837

  Selove, Rebecca ^a   Birken, Sarah A ^b   Skolarus, Ted A ^c   Hahn, Erin E ^d   Sales, Anne ^c   Proctor, Enola K ^e  

^a TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURVIVOR; CANCER THERAPY; CLINICAL OUTCOME; DEPRESSION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTIONALITY; EMPLOYMENT; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NOTE; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COPING BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; NEOPLASM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; CANCER SURVIVORS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84995483239     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.8060     Document Type: Note

References (56)

1. Institute of Medicine; National Research Council: From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor-Lost in Transition: An American Society of Clinical Oncology and Institute of Medicine Symposium. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2006
2. Hewitt ME, Bamundo A, Day R, et al: Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: Qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. J Clin Oncol 25: 2270-2273, 2007
3. American College of Surgeons: Cancer program standards 2012: Ensuring patient-centered care. https://www.facs.org/quality%20programs/cancer/coc/standards
4. American Cancer Society: National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center systems policy and practice: Clinical survivorship care overview. Washington, DC, The George Washington Cancer Institute, 2011
5. Mayer DK, Shapiro CL, Jacobson P, et al: Assuring quality cancer survivorship care: We've only just begun. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book e583-e591, 2015
6. Ganz PA, Casillas J, Hahn EE: Ensuring quality care for cancer survivors: Implementing the survivorship care plan. Semin Oncol Nurs 24: 208-217, 2008
7. Cowens-Alvarado R, Sharpe K, Pratt-Chapman M, et al: Advancing survivorship care through the National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center: Developing American Cancer Society guidelines for primary care providers. CA Cancer J Clin 63: 147-150, 2013
8. Faul LA, Rivers B, Shibata D, et al: Survivorship care planning in colorectal cancer: Feedback from survivors & providers. J Psychosoc Oncol 30: 198-216, 2012
9. Brennan ME, Gormally JF, Butow P, et al: Survivorship care plans in cancer: A systematic review of care plan outcomes. Br J Cancer 111: 1899-1908, 2014
10. Klemanski DL, Browning KK, Kue J: Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: A systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv 10: 71-86, 2016
11. Boekhout AH, Maunsell E, Pond GR, et al: A survivorship care plan for breast cancer survivors: Extended results of a randomized clinical trial. J Cancer Surviv 9: 683-691, 2015
12. Nicolaije KAH, Ezendam NPM, Vos MC, et al: Impact of an automatically generated cancer survivorship care plan on patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice: Longitudinal outcomes of a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 33: 3550-3559, 2015
13. Birken SA, Presseau J, Ellis SD, et al: Potential determinants of health-care professionals' use of survivorship care plans: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci 9: 167, 2014
14. Birken SA, Deal AM, Mayer DK, et al: Following through: The consistency of survivorship care plan use in United States cancer programs. J Cancer Educ 29: 689-697, 2014
15. Blanch-Hartigan D, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, et al: Provision and discussion of survivorship care plans among cancer survivors: Results of a nationally representative survey of oncologists and primary care physicians. J Clin Oncol 32: 1578-1585, 2014
16. Forsythe LP, Parry C, Alfano CM, et al: Use of survivorship care plans in the United States: Associations with survivorship care. J Natl Cancer Inst 105: 1579-1587, 2013
17. Oancea SC, Cheruvu VK: Psychological distress among adult cancer survivors: Importance of survivorship care plan. Support Care Cancer. 10.1007/s00520-016-3291-2 [epub online ahead of print June 4, 2016
18. Parry C, Kent EE, Forsythe LP, et al: Can't see the forest for the care plan: A call to revisit the context of care planning. J Clin Oncol 31: 2651-2653, 2013
19. Alfano CM, Smith T, de Moor JS, et al: An action plan for translating cancer survivorship research into care. J Natl Cancer Inst 106: Dju287, 2014
20. Salz T, Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS, et al: Survivorship care plans in research and practice. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 101-117, 2012
21. Brothers BM, Easley A, Salani R, et al: Do survivorship care plans impact patients' evaluations of care? A randomized evaluation with gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecol Oncol 129: 554-558, 2013
22. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK (eds): Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2012
23. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 4: 50, 2009
24. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, et al: Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med 43: 337-350, 2012
25. Powell BJ, Proctor EK, Glass JE: A systematic review of strategies for implementing empirically supported mental health interventions. Res Soc Work Pract 24: 192-212, 2014
26. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, et al: A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci 10: 21, 2015
27. Rabin B, Glasgow RE: An implementation science perspective on psychological science and cancer: What is known and opportunities for research, policy, and practice. Am Psychol 70: 211-220, 2015
28. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, et al: Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care 50: 217-226, 2012
29. Phillips SM, Alfano CM, Perna FM, et al: Accelerating translation of physical activity and cancer survivorship research into practice: Recommendations for a more integrated and collaborative approach. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23: 687-699, 2014
30. Yu X, Klesges LM, Smeltzer MP, et al: Measuring improvement in populations: Implementing and evaluating successful change in lung cancer care. Transl Lung Cancer Res 4: 373-384, 2015
31. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al: Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 38: 65-76, 2011
32. Egan M, Bambra C, Petticrew M, et al: Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: Appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 63: 4-11, 2009
33. Mayer DK, Birken SA, Chen RC: Avoiding implementation errors in cancer survivorship care plan effectiveness studies. J Clin Oncol 33: 3528-3530, 2015
34. Landsverk J, Brown C, Chamberlain P, et al: Design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research, in Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK (eds): Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp 225-260
35. Highfield L, Hartman MA, Bartholomew LK, et al: Evaluation of the effectiveness and implementation of an adapted evidence-based mammography intervention for African American women. Biomed Res Int 2015: 240240, 2015
36. Rogers E, Fernandez S, Gillespie C, et al: Telephone care coordination for smokers in VA mental health clinics: Protocol for a hybrid type-2 effectivenessimplementation trial. Addict Sci Clin Pract 8: 7, 2013
37. Ritchie MJ, Kirchner JE, Parker LE, et al: Evaluation of an implementation facilitation strategy for settings that experience significant implementation barriers. Implement Sci 10: A46,2015 (suppl 1)
38. May C, Finch T,Mair F, et al: Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: The normalization process model. BMC Health Serv Res 7: 148, 2007
39. Ovretveit J: Understanding the conditions for improvement: Research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ Qual Saf 20: I18-i23, 2011(suppl 1)
40. Spain PD, Oeffinger KC, Candela J, et al: Response to a treatment summary and care plan among adult survivors of pediatric and young adult cancer. J Oncol Pract 8: 196-202, 2012
41. Brennan ME, Butow P, Spillane AJ, et al: Patient-reported quality of life, unmet needs and care coordination outcomes: Moving toward targeted breast cancer survivorship care planning. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 12: E323-e331, 2016
42. Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS: Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 24: 5117-5124, 2006
43. Smith SL, Singh-Carlson S, Downie L, et al: Survivors of breast cancer: Patient perspectives on survivorship care planning. J Cancer Surviv 5: 337-344, 2011
44. Mayer DK, Birken SA, Check DK, et al: Summing it up: An integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006-2013). Cancer 121: 978-996, 2015
45. Burg MA, Lopez EDS, Dailey A, et al: The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med 24: S467-S471, 2009 (suppl 1)
46. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB, et al: Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 27: 2489-2495, 2009
47. Haq R, Heus L, Baker N, et al: Designing a multi-faceted survivorship care plan to meet the information and communication needs of breast cancer patients and primary medical doctors. Med Inform Decis Mak 13: 76, 2013
48. Keesing S, McNamara B, Rosenwax L: Cancer survivors' experiences of using survivorship care plans: A systematic review of qualitative studies. J Cancer Surviv 9: 260-268, 2015
49. Mayer DK: How do we encourage patient engagement? Clin J Oncol Nurs 18: 487-488, 2014
50. Proctor EK, Rosen A: From knowledge production to implementation: Research challenges and imperatives. Res Soc Work Pract 18: 285-291, 2008
51. Simpson KM, Porter K, McConnell ES, et al: Tool for evaluating research implementation challenges: A sense-making protocol for addressing implementation challenges in complex research settings. Implement Sci 8: 2, 2013
52. Gugiu PC, Gugiu MR: A critical appraisal of standard guidelines for grading levels of evidence. Eval Health Prof 33: 233-255, 2010
53. Gugiu PC: Hierarchy of evidence and appraisal of limitations (HEAL) grading system. Eval Program Plann 48: 149-159, 2015
54. Glasgow RE: What types of evidence are most needed to advance behavioral medicine? Ann Behav Med 35: 19-25, 2008
55. Green LW: Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract 25: I20-i24, 2008 (suppl 1)
56. Green L: If we wantmore evidence-based practice, we need more practicebased evidence. Presented at CDC Oral Health Workshop, Atlanta, GA, October 24, 2007