Errors in causal inference: an organizational schema for systematic error and random error

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 788-793.e1

  Suzuki, Etsuji ^a   Tsuda, Toshihide ^b   Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu ^c   Mansournia, Mohammad Ali ^d   Yamamoto, Eiji ^e  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^e OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bias; Causality; Epidemiologic methods

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CAUSALITY; EXPOSURE VARIABLE; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOM ERROR; SAMPLING; SELECTION BIAS; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MEDICAL ERROR;

CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 84994845864     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: 18732585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. [1] Greenland, S., Morgenstern, H., Confounding in health research. Annu Rev Public Health 22 (2001), 189–212.
2. [2] Porta, M.S., (eds.) A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 6th ed., 2014, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
3. [3] Greenberg, R.S., Daniels, S.R., Flanders, W.D., Eley, J.W., Boring, J.R. III, Medical Epidemiology. 4th ed., 2005, Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
4. [4] Jekel, J.F., Katz, D.F., Elmore, J.G., Wild, D.M.G., Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine. 3rd ed., 2007, Saunders/Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA.
5. [5] Everitt, B., Skrondal, A., The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. 4th ed., 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. [6] Upton, G., Cook, I., A Dictionary of Statistics. 2nd ed., 2008, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
7. [7] Hernán, M.A., Robins, J.M., Causal Inference. 2016, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL forthcoming.
8. [8] Newman, S.C., Biostatistical Methods in Epidemiology. 2001, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
9. [9] Szklo, M., Nieto, F.J., Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics. 3rd ed., 2012, Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, MA.
10. [10] Rothman, K.J., Greenland, S., Lash, T.L., Validity in epidemiologic studies. Rothman, K.J., Greenland, S., Lash, T.L., (eds.) Modern Epidemiology, 2008, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 128–147.
11. [11] Greenland, S., Robins, J.M., Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding. Int J Epidemiol 15:3 (1986), 413–419.
12. [12] Little, R.J., Rubin, D.B., Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 21 (2000), 121–145.
13. [13] Cole, S.R., Frangakis, C.E., The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption?. Epidemiology 20:1 (2009), 3–5.
14. [14] VanderWeele, T.J., Concerning the consistency assumption in causal inference. Epidemiology 20:6 (2009), 880–883.
15. [15] Tchetgen Tchetgen, E.J., VanderWeele, T.J., On causal inference in the presence of interference. Stat Methods Med Res 21:1 (2012), 55–75.
16. [16] Flanders, W.D., Klein, M., A general, multivariate definition of causal effects in epidemiology. Epidemiology 26:4 (2015), 481–489.
17. [17] Cole, S.R., Hudgens, M.G., Brookhart, M.A., Westreich, D., Risk. Am J Epidemiol 181:4 (2015), 246–250.
18. [18] Hernán, M.A., A definition of causal effect for epidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health 58:4 (2004), 265–271.
19. [19] Greenland, S., Rothman, K.J., Lash, T.L., Measures of effect and measures of association. Rothman, K.J., Greenland, S., Lash, T.L., (eds.) Modern Epidemiology, 2008, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 51–70.
20. [20] Steineck, G., Ahlbom, A., A definition of bias founded on the concept of the study base. Epidemiology 3:6 (1992), 477–482.
21. [21] Maclure, M., Schneeweiss, S., Causation of bias: the episcope. Epidemiology 12:1 (2001), 114–122.
22. [22] Weisberg, H.I., Bias and Causation: Models and Judgment for Valid Comparisons. 2010, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
23. [23] Gatto, N.M., Campbell, U.B., Schwartz, S., An organizational schema for epidemiologic causal effects. Epidemiology 25:1 (2014), 88–97.
24. [24] Schwartz, S., Campbell, U.B., Gatto, N.M., Gordon, K., Toward a clarification of the taxonomy of “bias” in epidemiology textbooks. Epidemiology 26:2 (2015), 216–222.
25. [25] Howe, C.J., Cain, L.E., Hogan, J.W., Are all biases missing data problems?. Curr Epidemiol Rep 2:3 (2015), 162–171.
26. [26] Miettinen, O.S., Cook, E.F., Confounding: essence and detection. Am J Epidemiol 114:4 (1981), 593–603.
27. [27] Greenland, S., Pearl, J., Robins, J.M., Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 10:1 (1999), 37–48.
28. [28] Robins, J.M., Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference. Epidemiology 12:3 (2001), 313–320.
29. [29] Hernán, M.A., Hernández-Díaz, S., Werler, M.M., Mitchell, A.A., Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 155:2 (2002), 176–184.
30. [30] Hernán, M.A., Hernández-Díaz, S., Robins, J.M., A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 15:5 (2004), 615–625.
31. [31] Hernán, M.A., Cole, S.R., Invited commentary: causal diagrams and measurement bias. Am J Epidemiol 170:8 (2009), 959–962.
32. [32] Shahar, E., Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias. J Eval Clin Pract 15:3 (2009), 436–440.
33. [33] Shahar, E., Shahar, D.J., On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials. J Eval Clin Pract 15:6 (2009), 1214–1216.
34. [34] VanderWeele, T.J., Hernán, M.A., Results on differential and dependent measurement error of the exposure and the outcome using signed directed acyclic graphs. Am J Epidemiol 175:12 (2012), 1303–1310.
35. [35] Hernán, M.A., Beyond exchangeability: the other conditions for causal inference in medical research. Stat Methods Med Res 21:1 (2012), 3–5.
36. [36] Greenland, S., Robins, J.M., Identifiability, exchangeability and confounding revisited. Epidemiol Perspect Innov, 6, 2009, 4.
37. [37] Flanders, W.D., Eldridge, R.C., Summary of relationships between exchangeability, biasing paths and bias. Eur J Epidemiol 30:10 (2015), 1089–1099.
38. [38] Suzuki, E., Mitsuhashi, T., Tsuda, T., Yamamoto, E., A counterfactual approach to bias and effect modification in terms of response types. BMC Med Res Methodol, 13, 2013, 101.
39. [39] Greenland, S., Robins, J.M., Pearl, J., Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Stat Sci 14:1 (1999), 29–46.
40. [40] VanderWeele, T.J., Confounding and effect modification: distribution and measure. Epidemiol Method 1:1 (2012), 55–82.
41. [41] Edwards, J.K., Cole, S.R., Westreich, D., All your data are always missing: incorporating bias due to measurement error into the potential outcomes framework. Int J Epidemiol 44:4 (2015), 1452–1459.
42. [42] Greenland, S., Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias. Epidemiology 14:3 (2003), 300–306.
43. [43] Cole, S.R., Chu, H., Greenland, S., Maximum likelihood, profile likelihood, and penalized likelihood: a primer. Am J Epidemiol 179:2 (2014), 252–260.
44. [44] Agresti, A., Categorical Data Analysis. 1990, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
45. [45] Greenland, S., Mansournia, M.A., Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions. Stat Med 34:23 (2015), 3133–3143.
46. [46] Greenland, S., Mansournia, M.A., Altman, D.G., Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight. BMJ, 352, 2016, i1981.
47. [47] Mansournia, M.A., Altman, D.G., Inverse probability weighting. BMJ, 352, 2016, i189.
48. [48] Mansournia, M.A., Danaei, G., Forouzanfar, M.H., Mahmoodi, M., Jamali, M., Mansournia, N., et al. Effect of physical activity on functional performance and knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis: analysis with marginal structural models. Epidemiology 23:4 (2012), 631–640.
49. [49] Suzuki E, Mitsuhashi T, Tsuda T, Yamamoto E. A typology of four notions of confounding in epidemiology. J Epidemiol: in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.je.2016.09.003.
50. [50] Greenland, S., Randomization, statistics, and causal inference. Epidemiology 1:6 (1990), 421–429.
51. [51] Greenland, S., Mansournia, M.A., Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness. Eur J Epidemiol 30:10 (2015), 1101–1110.
52. [52] Sackett, D.L., Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis 32:1-2 (1979), 51–63.
53. [53] Delgado-Rodríguez, M., Llorca, J., Bias. J Epidemiol Community Health 58:8 (2004), 635–641.
54. [54] Mansournia MA, Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC, Hernán MA. Biases in randomized trials: a conversation between trialists and epidemiologists. Epidemiology: in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000564.
55. [55] Kurth, T., Walker, A.M., Glynn, R.J., Chan, K.A., Gaziano, J.M., Berger, K., et al. Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. Am J Epidemiol 163:3 (2006), 262–270.
56. [56] Mansournia, M.A., Greenland, S., The relation of collapsibility and confounding to faithfulness and stability. Epidemiology 26:4 (2015), 466–472.
57. [57] Mansournia, M.A., Hernán, M.A., Greenland, S., Matched designs and causal diagrams. Int J Epidemiol 42:3 (2013), 860–869.
58. [58] Lash, T.L., Fox, M.P., Fink, A.K., Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data. 2009, Springer, New York, NY.
59. [1] Porta, M.S., (eds.) A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 6th ed., 2014, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
60. [2] VanderWeele, T.J., Confounding and effect modification: distribution and measure. Epidemiol Method 1:1 (2012), 55–82.
61. [3] Suzuki E, Mitsuhashi T, Tsuda T, Yamamoto E. A typology of four notions of confounding in epidemiology. J Epidemiol: in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.je.2016.09.003.
62. [4] Greenland, S., Mansournia, M.A., Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness. Eur J Epidemiol 30:10 (2015), 1101–1110.