Erratum: Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation between Trialists and Epidemiologists (Epidemiology (2017) 28:1 (54-59) DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000564);Biases in randomized trials

Epidemiology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 54-59

  Mansournia, Mohammad Ali ^a   Higgins, Julian P T ^b   Sterne, Jonathan A C ^b   Hernán, Miguel A ^c,d  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTRITION BIAS; CAUSAL MODELING; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COGNITIVE BIAS; DETECTION BIAS; EPIDEMIOLOGIST; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE BIAS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REPORTING BIAS; SELECTION BIAS; STATISTICAL BIAS; CAUSALITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT DROPOUT;

BIAS; CAUSALITY; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT DROPOUTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 84991453714     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000846     Document Type: Erratum

References (31)

1. Hernán MA, Robins JM. Causal Inference. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2017
2. Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S. Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research. Clin Trials. 2012; 9: 48-55
3. Heitjan DF. Ignorability and bias in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1999; 18: 2421-2434
4. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2008
5. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928
6. R othman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Validity in epidemiologic studies. In Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash T (eds). Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008: 128-147
7. Miettinen OS. Theoretical Epidemiology. New York, NY: Wiley; 1985
8. Pearl J. Causality. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2009
9. G reenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999; 10: 37-48
10. Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004; 15: 615-625
11. C ole SR, Hernán MA. Fallibility in estimating direct effects. Int J Epidemiol. 2002; 31: 163-165
12. Hernán MA, Cole SR. Invited commentary: causal diagrams and measurement bias. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170: 959-962; discussion 963
13. Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Werler MM, Mitchell AA. Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 155: 176-184
14. Mansournia MA, Hernán MA, Greenland S. Matched designs and causal diagrams. Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42: 860-869
15. Food and Drug Administration. International Conference on Harmonisation; Guidance on Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. Federal Register. 1998; 63: 49583-49598
16. T oh S, Hernán MA. Causal inference from longitudinal studies with baseline randomization. Int J Biostat. 2008; 4: Article 22
17. Hernán MA, Robins JM. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream? Epidemiology. 2006; 17: 360-372
18. Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM. Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Wiley; 2002
19. Matthews JNS. An Introduction to Randomised Controlled Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006
20. G reenland S, Mansournia MA. Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015; 30: 1101-1110
21. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010
22. C how SC, Liu JP. Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2004
23. G reenland S, O'Rourke K. Meta-analysis. In Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash T (eds). Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008: 652-682
24. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. New York, NY: Springer; 2008
25. Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52: 935-942
26. Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 138: 923-936
27. G reenland S, Rothman KJ. Fundamentals of epidemiologic data analysis. In Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash T (eds). Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008: 213-237
28. I oannidis JPA. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology. 2008; 1: 640-648
29. Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Robins JM. Randomized trials analyzed as observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 159: 560-562
30. Shrier I. Structural approach to bias in meta-analyses. Res Synth Methods. 2011; 2: 223-237
31. Mansournia MA, Altman DG. Inverse probability weighting. BMJ. 2016; 352: i189