Measures for interoperability of phenotypic data: Minimum information requirements and formatting

Plant Methods

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Ćwiek Kupczyńska, Hanna ^a   Altmann, Thomas ^b   Arend, Daniel ^b   Arnaud, Elizabeth ^c   Chen, Dijun ^d   Cornut, Guillaume ^e   Fiorani, Fabio ^f   Frohmberg, Wojciech ^a,g   Junker, Astrid ^b   Klukas, Christian ^h   Lange, Matthias ^b   Mazurek, Cezary ⁱ   Nafissi, Anahita ^f   Neveu, Pascal ^j   Oeveren, Jan ^k   Pommier, Cyril ^e   Poorter, Hendrik ^f   Rocca Serra, Philippe ^l   Sansone, Susanna Assunta ^l   Scholz, Uwe ^b   Schriek, Marco ^k   Seren, Ümit ^m   Usadel, Björn ^f,n   Weise, Stephan ^b   Kersey, Paul ^o   Krajewski, Paweł ^a   more..

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS   (Poland)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

^c BIOVERSITY INTERNATIONAL   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^e Centre de recherche de Versailles   (France)

^f FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^g POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^h LemnaTec GmbH   (Germany)

ⁱ POZNAN SUPERCOMPUTING AND NETWORKING CENTER   (Poland)

^j UMR 729 MISTEA   (France)

^k KEYGENE N V   (Netherlands)

^l UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^m GREGOR MENDEL INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT BIOLOGY   (Austria)

ⁿ RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^o WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Data standardisation and formatting; Experiment description; Experimental metadata; Minimum information recommendations; Plant phenotyping

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994845357     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17464811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-016-0144-4     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Krajewski P, Chen D, Ćwiek H, et al. Towards recommendations for metadata and data handling in plant phenotyping. J Exp Bot. 2015;66:5417-27.
2. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot. 2013;61:167-234.
3. PrometheusWiki. http://prometheuswiki.publish.csiro.au. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
4. DROPS project. http://drops-project.eu. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
5. PODD repository. http://plantphenomics.org.au/projects/podd. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
6. Li YF, Kennedy G, Davies F, Hunter J. PODD: an ontology-driven data repository for collaborative phenomics research. The role of digital libraries in a time of global change. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 179-88.
7. Phenome network. https://www.phenome-fppn.fr/phenome_eng. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
8. MaizeGDB portal. http://www.maizegdb.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
9. Triticeae Toolbox portal. https://triticeaetoolbox.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
10. Phenopsis DB database. http://bioweb.supagro.inra.fr/phenopsis. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
11. GnpIS-Ephesis database. https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/ephesis. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
12. Yilmaz P, et al. The genomic standards consortium: bringing standards to life for microbial ecology. ISME J. 2011;5:1565-7.
13. Zimmerman P, et al. MIAME/Plant-adding value to plant microarrray experiments. Plant Methods. 2006;2:1.
14. Taylor CF, et al. The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE). Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:887-93.
15. Fiehn O, et al. The metabolomics standards initiative (MSI). Metabolomics. 2007;3:175-8.
16. Fiehn O, et al. Minimum reporting standards for plant biology context information in metabolomic studies. Metabolomics. 2007;3:195-201.
17. Morrison N, et al. Standard reporting requirements for biological samples in metabolomics experiments: environmental context. Metabolomics. 2007;3:203-10.
18. Rocca-Serra P, Salek RM, Arita M, et al. Data standards can boost metabolomics research, and if there is a will, there is a way. Metabolomics. 2016;12:14.
19. Rayner TF, Rocca-Serra P, Spellman PT, et al. A simple spreadsheet-based, MIAME-supportive format for microarray data: MAGE-TAB. BMC Bioinform. 2006;7:489.
20. ArrayExpress database. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
21. PRIDE database. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
22. Rocca-Serra P, Brandizi M, Maguire E, et al. ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2354-6.
23. ISA commons. http://isacommons.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
24. Trans-national Infrastructure for Plant Genomic Science. http://transplantdb.eu. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
25. European Plant Phenotyping Network. http://plant-phenotyping-network.eu. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
26. Poorter H, Fiorani F, Stitt M, et al. The art of growing plants for experimental purposes: a practical guide for the plant biologist. Funct Plant Biol. 2012;39:821-38.
27. Hannemann J, Poorter H, Usadel B, et al. Xeml Lab: a software suite for a standardised description of the growth environment of plants. Plant, Cell Environ. 2009;32:1185-200.
28. ISA-Tab software suite. http://www.isa-tools.org/software-suite. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
29. McNeill J, et al., editors. International code of botanical nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the seventeenth International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. 2006. http://web.archive.org/web/20121006231936/,http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/main.htm. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
30. FAO/Bioversity Multi-Crop Passport Descriptors, http://www.bioversityinternational.org/e-library/publications/detail/faobioversity-multi-crop-passport-descriptors-v2-mcpd-v2. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
31. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental designs. New York: Wiley; 1957.
32. Crop Ontology Platform. http://www.cropontology.org. Accessed 30 March 2016.
33. Shrestha R, et al. Bridging the phenotypic and genetic data useful for integrated breeding through a data annotation using the CropOntology developed by the crop communities of practice. Front Physiol. 2012;3:326.
34. Planteome project. http://planteome.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
35. Crop Research Ontology. http://cropontology.org/ontology/CO_715/Crop%20Research. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
36. XEML Environment Ontology. http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/XEO. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
37. Statistics Ontology. http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/STATO. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
38. ISA-Tab format specification. http://www.isa-tools.org/format/specification. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
39. MIAPPE at BioSharing portal. https://www.biosharing.org/bsg-000543. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
40. ISA-Tab configurations. http://www.isa-tools.org/format/configurations. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
41. MetaboLights database. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/metabolights. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
42. BII database for phenotypic data. http://www.igr.poznan.pl/bb/bii. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
43. Steinbach D, Alaux M, Amselem J, et al. GnpIS: an information system to integrate genetic and genomic data from plants and fungi. Database. 2013;. doi: 10.1093/database/bat058.
44. An exemplary dataset stored at Ephesis database. https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/ephesis/ephesis/viewer.do#dataResults/trialSetIds=5,6,7. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
45. Oury FX, Heumez E, Rolland B, et al. A dataset: winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) phenotypic data from the multiannual, multilocal field trials of the INRA small grain cereals. Network. 2015;. doi: 10.15454/1.4489666216568333E12.
46. Arend D, Colmsee C, Knüpffer H, et al. Data management experiences and best practices from the perspective of a plant research institute. In: Galhardas H, Rahm E, editors. Data integration in life sciences. Lecture notes in bioinformatics. Springer 2014; 8574:41-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08590-6_4.
47. Laboratory Information Management System at IPK. http://www.ipk-gatersleben.de/en/databases. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
48. Arend D, Lange M, Chen J, et al. e!DAL-a framework to store, share and publish research data. BMC Bioinform. 2014;15:214.
49. Junker A. A dataset "Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems". 2014. doi: 10.5447/IPK/2014/4.
50. Junker A, Muraya MM, Weigelt-Fischer K, et al. Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems. Front Plant Sci. 2015;5:770.
51. Plant Genomics and Phenomics Data Repository. http://edal.ipk-gatersleben.de/repos/pgp. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
52. Arend D, Junker A, Scholz U, et al. PGP repository: a plant phenomics and genomics data publication infrastructure. Database. 2016;2016:1-11. doi: 10.1093/database/baw033.
53. Junker A. A dataset "Raw images files from quantitative monitoring of 484 Arabidopsis thaliana plants using high-throughput plant phenotyping". 2016. doi: 10.5447/IPK/2016/7.
54. Arend D, et al. Quantitative monitoring of Arabidopsis thaliana growth and development using high-throughput plant phenotyping. Sci Data. 2016;. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.55.
55. GWA-Portal. http://gwas.gmi.oeaw.ac.at. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
56. Genomic Diversity and Phenotype Data Model. http://tassel.bitbucket.org/gdpdm. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
57. ISAcreator library. https://github.com/ISA-tools/ISAcreator. Accessed 30 March 2016.
58. Wilkinson M, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data. 2016.
59. Atwell S, et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature. 2010;465:627-31.
60. Mikołajczak K, Ogrodowicz P, Gudyś K, et al. Quantitative trait loci for yield and yield-related traits in spring barley populations derived from crosses between European and Syrian cultivars. PLoS ONE. 2016;. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155938.
61. The ISA Team. http://www.isa-tools.org/team. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
62. ISA-explorer. http://scientificdata.isa-explorer.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
63. COPO project. https://documentation.tgac.ac.uk/display/COPO. Accessed 9 June 2016.
64. ISA-API. https://github.com/ISA-tools/isa-api. Accessed 9 June 2016.
65. ISA-Tab reporting guideline. http://www.biosharing.org/bsg-000078. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
66. Ontology for Biomedical Investigations. http://obi-ontology.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
67. Core Information for Metabolomics Reporting. http://www.biosharing.org/bsg-000175. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
68. Gazetteer. http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/GAZ. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
69. Minimum Information about any (x) Sequence, reporting guideline. http://www.biosharing.org/bsg-000518. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
70. UNIPROT Taxonomy. http://www.uniprot.org/taxonomy. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
71. NCBI Taxonomy http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
72. Ontology of environmental features and habitats http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/ENVO. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
73. PTO, Plant Trait Ontology. https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/PTO. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
74. PO, Plant Ontology. http://www.plantontology.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
75. PATO, Phenotypic Quality Ontology. http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/PATO. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.