Quantitative monitoring of Arabidopsis thaliana growth and development using high-throughput plant phenotyping

Scientific Data

Volumn 3, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Arend, Daniel ^a   Lange, Matthias ^a   Pape, Jean Michel ^a   Weigelt Fischer, Kathleen ^a   Arana Ceballos, Fernando ^a   Mücke, Ingo ^a   Klukas, Christian ^a   Altmann, Thomas ^a   Scholz, Uwe ^a   Junker, Astrid ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN;

ARABIDOPSIS; BIOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GENOME; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHOOT; SOFTWARE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84982110401     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20524463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.55     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Houle, D., Govindaraju, D. R., Omholt, S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nature Reviews Genetics 11, 855-866 (2010).
2. Fiorani, F., Schurr, U. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annual review of plant biology 64, 267-291 (2013).
3. Fahlgren, N., Gehan, M. A., Baxter, I. Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 24, 93-99 (2015).
4. Lobet, G., Draye, X., Périlleux, C. An online database for plant image analysis software tools. Plant Methods 9, 38 (2013).
5. Junker, A. et al. Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems. Frontiers in plant science 5, 770 (2015).
6. Rocca-Serra, P. et al. ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level. Bioinformatics 26, 2354-2356 (2010).
7. Krajewski, P. et al. Towards recommendations for metadata and data handling in plant phenotyping. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 5417-5427 (2015).
8. Törjék, O. et al. Establishment of a high-efficiency SNP-based framework marker set for Arabidopsis. Plant J. 36, 122-140 (2003).
9. Klukas, C., Chen, D., Pape, J. M. Integrated analysis platform: an open-source information system for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Plant physiology 165, 506-518 (2014).
10. Arend, D. et al. PGP repository: a plant phenomics and genomics data publication infrastructure. Database 2016, 1-10 (2016).
11. Arend, D. et al. e!DAL-a framework to store, share and publish research data. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 214 (2014).
12. Harshavardhan, V.T. et al. AtRD22 and AtUSPL1, Members of the Plant-Specific BURP Domain Family Involved in Arabidopsis thaliana Drought Tolerance. PLoS ONE 9(10), 1-14 (2014).
13. Muscolo, A. et al. Phenotypic and metabolic responses to drought and salinity of four contrasting lentil accessions. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 5467-5480 (2015).
14. Fahlgren, N. et al. A versatile phenotyping system and analytics platform reveals diverse temporal responses to water availability in Setaria. Molecular plant 8, 1520-1535 (2015).
15. Chen, D. et al. Dissecting the Phenotypic Components of Crop Plant Growth and Drought Responses Based on High-Throughput Image Analysis. The Plant Cell 26, 1-20 (2014).