PGP repository: A Plant phenomics and genomics data publication infrastructure

Database

Volumn 2016, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Arend, Daniel ^a   Junker, Astrid ^a   Scholz, Uwe ^a   Schüler, Danuta ^a   Wylie, Juliane ^a   Lange, Matthias ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; INTERNET; PLANT; PLANT GENOME; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION;

DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; INTERNET; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PLANTS; PUBLICATIONS;

EID: 84964822503     PISSN: 17580463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/database/baw033     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brooksbank, C. et al. (2014) The European Bioinformatics Institute's data resources 2014. Nucleic Acids Res., 42(Database issue), D18-D25.
2. Craddock, T. et al. (2008) e-Science: relieving bottlenecks in large-scale genome analyses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 6, 948-954.
3. Clarke, L. et al. (2012) The 1000 Genomes Project: data management and community access. Nat. Methods, 9, 459-462.
4. Tellam, R. et al. (2015) The primary reasons behind data sharing, its wider benefits and how to cope with the realities of commercial data. BMC Genom., 16, 1-4.
5. Chavan, V. and Penev, L. (2011) The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. BMC Bioinform., 12(Suppl 15), S1-S12.
6. Kodama, Y. et al. (2012) The Sequence Read Archive: explosive growth of sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res., 40(Database issue), D54-D56.
7. Singh, J. (2011) FigShare. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother., 2, 138-139.
8. Fernandez-Suarez, X. M., Rigden, D. J. and Galperin, M. Y. (2014) The 2014 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue and an updated NAR online Molecular Biology Database Collection. Nucleic Acids Res., 42(Database issue), D1-D6.
9. Monaco, M. K. et al. (2014) Gramene 2013: comparative plant genomics resources. Nucleic Acids Res., 42(Database issue), D1193-D1199.
10. Vines, T. H. et al. (2014) The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Curr. Biol., 24, 94-97.
11. (2009) Data's shameful neglect. Nature, 461, 145.
12. Gibney, E. and Van Noorden, R. (2013) Scientists losing data at a rapid rate. Nature, 504. (doi: 10.1038/nature.2013.14416).
13. Piwowar, H. A. (2011) Who shares? Who doesn't? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data. PLoS One, 6, e18657. 1-13.
14. Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S. and Fridsma, D. B. (2007) Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS One, 2, e308. 1-5.
15. Crosswell, L. C. and Thornton, J. M. (2012) ELIXIR: a distributed infrastructure for European biological data. Trends Biotechnol., 30, 241-242.
16. Lagoze, C. H. and Van de Sompel (2001) The Open Archives Initiative: Building a low-barrier interoperability framework. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2001. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
17. Neumann, J. and Brase, J. (2014) DataCite and DOI names for research data. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 28, 1035-1041.
18. Krajewski, P. et al. (2015) Towards recommendations for metadata and data handling in plant phenotyping. J. Exp. Bot., 66, 5417-5427.
19. Arend, D., et al. (2014) e!DAL-a framework to store, share and publish research data. BMC Bioinform., 15, 1-13.
20. Pampel, H. et al. (2013) Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The re3data.org Registry. PLoS One, 8, e78080. 1-10.
21. Field, D. et al. (2009) 'Omics data sharing. Science, 326, 234-236.
22. Sompel, H. V. et al. (2004) Resource harvesting within the OAI-PMH framework. D-Lib Mag., 10. (http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/3163).
23. Peng, R. D. (2011) Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334, 1226-1227.
24. Weibel, S. (1997) The Dublin core: a simple content description model for electronic resources. Bull. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 24, 9-11.
25. Rocca-Serra, P. et al. (2010) ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level. Bioinformatics, 26, 2354-2356.
26. Neuroth, H. et al. (2010) Nestor Handbuch: eine kleine Enzyklopädie der digitalen Langzeitarchivierung v2.3. Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen, Platz der Gö ttinger Sieben 1, 37073 Gö ttingen, Germany.
27. Field, D. et al. (2010) Meeting Report: BioSharing at ISMB 2010. Stand. Genom. Sci., 3, 254-258.
28. Force, M. M. and Robinson, N. J. (2014) Encouraging data citation and discovery with the Data Citation Index. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 28, 1043-1048.
29. Garfield, E. (2006) Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. Int. J. Epidemiol., 35, 1123-1127, discussion 1127-1128.
30. Schmutzer, T. et al. (2015) Species-wide genome sequence and nucleotide polymorphisms from the model allopolyploid plant Brassica napus. Sci. Data, 2 (doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.72)