The doubleedged sword of legitimacy in public relations

Journal of Communication Management

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 125-143

  L'Etang, Jacquie ^a   Merkelsen, Henrik ^a  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Organizations; Public relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993094799     PISSN: 1363254X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13632541111126355     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Anderson, F.W. and Hadley, L. (1999), Guidelines for Setting Measurable Public Relations Objectives, Institute for Public Relations, Gainesville, FL.
2. Arendt, H. (1961), “Truth and politics”, Between Past and Future. Eight Exercises in Political Thought, Penguin Books, New York, NY, pp. 227-264.
3. Ashford, B.E. and Gibbs, B.W. (1990), “The double-edge of organizational legitimation”, Organization Science, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 177-194.
4. Berger, B.K. (2005), “Power over, power with, and power to relations: critical reflections on public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 5-28.
5. Bernays, E.L. (1977), “Down with image, up with reality”, Public Relations Quarterly, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 12-14.
6. Botan, C. and Hazleton, V. (2006), “Public relations in a new age”, in Ed. Botan, C. and Ed. Hazleton, V. (Eds), Public Relations Theory II, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 1-18.
7. Boyd, J. (2000), “Actional legitimation: no crisis necessary”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 12, pp. 341-353.
8. Broom, G.M. and Dozier, D.M. (1983), “An overview: evaluation research in public relations”, Public Relations Quarterly, Vol. 28, pp. 5-8.
9. Brunsson, N. (1989), The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
10. Brunsson, N. (2003), “Organized hypocrisy”, in Ed. Czarniawska, B. and Ed. Sevón, G. (Eds), Northern Lights: Organization Theory in Scandinavia, Abstrakt Liber Copenhagen Business Press, Oslo, pp. 201-222.
11. Callison, C. (2001), “Do PR practitioners have a PR problem? The effect of associating a source with public relations and client-negative news on audience perception of credibility”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 219-234.
12. Callisson, C. (2004), “The good, the bad, and the ugly: perceptions of public relations practitioners”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 371-389.
13. Cheney, G. and Christensen, L.T. (2001), “Public relations as contested terrain”, in Ed. Heath, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 167-182.
14. Christensen, L.T. and Langer, R. (2009), “Public relations and the strategic use of transparency: consistency, hypocrisy, and corporate change”, in Ed. Heath, R.L., Ed. Toth, E.L. and Ed. Waymer, D. (Eds), Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 129-153.
15. Clark, C.E. (2000), “Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: an analysis”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 363-380.
16. Coombs, W.T. (1992), “The failure of the task force on food assistance: a case study of the role of legitimacy in issue management”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 101-122.
17. Coombs, W.T. and Holladay, S.J. (1996), “Communication and attributions in a crisis: an experimental study in crisis communication”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 279-295.
18. Dahl, R.A. (1957), “The concept of power”, in Ed. Scott, J. (Ed.), Power. Critical Concepts, Vol. 1, Routledge, London, pp. 288-309.
19. Dezenhall, E. and Weber, J. (2007), Damage Control. Why Everything You Know about Crisis Management Is Wrong, Penguin Books, New York, NY.
20. Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975), “Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior”, Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 18, pp. 122-136.
21. Edwards, L. (2006), “Rethinking power in public relations”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 229-231.
22. Ehling, W.P. (1992), “Public relations education and professionalism”, in Ed. Grunig, J.E. (Ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 439-464.
23. Esser, F., Reinemann, C. and Fan, D. (2001), “Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany. Metacommunication about media manipulation”, The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 16-45.
24. Fairchild, M. (2002), “Evaluation: an opportunity to raise the standing of PR”, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 305-7.
25. Freeman, R.E., Rubin, J. and Moriarty, B. (2010), “Et stakeholderperspektiv på corporate communication, værdiskabelse og tillid” (“Corporate communications, value creation, and trust – a stakeholder approach”), in Merkelsen, H. (Ed.), Håndbog i Strategisk Public Relations, Samfundslitteratur, Frederiksberg, pp. 67-86.
26. Gabrielsen, K. (2004), “Loyalty versus conflict in Norwegian practitioners”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 303-311.
27. Galbraith, J.R. (1974), “Organization design: an information-processing view”, Interfaces, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 28-34.
28. Goldman, E.F. (1948), Two-Way Street. The Emergence of the Public Relations Counsel, Bellman Publishing Co., Boston, MA.
29. Gower, K.K. (2006), “Public relations research at the crossroads”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 177-190.
30. Grunig, J.E. (1984), “Organizations, environments, and models for public relations”, Public Relations Research & Education, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 6-29.
31. Grunig, J.E. (2001), “Two-way symmetrical public relations: past, present, and future”, in Ed. Heath, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 11-30.
32. Grunig, J.E. (2006), “Furnishing the edifice: ongoing reseach on public relations as a strategic management function”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 151-176.
33. Grunig, J.E. and Hunt, T. (1984), Managing Public Relations, Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA.
34. Habermas, J. (1979), “Legitimation problems in the modern state”, Communication and the Evolution of Society, Beacon, Boston, MA, pp. 178-205.
35. Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into the Category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Habermas, J. (1990), “Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification”, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 43-115.
37. Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Hallahan, K. (1993), “The paradigm struggle and public relations practice”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 197-205.
39. Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J.H. (1989), Organizational Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
40. Hearit, K.M. (1995), “‘Mistakes were made’: organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy”, Communication Studies, Vol. 46 Nos 1-2, pp. 1-17.
41. Heath, R.L. (2001), “Shifting foundations: public relations as relationship building”, in Ed. Heath, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 1-10.
42. Heath, R.L. (2002), “Issues management: its past, present and future”, Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 209-214.
43. Heath, R.L., Lee, J. and Ni, L. (2009), “Crisis and risk approaches to emergency management planning and communication: the role of similarity and sensitivity”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 123-141.
44. Hon, L.C. (1998), “Demonstrating effectiveness in public relations: goals, objectives, and evaluation”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 103-135.
45. Hoy, P., Raaz, O. and Wehmeier, S. (2006), “From facts to stories or from stories to facts? Analyzing public relations history in public relations textbooks”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 33, pp. 191-200.
46. Hutton, J.G. (1999), “The definition, dimensions, and domain of public relations”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 199-214.
47. Hutton, J.G. (2001), “Defining the relationship between public relations and marketing: public relations' most important challenge”, in Ed. Heath, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 205-214.
48. Kent, M.L. and Taylor, M. (2002), “Toward a dialogic theory of public relations”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 21-37.
49. Kruckeberg, D. (1993), “Universal ethics code: both possible and feasible”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 21-31.
50. Laborde, E.J. and Pompper, D. (2006), “Public relations program evaluation and encroachment effect in the for-profit sector”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 32, pp. 77-79.
51. Lafont, C. (2003), “Procedural justice? Implications of the Rawls-Habermas debate for discourse ethics”, Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 163-181.
52. Larson, M.S. (1977), The Rise of Professionalism, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.
53. L'Etang, J. (1996), “Public relations and rhetoric”, in Ed. L'Etang, J. and Ed. Pieczka, M. (Eds), Critical Perspectives in Public Relations, International Thomson Business Press, London, pp. 106-123.
54. L'Etang, J. and Pieczka, M. (Eds) (1996), “Public relations education”, Critical Perspectives in Public Relations, International Thomson Business Press, London, pp. 1-13.
55. L'Etang, J. and Pieczka, M. (2006 a), in Ed. L'Etang, J. and Ed. Pieczka, M. (Eds), Public Relations. Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
56. L'Etang, J. and Pieczka, M. (2006 b), in Ed. L'Etang, J. and Ed. Pieczka, M. (Eds), Public Relations Education. Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 433-442.
57. Lindenmann, W.K. (1997), Guidelines and Standards for Measuring and Evaluating PR Effectiveness, Institute for Public Relations, Gainesville, FL.
58. Lipset, S.M. (1959), “Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 69-105.
59. Mac Donald, K.M. (1995), The Sociology of the Professions, Sage Publications, London.
60. Machiavelli, N. (1988), The Prince, University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge.
61. Marchand, R. (2001), Creating the Corporate Soul: The Rise of Public Relations and Corporate Imagery in American Big Business, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
62. Massey, J.E. (2001), “Managing legitimacy: communication strategies for organizations in crisis”, Journal of Business Communicaiton, Vol. 38, pp. 153-183.
63. Merkelsen, H. (n.d.), “Risk communications and citizen engagement: what to expect from dialogue” (forthcoming).
64. Metzler, M.S. (2001), “The centrality of organizational legitimacy to public relations practice”, in Ed. Heath, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 321-334.
65. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1991), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, in Ed. Powell, W.W. and Ed. Di Maggio, P.J. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 41-62.
66. Miller, G.R. (1989), “Persuasion and public relations: two Ps in a pod”, in Ed. Botan, C.H. and Ed. Hazleton, V. Jr (Eds), Public Relations Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 45-66.
67. Mitchell, N. (1986), “Corporate power, legitimacy, and social policy”, Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 197-212.
68. Olasky, M.N. (1987), Corporate Public Relations: A New Historical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
69. Parsons, T. (1960), Structure and Process in Modern Societies, Free Press, Clencoe, IL.
70. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row Publishers, New York, NY.
71. Pieczka, M. (2006), “Paradigm, systems, theory, and public relations”, in Ed. L'Etang, J. and Ed. Pieczka, M. (Eds), Public Relations. Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 331-358.
72. Pieczka, M. and L'Etang, J. (2001), “Public relations and the question of professionalism”, in Ed. Heath, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 223-236.
73. Powell, W.W. and Di Maggio, P.J. (Eds) (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
74. Pratt, C.B. (2001), “Issues management: the paradox of the 40-year US tobacco wars”, in Ed. Heath, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations, Vol. 40, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 335-346.
75. Rawls, J. (1993), Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
76. Roper, J. (2005), “Symmetrical communication: excellent public relations or a strategy for hegemony?”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 69-86.
77. Sallot, L.M. (2002), “What the public thinks about public relations: an impression management experiment”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 79, pp. 150-171.
78. Sallot, L.M., Lyon, L.J., Acosta-Alzuru, C. and Jones, K.O. (2003), “From Aardvark to Zebra: a new millennium analysis of theory development in public relations academic journals”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 27-90.
79. Scott, W.R. (1987), “The adolescence of institutional theory”, Administrative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 493-511.
80. Scott, W.R. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
81. Stauber, J. and Rampton, S. (1995), Toxic Sludge Is Good for You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry, Common Courage Press, Monroe, ME.
82. Stoker, K.L. and Tusinski, K.A. (2006), “Reconsidering public relations' infatuation with dialogue: why engagement and reconciliation can be more ethical than symmetry and reciprocity”, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, Vol. 21 Nos 2 / 3, pp. 156-176.
83. Suchman, M.C. (1995), “Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 571-610.
84. Theaker, A. (2004), The Public Relations Handbook, Routledge, Abingdon.
85. van Ruler, B. and Vercic, D. (2005), “Reflective communication management, future ways for public relations research”, Communication Yearbook, Vol. 29, pp. 239-273.
86. Vercic, D., van Ruler, B., Bütschi, G. and Flodin, B. (2001), “On the definition of public relations: a European view”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 373-387.
87. Wæraas, A. (2009), “On Weber: legitimacy and legitimation in public relations”, in Ed. Ihlen, Ø., Ed. van Ruler, B. and Ed. Frederiksson, M. (Eds), Public Relations and Social Theory. Key Figures and Concepts, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 301-321.
88. Weber, M. (1978), in Ed. Roth, G. and Ed. Wittich, C. (Eds), Economy and Society, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.
89. Wilensky, H.L. (1964), “The professionalization of everyone?”, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 70 No. 2, pp. 137-158.
90. Zucker, L.G. (1989), “Combining institutional theory and population ecology: no legitimacy, no history”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 542-5.
91. Plato (1994), Gorgias (trans. Waterfield, R.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
92. van Ruler, B., Vercic, G., Bütschi, G. and Flodin, B. (2004), “A first look for parameters of public relations in Europe”, Journal of Public Relations Research, Vol. 16, pp. 35-63.