Procedural justice?: Implications of the Rawls-Habermas debate for discourse ethics

Philosophy & Social Criticism

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 163-181

  Lafont, Cristina ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

discourse ethics; imperfect procedural justice; John Rawls; J rgen Habermas; moral anti realism; moral cognitivism; moral realism; perfect procedural justice; pure procedural justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992845394     PISSN: 01914537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0191453703029002143     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Habermas, J. (1990) ‘Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification’, in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Habermas, J. (1995) ‘Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on J. Rawls's Political Liberalism’, Journal of Philosophy 92(3): 109-131.
4. Habermas, J. (1996a) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Habermas, J. (1996b) ‘Reply to Symposium Participants, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law’, Cardozo Law Review 17(5): 1477-1558.
6. Habermas, J. (1996c) ‘“Vernünftig” versus “Wahr” oder die Moral der Weltbilder’, in Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 95-127.
7. Habermas, J. (1999) ‘Richtigkeit vs. Wahrheit. Zur Sinn der Sollgeltung moralis-chen Aussagen und Normen’, in Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 271-318. English-language version (forthcoming) Truth and Justification, trans. B. Fultner, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Lafont, C. (1999) The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Rawls, J. (1995) ‘Reply to Habermas’, Journal of Philosophy 92(3): 132-180.