Effects of empowering leadership on performance in management team: Mediating effects of knowledge sharing and team cohesion

Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 43-60

  Tung, Hui Ling ^a   Chang, Yu Hsuan ^b  

^a DA YEH UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b McDonald's   (United States)

Author keywords

Empowerment; Knowledge sharing; Leadership; Managers; Taiwan; Team performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993093663     PISSN: 20408005     EISSN: 20408013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/20408001111148720     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Abrahamson, E. (1996), “Management fashion”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, pp. 254-285.
2. Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J. and Rapp, A. (2005), “To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behaviour on customer satisfaction and performance”, Academy of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 945-955.
3. Amabile, T.M., Schatzel, E.A., Moneta, G.B. and Kramer, S.J. (2004), “Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: perceived leader support”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 1, pp. 5-32.
4. Amy, E. (1999), “Psychological safety and leaning behavior in work teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 350-383.
5. Antonuccio, D.O., Davis, C., Lewinsohn, P.M. and Breckenridge, J.S. (1987), “Therapist variables related to cohesiveness in a group treatment for depression”, Small Group Behavior, Vol. 18, pp. 557-564.
6. Argote, L. (1999), Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge, Kluwer, Boston, MA.
7. Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A. and Drasgow, F. (2000), “The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, pp. 249-269.
8. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 1173-82.
9. Barrick, M.R., Bradley, B.H. and Colbert, A.E. (2002), “The moderating role of top management team interdependence: implications for real teams and working groups”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, pp. 544-557.
10. Beal, D.J., Cohen, R.R., Burke, M.J. and Mc Lendon, C.L. (2003), “Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta analytic clarification of construct relations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, pp. 989-1004.
11. Bennis, W.G. and Townsend, R. (1997), Reinventing Leadership: Strategies to Empower the Organization, Morrow/Avon, New York, NY.
12. Brislin, R.W. (1980), “Translation and content analysis of oral and written material”, in Ed. Triandis, H.C. and Ed. Berry, J.W. (Eds), Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology, Vol. 2, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA, pp. 349-444.
13. Bunderson, J.S. and Sutcliffe, K.M. (2002), “Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: process and performance effects”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, pp. 875-893.
14. Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J. and Higgs, A.C. (1993), “Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 46, pp. 823-850.
15. Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz, M.A. and Sanders, W.G. (2004), “Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition”, Journal of Management, Vol. 30, pp. 749-778.
16. Carron, A.V. and Brawley, L.R. (2000), “Cohesion: conceptual and measurement issues”, Small Group Research, Vol. 31, pp. 89-106.
17. Carron, A.V., Brawley, L.R. and Widmeyer, W.N. (1998), “Measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups”, in Ed. Duda, J.L. (Ed.), Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement, Fitness Information Technology, Morgantown, WV, pp. 213-226.
18. Carron, A.V., Widmeyer, W.N. and Brawley, L.R. (1985), “The development of an instrument to measure cohesion in sport teams: the group environment questionnaire”, Journal of Sport Psychology, Vol. 7, pp. 244-266.
19. Chang, A. and Bordia, P. (2001), “A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship”, Small Group Research, Vol. 32, pp. 379-405.
20. Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E. (1997), “What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite”, Journal of Management, Vol. 23, pp. 239-290.
21. Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1988), “The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, pp. 471-482.
22. Devine, D.J. and Phillips, J.L. (2001), “Do smarter teams do better? A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance”, Small Group Research, Vol. 32, pp. 507-532.
23. Druskat, V.U. and Wheeler, J.V. (2003), “Managing from the boundary: the effective leadership of self-managing work teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46, pp. 435-457.
24. Elron, E. (1997), “Top management teams within multinational corporations: effects of cultural heterogeneity”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 4, pp. 393-413.
25. Ensley, M.D., Pearson, A.W. and Amason, A.C. (2002), “Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 17, pp. 365-386.
26. Evans, M.G. (1991), “The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: interactions revisited”, American Psychologist, Vol. 46, pp. 6-15.
27. Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D.C. (1990), “Top-management team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 484-503.
28. Ford, R.C. and Fottler, M.D. (1995), “Empowerment: a matter of degree”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 21-29.
29. Gibson, C.B. and Gibbs, J.L. (2006), “Unpacking the concept of virtuality: the effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 451-495.
30. Gladstein, D.L. (1984), “Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, pp. 499-517.
31. Gully, S.M., Devine, D.J. and Whitney, D.J. (1995), “A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: effects of level of analysis and task interdependence”, Small Group Research, Vol. 26, pp. 497-520.
32. Gupta, V.K., Huang, R. and Niranjan, S. (2010), “A longitudinal examination of the relationship between team leadership and performance”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 17, pp. 335-350.
33. Hackman, J. R. (1987), “The design of work teams”, in Ed. Lorsch, J.W. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 315-342.
34. Holmbeck, G.N. (1997), “Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 599-610.
35. House, R.J. and Dessler, G. (1974), “The path goal theory of leadership: some post hoc and a priori tests”, in Ed. Hunt, J. and Ed. Larson, L. (Eds), Contingency Approaches to Leadership, Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale, IL, pp. 29-55.
36. Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M. and Jundt, D. (2005), “Teams in organizations: from I-P-O models to IMOI models”, in Ed. Fiske, S.T., Ed. Kasdin, A.E. and Ed. Schacter, D.L. (Eds), Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 56, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 485-516.
37. James, L.R., Demaree, R.G. and Wolf, G. (1984), “Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, pp. 85-98.
38. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (1989), Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research, Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.
39. Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F. and Ilies, R. (2004), “The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 36-51.
40. Katzenbach, J.R. and Smith, D.K. (1993), “The discipline of teams”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, pp. 111-121.
41. Keller, R.T. (1986), “Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 715-726.
42. Kirkman, B.L. and Rosen, B. (1999), “Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, pp. 58-74.
43. Lawler, E.J., Thye, S.R. and Yoon, J. (2000), “Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 106, pp. 616-657.
44. Liebowitz, J. (1999), Knowledge Management Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
45. Littlepage, G.E., Cowart, L. and Kerr, B. (1989), “Relationships between group environment scales and group performance and cohesion”, Small Group Research, Vol. 20, pp. 50-61.
46. Locke, E.A., Alavi, M. and Wagner, J. (1997), “Participation in decision-making: one more look”, in Ed. Ferris, G.R. (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 15, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 293-331.
47. Lubatkin, M., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y. and Veiga, J.F. (2006), “Ambidexterity and performance on small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration”, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, pp. 646-672.
48. Mc Neil, K., Kelly, F. and Mc Neil, J. (1975), Testing Research Hypotheses Using Multiple Linear Regression, South Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
49. Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E. and Zaccaro, S.J. (2001), “A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, pp. 356-376.
50. Mathieu, J., Gilson, L.L. and Rubby, T.M. (2006), “Empowerment and team effectiveness: an empirical test of an integrated model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, pp. 97-108.
51. Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T. and Gilson, L. (2008), “Team effectiveness 1997-2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future”, Journal of Management, Vol. 34, pp. 410-476.
52. Mayer, D.M., Ehrhart, M.G. and Schneider, B. (2009), “Service attribute boundary conditions of the service climate-customer satisfaction link”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52, pp. 1034-50.
53. Mullen, B. and Copper, C. (1994), “The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 115, pp. 210-227.
54. Nathan, B.R., Mohrman, A.M. Jr and Milliman, J. (1991), “Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: a longitudinal study”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 352-369.
55. O'Reilly, C.A., Caldwell, D.F. and Barnett, W.P. (1989), “Work group demography, social integration and turnover”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 34, pp. 21-38.
56. Peccei, R. and Rosenthal, P. (2001), “Delivering customer-oriented behaviour through empowerment: an empirical test of RM assumptions”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 831-857.
57. Pelled, L.H., Eisenhardt, K.M. and Xin, K.R. (1999), “Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 1-28.
58. Podsakoff, P.M., Mac Kenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, pp. 879-903.
59. Robert, C., Probst, T.M., Martocchio, J.J., Drasgow, F. and Lawler, J.J. (2000), “Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, pp. 643-658.
60. Seibert, S.E., Silver, S.R. and Randolph, W.A. (2004), “Taking empowerment to the next level: a multiple level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, pp. 332-349.
61. Senge, P. (1997), “Sharing knowledge: the leader's role is key to a learning culture”, Executive Excellence, Vol. 4, pp. 17-18.
62. Shaw, M.E. (1981), Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, NY.
63. Sigler, T.H. and Pearson, C.M. (2000), “Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment”, Journal of Quality Management, Vol. 5, pp. 27-52.
64. Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M., Veiga, J. and Dino, R. (2005), “Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, pp. 69-84.
65. Smith, K.G., Smith, K.A., Olian, J.D., Sims, H.P., O'Bannon, D.P. and Scully, J.A. (1994), “Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication”, Administration Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, pp. 412-438.
66. Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Mathieu, J.E. and Kraiger, K. (2005), “Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 523-535.
67. Spreitzer, G. (1995), “Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 1442-65.
68. Srivastava, A., Bartol, K.M. and Locke, E.A. (2006), “Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 1239-51.
69. Stasser, G. and Titus, W. (1985), “Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 1467-78.
70. Steiner, I.D. (1972), Group Process and Productivity, Academic Press, New York, NY.
71. Stewart, G.L. and Barrick, M.R. (2000), “Team structure and performance: assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, pp. 135-148.
72. Tekleab, A.G., Quigley, N.R. and Tesluk, P.E. (2009), “A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness”, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 34, pp. 170-205.
73. Thomas, K.W. and Velthouse, B.A. (1990), “Cognitive elements of empowerment: an ‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, pp. 666-681.
74. Wageman, R. (1995), “Interdependence and group effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 145-180.
75. Yalom, I.D. (1995), The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, Basic Books, New York, NY.
76. Yukl, G. and Fu, P.P. (1999), “Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20, pp. 219-232.
77. Zhang, X.M. and Bartol, K.M. (2010), “Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 107-128.
78. Yukl, G. (2002), Leadership in Organization, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.