A paradigmatic view of contemporary public administration research: An empirical test

Administration and Society

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 138-165

  Lan, Zhiyong ^a   Anders, Kathleen K ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034385362     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00953990022019380     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allison, G., Jr. (1979). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects. In J. L. Perry & K. L. Kramer (Eds.), Public management: Public and private perspective (pp. 72-92). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
2. Anders, K. K. (1997). Performance budgeting in the states: Practitioners' views on accountability, discretion and reform (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58-03A, 1080.
3. Bingham, R. D., & Bowen, W. M. (1994). "Mainstream" public administration over time: A topical content analysis. Public Administration Review, 54, 204-208.
4. Box, R. C. (1994). An examination of the debate over research in public administration. In J. D. White & G. B. Adams (Eds.), Research in public administration reflections on theory and practice (pp. 75-90). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Bozeman, B., & Scott, P. (1996). Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: Untangling conceptual knots. American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1-18.
7. Carrol, J. D. (1997). The welfare on and over American government in Waldonian perspective. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 200-204.
8. Denhardt, R. B. (1981). Toward a critical theory of public organization. Public Administration Review, 41, 628-635.
9. Forrester, J. P., & Watson, S. S. (1994). An assessment of public administration journals: The perspective of editors and editorial board members. Public Administration Review, 54, 474-485.
10. Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Frederickson, H. G. (1971). Toward a new public administration. In F. Marini (Ed.), Toward a new public administration (pp. 309-331). Scranton, PA: Chandler.
12. Gawthrop, L. C. (1997). Democracy, bureaucracy, and hypocrisy redux: A search for sympathy and compassion. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 205-210.
13. Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and administration: A study in government. New York: Russell & Russell.
14. Houston, D. J., & Delevan, S. M. (1990). Public administration research: An assessment of journal publications. Public Administration Review, 50(6), 674-685.
15. Houston, D. J., & Delevan, S. M. (1994). A comparative assessment of public administration journal publications. Administration & Society, 26(2), 252-271.
16. Houston, R. P. (1990). Public administration research: An assessment of journal publications. Public Administration Review, 50, 674-681.
17. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Kuhn, T. S. (1990). Dubbing and redubbing: The vulnerability of rigid designation. In Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 174-181). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Lan, Z., & Rainey, H. G. (1992). Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private and hybrid organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 5-28.
20. Marini, F. (Ed.). (1971). Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
21. Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 59-90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. McCurdy, H. (1986). Public administration: A bibliographic guide to the literature. New York: Marcel Dekker.
23. Meier, K. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 193-199.
24. Murray, M. A. (1975). Comparing public and private management: An exploratory essay. Public Administration Review, 35(4), 582-597.
25. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. A. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Ostrom, V. (1989). The intellectual crisis in American public administration (2nd ed.). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
27. Perry, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1990). Research methodology in the public administration: Issues and patterns. In N. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: The state of the discipline (pp. 347-372). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
28. Perry, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1994). Research methodology in the Public Administration Review, 1975-1984. In J. D. White & G. B. Adams (Eds.), Research in public administration reflections on theory and practice (pp. 1-24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Rainey, H. G. (1979). Perceptions of incentives in business and government: Implications for civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 39, 440-448.
30. Rainey, H. G. (1991). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Rainey, H. G. (1994). On paradigms, progress, and prospects for public management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 41-48.
32. Rosenbloom, D. H. (1983). Public administration theory and the separation of powers. Public Administration Review, 43, 219-226.
33. Sherwood, F. (1997). Responding to the decline in public service professionalism. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 211-217.
34. Stallings, R. A., & Ferris, J. A. (1988). Public administration research: Work in PAR, 1940-1984. Public Administration Review, 48, 580-587.
35. Stillman, R. J. (1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York: St. Martin's.
36. Straussman, J. D. (1986). Courts and public purse strings: Have portraits of budgeting missed something? Public Administration Review, 46, 345-351.
37. Straussman, J. D. (1988). Rights-based budgeting. In I. S. Rubin (Ed.), New directions in budget theory (pp. 100-123). Albany: State University of New York Press.
38. Thomas Kuhn. (1996, June 26). The Tech, 116(28), 9.
39. Waldo, D. (1968). Scope and theory of public administration. In J. C. Charlesworth (Ed.), Theory and practice of public administration: Scope, objectives and methods (pp. 1-26). Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
40. Waldo, D. (1984). The administrative state (2nd ed.). New York: Homes and Meier. (Original work published 1948)
41. Wamsley, G. L., & Zolad, M. N. (1973). The political economy of public organizations. In J. Perry & K. Kraemer (Eds.), Public management: Public and private perspectives (pp. 133-141). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
42. White, J. S., & Adams, G. B. (1994). Making sense with diversity: The context of research, theory, and knowledge development in public administration. In J. D. White & G. B. Adams (Eds.), Research in public administration reflections on theory and practice (pp. 1-24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Wildavsky, A. (1992). The new politics of the budgetary process. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
44. Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 210-212.