Exploiting the Imidazolium Effect in Base-free Ammonium Enolate Generation: Synthetic and Mechanistic Studies

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 55, Issue 46, 2016, Pages 14394-14399

  Young, Claire M ^a   Stark, Daniel G ^a   West, Thomas H ^a   Taylor, James E ^a   Smith, Andrew D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

imidazolium effect; isothiourea catalysis; mechanistic study; Michael addition; N acyl imidazoles

Indexed keywords

ADDITION REACTIONS; CYCLIZATION; MECHANICS; THIOUREAS;

CYCLIZATION REACTIONS; ENANTIOSELECTIVE MICHAEL ADDITION; HIGH STEREOSELECTIVITIES; HYDROCHLORIDE SALTS; IMIDAZOLIUM; ISOTHIOUREA; MECHANISTIC STUDIES; MICHAEL ADDITIONS;

OLEFINS;

EID: 84992504728     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: 15213773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201608046     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. For reviews on the generation and use of ammonium enolates, see:
2. S. France, D. J. Guerin, S. J. Miller, T. Lectka, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2985–3012;
3. M. J. Gaunt, C. C. C. Johansson, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5596–5605;
4. D. H. Paull, A. Weatherwax, T. Lectka, Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 6771–6803;
5. L. C. Morrill, A. D. Smith, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6214–6226.
6. For seminal examples, see:
7. R. Tennyson, D. Romo, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7248–7252;
8. A. E. Taggi, A. M. Hafez, H. Wack, B. Young, D. Ferraris, T. Lectka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6626–6635;
9. C. Zhu, X. Shen, S. G. Nelson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5352–5353.
10. L. C. Morrill, L. A. Ledingham, J.-P. Couturier, J. Bickel, A. D. Harper, C. Fallan, A. D. Smith, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 624–636.
11. T. H. West, D. S. B. Daniels, A. M. Z. Slawin, A. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4476–4479;
12. K. J. Schwarz, J. L. Amos, J. C. Klein, D. T. Do, T. N. Snaddon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5214–5217.
13. For seminal examples, see:
14. G. S. Cortez, R. L. Tennyson, D. Romo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7945–7946;
15. S. H. Oh, G. S. Cortez, D. Romo, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2835–2838;
16. H. Henry-Riyad, C. Lee, V. C. Purohit, D. Romo, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4363–4366;
17. C. A. Leverett, V. C. Purohit, D. Romo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9479–9483;
18. Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 9669–9673;
19. D. Belmessieri, L. C. Morrill, C. Simal, A. M. Z. Slawin, A. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2714–2720.
20. For seminal work, see:
21. R. Wolfenden, W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 4390–4393;
22. W. P. Jencks, D. G. Oakenfull, K. Salvesen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 188–194.
23. J. A. Grzyb, M. Shen, C. Yoshina-Ishii, W. Chi, R. S. Brown, R. A. Batey, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7153–7175.
24. E. K. Woodman, J. G. K. Chaffey, P. A. Hopes, D. R. J. Hose, J. P. Gilday, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2009, 13, 106–113.
25. S. T. Heller, T. Fu, R. Sarpong, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1970–1973.
26. DMAP salts effectively catalyse acylations via N-acyl ammonium intermediate formation under base-free conditions, see:
27. A. Sakakura, K. Kawajiri, T. Ohkubo, Y. Kosugi, K. Ishihara, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14775–14779;
28. D. Vuluga, J. Legros, B. Crousse, D. Bonnet-Delpon, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 1776–1779;
29. Z. Liu, Q. Ma, Y. Liu, Q. Wang, Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 236–239.
30. A. Lee, A. Younai, C. K. Price, J. Izquierdo, R. K. Mishra, K. A. Scheidt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10589–10592;
31. A. Lee, K. A. Scheidt, Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3407–3410.
32. Enders has reported the use of α,β-unsaturated N-acyltriazoles as α,β-unsaturated acyl azolium precursors for annulations with 1,3-dicarbonyls under basic conditions, see: Q. Ni, J. Xiong, X. Song, G. Raabe, D. Enders, Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 14628–14631.
33. For reviews on isothioureas as Lewis base catalysts, see:
34. J. E. Taylor, S. D. Bull, J. M. J. Williams, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2109–2121;
35. J. Merad, J.-M. Pons, O. Chuzel, C. Bressy, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201600399;
36. L. C. Morrill, A. D. Smith, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6214–6226.
37. For the corresponding reaction under basic conditions starting from arylacetic acids, see: L. C. Morrill, J. Douglas, T. Lebl, A. M. Z. Slawin, D. J. Fox, A. D. Smith, Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 4146–4155.
38. A control experiment in the absence of tetramisole⋅HCl 3 led to the formation of (±)-4 in 28 % yield, suggesting a base-promoted background process is responsible for the observed reactivity.
39. The absolute and relative configuration of the product was confirmed by comparison of its specific rotation and spectral data with the literature, Ref. [14].
40. For a complete reaction optimization table, see the Supporting Information.
41. The absolute and relative configuration of the product was confirmed by comparison of its specific rotation and spectral data with the literature: P.-P. Yeh, D. S. B. Daniels, C. Fallan, E. Gould, C. Simal, J. E. Taylor, A. M. Z. Slawin, A. D. Smith, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 2177–2191.
42. The absolute and relative configuration of the product were assigned by analogy to the other series reported.
43. The same equilibrium position was obtained starting from a mixture of N-acyl ammonium 32, obtained from the reaction of (+)-BTM 5 with phenacyl chloride, and imidazole 33.
44. See the Supporting Information for more details.
45. The observed cross-over may occur via an intermediate N,N′-diacyl imidazolium species, although no direct evidence for this could be obtained. Alternatively, the in situ formation of a ketene intermediate is another possible pathway.
46. For reviews on this technique, see:
47. D. G. Blackmond, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4302–4320;
48. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 4374–4393;
49. D. G. Blackmond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10852–10866.
50. Synthetically, this gave product 11 in 70 % NMR yield, 86:14 d.r. and 81:19 e.r.
51. J. Burés, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2028–2031;
52. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 2068–2071.
53. See the Supporting Information for full reaction profiles and analysis.
54. The same order in catalyst could also be obtained by initial rate analysis. See the Supporting Information for more details.
55. The remaining minor discrepancy between the time-adjusted same-excess profile containing imidazole 33 and the original data may be due to either experimental error or minimal catalyst deactivation.
56. For other examples of complex reaction kinetics due at least in part to no definitive catalyst resting state, see:
57. S. Y. Lee, J. M. Murphy, A. Ukai, G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15149–15153;
58. L. Mesas-Sánchez, P. Dinér, Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 5623–5631.
59. V. B. Birman, X. Li, Z. Han, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 37–40;
60. P. Liu, X. Yang, V. B. Birman, K. N. Houk, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3288–3291.
61. The research data underpinning this publication can be found at DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17630/346a5fe8-a636-46e8-9933-71db82f0083a.