Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: A systematic review of systematic reviews (an update)

Implementation Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Ross, Jamie ^a   Stevenson, Fiona ^a   Lau, Rosa ^a   Murray, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

E Health; Implementation; Synthesis; Systematic review; Update

Indexed keywords

CINAHL; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; COCHRANE LIBRARY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMBASE; ETHNOGRAPHY; EUROPE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MEDLINE; NORTH AMERICA; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCINFO; REGISTRATION; SECONDARY HEALTH CARE; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELEHEALTH; APTITUDE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COST; ECONOMICS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; LITERATURE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; STANDARDS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TELEMEDICINE; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UTILIZATION;

APTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH PLANNING; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TELEMEDICINE; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84992391288     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Currie WL, Seddon JJ. A cross-national analysis of eHealth in the European Union: some policy and research directions. Inf Manage. 2014;51(6):783-97.
2. Lewis T, Synowiec C, Lagomarsino G, Schweitzer J. E-health in low- and middle-income countries: findings from the Center for Health Market Innovations. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(5):332-40.
3. van Gemert-Pijnen J, Wynchank S, Covvey H, Ossebaard H. Improving the credibility of electronic health technologies. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(5):323-A.
4. Wachter RM. Making IT Work: Harnessing the power of health information technology to improve care in England. Report of the National Advisory Group on Health Information Technology in England. 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/550866/Wachter_Review_Accessible.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2016.
5. NHS England. Five Year Forward View. 2014. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf. Accessed 17 Jun 2016.
6. Computing. Addenbrooke's Hospital £200m IT system proves an epic fail. 2015. http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/2427100/addenbrookes-hospital-gbp200m-it-system-proves-an-epic-fail. Accessed 17 Jun 2016.
7. Mair FS, May C, O'Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, Murray E. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(5):357-64.
8. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
9. Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Exploring the challenges of implementing e-health: a protocol for an update of a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006773.
10. Smith V, Devane D, Begley C, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):15.
11. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.
12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 2009;339:b2700.
13. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage;1988.
14. Bearman M, Dawson P. Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):252-60.
15. Adaji A, Schattner P, Jones K. The use of information technology to enhance diabetes management in primary care: a literature review. Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(3):229-37.
16. Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(4):515-22.
17. Benavides-Vaello S, Strode A, Sheeran BC. Using technology in the delivery of mental health and substance abuse treatment in rural communities: a review. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013;40(1):111-20.
18. Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:231.
19. Botsis T, Hartvigsen G. Current status and future perspectives in telecare for elderly people suffering from chronic diseases. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(4):195-203.
20. Broens TH, Huis in't Veld RM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJ. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(6):303-9.
21. Castillo VH, Martinez-Garcia AI, Pulido JR. A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:60.
22. Demaerschalk BM, Miley ML, Kiernan T-EJ, et al. Stroke Telemedicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2009;84(1):53-64.
23. Fitzpatrick L, Melnikas A, Weathers M, Kachnowski S. Understanding communication capacity. Communication patterns and ICT usage in clinical settings. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2007;22(3):34-41.
24. Fontaine P, Ross SE, Zink T, Schilling LM. Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(5):655-70.
25. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. 2012;36(1):241-77.
26. Gagnon MP, Legare F, Labrecque M, Fremont P, Pluye P, Gagnon J, Car J, et al. Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD006093.
27. Gagnon M-P, Nsangou E-R, Payne-Gagnon J, Grenier S, Sicotte C. Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription: a systematic review of user groups' perceptions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(3):535-41.
28. Goldstein DH, Phelan R, Wilson R, Ross-White A, VanDenKerkhof EG, Penning JP, et al. Brief review: adoption of electronic medical records to enhance acute pain management. Can J Anesth. 2014;61(2):164-79.
29. Gruber D, Cummings GG, Leblanc L, Smith DL. Factors influencing outcomes of clinical information systems implementation: a systematic review. Comput Inform Nurs. 2009;27(3):151-63.
30. Hsieh CT, Lin B. Information technology for competitive advantage: the case of learning and innovation in behavioural healthcare service. Int J Electron Healthc. 2011;6(2-4):213-28.
31. Jarvis-Selinger S, Chan E, Payne R, Plohman K, Ho K. Clinical telehealth across the disciplines: lessons learned. Telemed e-Health. 2008;14(7):720-5.
32. Jennett PA, Gagnon MP, Brandstadt HK. Preparing for success: readiness models for rural telehealth. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51(4):279.
33. Jennett PA, Scott RE, Affleck Hall L, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, Young B, Lorenzetti D. Policy implications associated with the socioeconomic and health system impact of telehealth: a case study from Canada. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(1):77-83.
34. Kilsdonk E, Peute LW, Knijnenburg SL, Jaspers MW. Factors known to influence acceptance of clinical decision support systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:150-4.
35. Kukafka R, Johnson SB, Linfante A, Allegrante JP. Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: a systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36(3):218-27.
36. Lau F, Price M, Boyd J, Partridge C, Bell H, Raworth R. Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:10.
37. Lluch M. Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies-a literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(12):849-62.
38. Lu YC, Xiao Y, Sears A, Jacko JA. A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(5):409-22.
39. Ludwick DA, Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(1):22-31.
40. Mack EH, Wheeler DS, Embi PJ. Clinical decision support systems in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatric Crit Care Med. 2009;10(1):23-8.
41. McGinn CA, Grenier S, Duplantie J, Shaw N, Sicotte C, Mathieu L, et al. Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:46.
42. Mollon B, Chong JJ, Holbrook AM, Sung M, Thabane L, Foster G. Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9(1):11.
43. Moxey A, Robertson J, Newby D, Hains I, Williamson M, Pearson SA. Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: provision does not guarantee uptake. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(1):25-33.
44. Ohinmaa A. What lessons can be learned from telemedicine programmes in other countries? J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12 suppl 2:40-4.
45. Oluoch T, Santas X, Kwaro D, Were M, Biondich P, Bailey C, et al. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(10):e83-92.
46. Oroviogoicoechea C, Elliott B, Watson R. Review: evaluating information systems in nursing. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(5):567-75.
47. Orwat C, Graefe A, Faulwasser T. Towards pervasive computing in health care-a literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8(1):26.
48. Peleg M, Tu S. Decision support, knowledge representation and management in medicine. Yearbook Med Inform. 2006:72-80.
49. Police RL, Foster T, Wong KS. Adoption and use of health information technology in physician practice organisations: systematic review. Inform Prim Care. 2010;18(4):245-58.
50. Rahimi B, Vimarlund V, Timpka T. Health information system implementation: a qualitative meta-analysis. J Med Syst. 2009;33(5):359-68.
51. Saliba V, Legido-Quigley H, Hallik R, Aaviksoo A, Car J, McKee M. Telemedicine across borders: a systematic review of factors that hinder or support implementation. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(12):793-809.
52. Shekelle P, Morton SC, Keeler EB. Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Apr. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 132.)Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK37988/.
53. Stolee P, Steeves B, Glenny C, Filsinger S. The use of electronic health information systems in home care: facilitators and barriers. Home Healthc Nurse. 2010;28(3):167-79.
54. Studer M. The effect of organizational factors on the effectiveness of EMR system implementation-what have we learned? Healthc Q. 2005;8(4):92-8.
55. Vreeman DJ, Taggard SL, Rhine MD, Worrell TW. Evidence for electronic health record systems in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86(3):434-46.
56. Waneka R, Spetz J. Hospital information technology systems' impact on nurses and nursing care. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(12):509-14.
57. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Medical Care Research and Review. 2007;64(6):650-72.
58. Yusof MM, Stergioulas L, Zugic J. Health information systems adoption: findings from a systematic review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(1):262.
59. Charnock D, Shepperd S. Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res. 2004;19(4):440-6.
60. Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN, Dziedzic K, Treweek S, Eldridge S, et al. Achieving change in primary care-causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):1-39.
61. Atkinson NL, Massett HA, Mylks C, McCormack LA, Kish-Doto J, Hesse BW, et al. Assessing the impact of user-centered research on a clinical trial eHealth tool via counterbalanced research design. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(1):24-31.