Exploring the challenges of implementing e-health: A protocol for an update of a systematic review of reviews

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Ross, Jamie ^a   Stevenson, Fiona ^a   Lau, Rosa ^a   Murray, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CINAHL; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONSENSUS; EMBASE; MEDLINE; PSYCINFO; REVIEW; TELEHEALTH; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; DEVICES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HUMAN; LITERATURE; TELEMEDICINE;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84929224648     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006773     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Currie WL, Seddon JJ. A cross-national analysis of eHealth in the European Union: some policy and research directions. Info Manage 2014;51:783-97.
2. Lewis T, Synowiec C, Lagomarsino G, et al. E-health in low- and middle-income countries: findings from the Center for Health Market Innovations. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:332-40.
3. Xiao N, Sharman R, Rao HR, et al. Factors influencing online health information search: an empirical analysis of a national cancer-related survey. Decis Support Syst 2014;57:417-27.
4. Office for National Statistics. Internet Access - Households and Individuals, 2013. 2013.
5. Sahu M, Grover A, Joshi A. Role of mobile phone technology in health education in Asian and African countries: a systematic review. Int J Electron Healthc 2014;7:269-86.
6. van Gemert-Pijnen J, Wynchank S, Covvey H, et al. Improving the credibility of electronic health technologies. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:323-323A.
7. European Commission. eHealth Action Plan 2012-2020. 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/key-documents/index-en.htm.
8. Waterson P. Health information technology and sociotechnical systems: a progress report on recent developments within the UK National Health Service (NHS). Appl Ergon 2014;45: 150-61.
9. Public Accounts Committee. The national programme for IT in the NHS: an update on the delivery of detailed care records systems. UK: 2011 Forty-fifth Report of Session 2010-12.
10. Ben-Assuli O. Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments. Health Policy 2015;119:287-97.
11. Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN, et al. Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005548.
12. Sugarhood P, Wherton J, Procter R, et al. Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2013;9:79-87.
13. Stroetmann KA, Artmann J, Dumortier J, et al. United in Diversity: legal challenges on the road towards interoperable eHealth solutions in Europe. EJBI 2012;8:3-10.
14. Mair FS, May C, O'Donnell C, et al. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:357-64.
15. Higgins J, Green S, Scholten R. Chapter 3: Maintaining reviews: updates, amendments and feedback. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
16. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 2005.