Effects of supplementation of multi-enzyme and multi-species probiotic on production performance, egg quality, cholesterol level and immune system in laying hens

Journal of Applied Animal Research

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 386-398

  Khan, Sohail Hassan ^a   Atif, Muhammad ^b   Mukhtar, Nasir ^b   Rehman, Abdul ^a   Fareed, Ghulam ^a  

^a POULTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Pakistan)

^b PMAS ARID AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Cholesterol; Egg production; Egg quality; Immunity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992171954     PISSN: 09712119     EISSN: 09741844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2011.621538     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Aaron JC. 2010. A Review: strategic selection of exogenous enzymes for corn/soy-based poultry diets. The Journal of poultry Science 47:1-7.
2. Abd El-Maksoud AAA. 2006. Effect of different levels of olive pulp without or with Kemzyme supplementation on laying hens performance. Egypt Poultry Science 26(3):991-1010.
3. Abdel-Azeem FA, Nematallah GM, Ibrahim Faten AA. 2005. Effect of dietary protein level with some natural biological feed additives supplementation on productive and physiological performance of Japanese quail. Egypt Poultry Science 25(2):497-525.
4. Acamovic T. 2001. Enzymes for poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal 57:225-242.
5. Aderemi FA, Lawall TE, Alabi OM, Ladokun OA, Adeyemo GO. 2006. Effect of enzyme supplemented cassava root sieviate on egg quality, gut morphology and performance of egg type chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 5(6):526-529.
6. Aman P, Graham H. 1990. Chemical evaluation of polysaccharides in animal feeds. In: Wiseman J, Cole DJA, editors. Feedstuff evaluation. London: Butterworths. p. 161-167.
7. AOAC. 2011. Official methods of analytical chemist. 18th ed. published by AOAC International, North Frederick Avenue, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
8. Ar A, Paganelli CV, Reeves RB, Greene DG, Rahn H. 1974. The avian egg: water vapour conductance, shell thickness and functional pore area. The Condor 76:153-158.
9. Arun KP, Savaram SRR, Manteta VLNR, Sita SS. 2007. Effect of probiotic (Lactobacillus sporogenes) feeding on egg production and quality, yolk cholesterol and humoral immune response of White Leghorn layer breeders. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88(1):43-47.
10. Bain MM. 1991. A reinterpretation of egg shell strength. In: Solomon SE, editor Egg and eggshell quality. Aylesbury: Wolfe Publishing Limited. p. 131-145.
11. Balevi T, Ucan US, Coskun B, Kurtolu V, Cetingül S. 2001. Effects of dietary probiotic on performance and humoral immune response in layer hens. Poultry Science 42:456-461.
12. Balevi T, Uc¸an US, Coskun B, Kurtoglu V, Cetingul S. 2009. Effect of dietary probiotic on performance and humoral immune response in layer hens. Archiva Zootechnica 12(2):14-23.
13. Bedford MR, Schulze H. 1998. Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutrition Research Reviews 11:91-114.
14. Berrin KG. 2011. Effects of probiotic and prebiotic (mannanoligosaccharide) supplementation on performance, egg quality and hatchability in quail breeders. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 58:27-32.
15. Braufau J, Perez-Vendrell AM, Estev-Garcia E. 1994. Performance of laying hens as affected by the supplementation of barley based diet with a crude enzyme preparation from Trichoderma virde. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74:129-133.
16. Broz J, Oldale P, Perrin-Voltz AH, Rychen G, Schulze J, Simoes-Nunes C. 1994. Effects of supplemental phytase on performance and phosphorus utilization in broiler chickens fed a low phosphorus diet without addition of inorganic phosphates. British Poultry Science 35:273-280.
17. Chen YC, Nakthon GC, Chen TC. 2005. Improvement of laying hen performance by dietary prebiotic chicory oligofructose and inulin. International Journal of Poultry Science 4:103-108.
18. Cheng Y, Lee D, Wen C, Weng C. 2004. Effects of [beta]- glucan supplementation on lymphocyte proliferation, macrophage chemotaxis and specific immune responses in broilers. Asian-Australasain Journal of Animal Sciences 17:1145-1149.
19. Chesson A. 2001. Non-starch polysaccharide degrading enzymes in poultry diets: influence of ingredients on the selection of activities. World’s Poultry Science Journal 57:251-263.
20. Choct M, Hughes RJ, Trimble RP, Angkanaporn K, Annison G. 1995. Non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes increase the performance of broiler chickens fed wheat of low apparent metabolizable energy. Journal of Nutrition 125:485-492.
21. Çiftci I, Yenice E, Eleroglu H. 2003. Use of triticale alone and in combination with wheat or maize: effects of diet type and enzyme supplementation on hen performance, egg quality, organ weights, intestinal viscosity and digestive system characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 105:149-161.
22. Coates ME, Fuller R. 1977. The genotobioticanimal in the study of gut microbiology. In: Clarke RTJ, Bauchop T, editors. Microbial ecology of the gut. London: AcademicPress. p. 311-346.
23. Cufadar Y, Yildiz AÖ, Olgun O. 2010. Effects of xylanase enzyme supplementation to corn/wheat-based diets on performance and egg quality in laying hens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 90:207-212.
24. Davis P 1976. Single cell protein. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Academic Press
25. Davis GS, Qureshi ME. 1997. PrimaLacaffec ts immune function of Bobwhite quail. Wildlife Harvest 28:54-56.
26. Dipeolu MAI, Eruvbetine D, Oguntona EB, Bankole OO, Sowunmi KS. 2005. Comparison of effects of antibiotics and enzyme inclusion in diets of laying birds. Archivos de Zootecnia 54:3-11.
27. Elkin RG, Rogler JC. 1990. Reduction of the cholesterol content of eggs by the oral administration of lovastatin to laying hens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 38:1635-1641.
28. Fairchild AS, Grimes JL, Jones FT, Wineland MJ, Edens FW, Sefton AE. 2001. Effects of hen age, Bio-Mos® and Flavomycin® on poult susceptibility to oral Escherichia coli challenge. Poultry Science 80:562-571.
29. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. 1972. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical Chemistry 18:499-502.
30. Fukushima M, Nakano M. 1995. The effect of a probiotic on faecal and liver lipid classes in rats. British Journal of Nutrition 73:701-710.
31. Fuller R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 66:365-378.
32. Gao F, Jiang Y, Zhou GH, Han ZK. 2007. The effects of xylanase supplementation on growth, digestion, circulating hormone and metabolite levels, immunity and gut microflora in cockerels fed on wheat-based diets. British Poultry Science 48(4):480-488.
33. Gardiner GE, Casey PG, Casey G, Lynch PB, Lawlor PG, Hill C, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C, Ross RP. 2004. Relative ability of orally administered Lactobacillus murinus to predominate and persist in the porcine gastrointestinal tract. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70:1895-1906.
34. Gilliland SE, Nelson CR, Maxwell C. 1985. Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 49:377-381.
35. Gross WB, Sigel HS. 1986. Effects of initial and second periods of fasting on heterophil/lymphocyte ratios and body weight. Avian Diseases 30:345-346.
36. Haddadin MS, Abdulrahim SM, Hashlamoun EA, Robinson RK. 1996. The effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the production and chemical composition of hen’s eggs. Poultry Science 75:491-494.
37. Hamilton RMG. 1982. Methods and factors that affect the measurement of eggshell quality. Poultry Science 61:2022-2039.
38. Hempe JM, Laukxen RC, Savage JE. 1988. Rapid determination of egg weight and specific gravity using a computerized data collection system. Poultry Science 67:902-907.
39. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. 1998. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations and serum cholesterol of broilers diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science 77:1259-1265.
40. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Ali AM, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. 1996. Effect of adherent Lactobacillus spp. on in vitro adherence of salmonellae to the intestinal epithelial cells of chickens. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 81:201-206.
41. Kabir SML, Rahman MM, Rahman MB, Rahman MM, Ahmed SU. 2004. The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science 3:361-364.
42. Karimi A, Scott TA, Bedford MR 2000. Effect of feed processing, enzyme level and antibiotic supplementation in wheat-based diets on AME of diet, growth and gut development of broilers. Poultry Science Association 89th Annual Meeting; 2000 August; Montreal, Quebec. Poultry Science 79(Suppl. 1): Abstract # 84 p. 20.
43. Laegreid WW, Bauer N. 2004. Probiotics for pathogen control in poultry and livestock. American Meat Science Association Conference held in New york Reciprocal Proceedings.
44. Leske KL, Coon CN. 1999. A bioassay to determine the effect of phytase on phytate phosphorus hydrolysis and total phosphorus retention of feed ingredients as determined with broilers and laying hens. Poultry Science 78:1151-1157.
45. Lim HS, Namkung H, Paik IK. 2003. Effects of phytase supplementation on the performance, egg quality and phosphorus excretion of laying hens fed different levels of dietary calcium and nonphytate phosphorus. Poultry Science 82:92-99.
46. Makled MN 1991. The potentials of probiotics in poultry feeds. A review. Proceeding 3rd Scientific Symposium for Animal, Poultry and Fish Nutrition (II), 54-68 Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.
47. Mandal L, Mandal SK, Baidya N, Sarkar SK. 2000. Pro and antibiotic sequence performance in broiler diet. Feed Mix 8:18-20.
48. Maxwell MH, Robertson GW. 1998. The avian heterophil leucocyte: a review. World’s Poultry Science Journal 54:155-178.
49. Mehri M, Adibmoradi M, Samie A, Shivazad M. 2010. Effects of ß-Mannanase on broiler performance, gut morphology and immune system. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(37):6221-6228.
50. Miles RD. 1993. Manipulation of the microflora of the gastrointestinal tract: natural ways to prevent colonization by pathogens. In: Lyons TP, editor Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Proceedings of Alltech’s Ninth Annual Symposium. Nicholasville, KY, USA: Alltech Technical Publications. p. 133-150.
51. Mohammed KhA, Toson MA, Hassanien HHM, Soliman MAH, Sanaa HMEl-Nagar. 2010. Effects of phytase supplementation on performance and egg quality of laying hens fed diets containing rice bran. Egypt Poultry Science 30(3):649-659.
52. Mohan B, Kadirvel R, Bhaskaran M, Natarajan A. 1995. Effect of probiotic supplementation on serum/yolk cholesterol and on eggshell thickness in layers. British Poultry Science 36:799-803.
53. Nahashon SN, Nakne HS, Mirosh LW. 1994. Production variables and nutrient retention in single comb white leghorn laying pullets fed diets supplemented with direct-fed microbial. Poultry Science 73:1699-1711.
54. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW. 1996. Performance of single comb white leghorn fed a diet supplemented with a live microbial during the growth and egg laying phases. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57:25-38.
55. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev edn National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
56. Nesheim MC, Austic RE, Card IE. 1979. Poultry production. 12th ed. Malvern, PA: Lea and Febiger.
57. Pan DF, Igbasan FA, Guenter W, Marquardt RR. 1998. The effects of enzyme and inorganic phosphorus supplements in wheat and rye based diets on laying hen performance, energy and phosphorus availability. Poultry Science 77:83-89.
58. Panda AK, Rama Rao SV, Raju MVLN, Bhanja SK. 2005. Effect of microbial phytase on production performance of white leghorn layers fed on a diet low in non-phytate phosphorus. British Poultry Science 46:464-469.
59. Patterson JA, Burkholder KM. 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production (Review). Poultry Science 82:627-631.
60. Pedroso AA, Moraes VMB, Arik J. 1999. Effect of proteins and probioticlevel in pullet and laying hen diets. Brazilian Poultry Science 1(1):49-54.
61. Roberts JR 2003. Effects of commercial feed enzymes in wheat-based diets on egg and egg shell quality in imported strains of laying hen. In: Farrell DJ, editor, Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney 11. p. 139-142.
62. Rolfe RD. 2000. The role of probioticc ultures in the control of gastrointestinal health. Journal of Nutrition 130:396S-402S.
63. Saarela M, Mogensen G, Fonden R, Matto J, Mattila- Sandholm T. 2000. Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. Journal of Biotechnology 84:197-215.
64. Salem AA, El-Anwer EMM, Abo-Eita EMM, Namra MMM. 2008. Productive and physiological performance of golden montazah male chickens as affected by feed restriction and Avizyme supplementation. Egypt Poultry Science 28(4):1137-1164.
65. Salianeha N, Shirzadb MR, Seifi S. 2011. Performance and antibody response of broiler chickens fed diets containing probioticand prebiotic. Journal of Applied Animal Research 39(1):65-67.
66. Schneitz C. 2005. Competitive exclusion in poultry-30 years of research. Food Control 16:657-667.
67. Scott TA, Kampen R, Silversides FG. 2001. The effect of phytase in nutrient-reduced corn- and wheat-based diets fed to two strains of laying hen. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81:393-401.
68. Selle PH, Ravindran V, Ravindran G, Bryden WL. 2007. Effects of dietary lysine and microbial phytase on growth performance and nutrient utilisation of broiler chickens. Asian-Australasain Journal of Animal Sciences 20(7):1100-1107.
69. Shehata AAM. 2000. Using some Aquaticplants in feeding chicks [PhD thesis]. Egypt: Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University.
70. Silversides FG, Scott TA, Bedford MR. 2004. The effect of microbial species used for phytase expression on activity for broiler performance and nutrient digestibility. Poultry Science 83:985-989.
71. Sissons JW 1988. The potential of probioticorganisms to prevent diarrhea and promote digestion. Proceeding 4th International Seminar, Poland. p. 457-470.
72. Smits CHM, Veldman A, Verkade HJ, Beynen AC. 1998. The inhibitory effect of carboxymethylcellulose with high viscosity on lipid absorption in broiler chickens coincides with reduced bile salt concentration and raised microbial numbers in the small intestine. Poultry Science 77:1534-1539.
73. Sohail SS, Bryant AC, Roland Sr DA, Apajalahti JHA, Pierson EM. 2003. Influence of Avizyme 1500 on performance of commercial Leghorns. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 12:284-290.
74. Somogyi M. 1960. Modification of two methods for the assay of amylase. Clinical Chemistry 6:23-35.
75. St-Onge MP, Farnworth ER, Jones PJH. 2000. Consumption of fermented and nonfermented dairy products: effects on cholesterol concentrations and metabolism. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 71:674-681.
76. Steel RGD, Torrie JH 1984. Principles and procedures of statistics. International Student ed. Tokyo, Japan: McGraw Hill.
77. Svihus B, Edvardsen DH, Bedford MR, Gullord M. 2000. Effect of methods of analysis and heat treatment on viscosity of wheat, barley and oats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 88:1-12.
78. Thayer SG, Beard CW. 1998. Serological procedure. A laboratory manual for the isolation and identification of avian pathogens. 4th edn. Pennsylvania, PA: American Association of Avian Pathologist. p. 255-258.
79. Thayer RH, Burkitt RF, Morrison RD, Murray EE. 1978. Efficiency of utilization of dietary phosphorus by caged turkey breeder hens fed ration supplemented with live yeast culture. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University. Animal Science Research Report, MP-103.
80. Timmerman HM, Koning CJM, Mulder L, Rombouts FM, Beynen AC. 2004. Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics - a comparison of functionality andefficacy. International Journal of Food Microbiology 96:219-233.
81. Tollba AAH, Mahmoud RM. 2009. How to control the broiler pathogenicintestinal flora under normal or heat stress conditions. 1-Medical plant-Probiotics-Sand as a litter. Egypt Poultry Science 29(2):565-587.
82. Van Leeuwen P, Verdonck JMAJ, Wagenaars CMF, Kwakernaak C 2005. The effect of three inulin preparations on performance before and after an inoculation with Salmonella and Campylobacter in broilers. Animal Sciences Group Wagingen UR, Lelystad, Netherlands, Project nr 825.20552.03. Report No: 05/ l00651:1-40.
83. Vukis-Vranjes M, Wenk C. 1995. Influence of dietary enzyme complex on broiler performance in diets with and without antibioticsupplementation. British Poultry Science 36:265-275.
84. Waldroup PW, Greene DE, Luther LW, Jones BD. 1972. Response of turkey breeder hens to Vigofacand Fermacto supplementation. Poultry Science 51:510 513.
85. Wu G, Bryant MM, Voitle RA, Roland Sr DA. 2005. Effects of beta-mannanase in corn-soy diets on commercial leghorns in second-cycle hens. Poultry Science 84:894-897.
86. Yannakopoulos AL, Tserveni-Gousi AS. 1986. Quality characteristics of quail eggs. British Poultry Science 27:171-176.
87. Yeo J, Kim K. 1997. Effect of feeding diets containing an antibiotic, a probiotic, or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poultry Science 76:381-385.
88. Yörü k MA, Gül M, Hayirli A, Macit M. 2004. The effects of supplementation of humate and probioticon egg production and quality parameters during the late laying period in hens. Poultry Science 83:84-88.
89. Zamora V, Figueroa JL, Reyna L, Cordero JL, Sánchez- Torres MT, Martínez M. 2011. Growth performance, carcass characteristics and plasma urea nitrogen concentration of nursery pigs fed low-protein diets supplemented with glucomannans or protease. Journal of Applied Animal Research 39(1):53-56.