Deprivation-related and use-dependent plasticity go hand in hand

eLife

Volumn 2, Issue November2013, 2013, Pages 1-15

  Makin, Tamar R ^a   Cramer, Alona O ^a   Scholz, Jan ^a,b   Hahamy, Avital ^c   Slater, David Henderson ^d   Tracey, Irene ^a   Johansen Berg, Heidi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^c WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^d OXFORD CENTRE FOR ENABLEMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND MALFORMATION; HUMAN; LIMB AMPUTATION; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PHANTOM PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SPINAL CORD LESION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84991556212     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01273     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baseler HA, Gouws A, Haak KV, Racey C, Crossland MD, Tufail A, et al. 2011. Large-scale remapping of visual cortex is absent in adult humans with macular degeneration. Nat Neurosci 14: 649-55. doi: 10. 1038/nn. 2793.
2. Bogdanov S, Smith J, Frey SH. 2012. Former hand territory activity increases after amputation during intact hand movements, but is unaffected by illusory visual feedback. Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10. 1177/1545968311429687.
3. Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF, et al. 2007. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med 357: 2206-7. doi: 10. 1056/NEJMc071927.
4. Draganski B, Moser T, Lummel N, Gänssbauer S, Bogdahn U, Haas F, et al. 2006. Decrease of thalamic gray matter following limb amputation. NeuroImage 31: 951-7. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2006. 01. 018.
5. Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, et al. 1995. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 375: 482-4. doi: 10. 1038/375482a0.
6. Friston KJ, Fletcher P, Josephs O, Holmes A, Rugg MD, Turner R. 1998. Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. NeuroImage 7: 30-40. doi: 10. 1006/nimg. 1997. 0306.
7. Greve DN, Fischl B. 2009. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. NeuroImage 48: 63-72. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2009. 06. 060.
8. Jang CH, Yang HS, Yang HE, Lee SY, Kwon JW, Yun BD, et al. 2011. A survey on activities of daily living and occupations of upper extremity amputees. Ann Rehabil Med 35: 907-21. doi: 10. 5535/arm. 2011. 35. 6. 907.
9. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. 2002. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 17: 825-41. doi: 10. 1006/nimg. 2002. 1132.
10. Jones LE, Davidson JH. 1999. Save that arm: a study of problems in the remaining arm of unilateral upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 23: 55-8. doi: 10. 3109/03093649909071611.
11. Koenig A, Luft A, Cajigas I. 2013. Guest editorial: from neuroscience to neuro-rehabilitation: transferring basic neuroscientific principles from laboratory to bedside. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10: 6. doi: 10. 1186/1743-0003-10-6.
12. Krakauer JW. 2006. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 19: 84-90. doi: 10. 1097/01. wco. 0000200544. 29915. cc.
13. Kuiken TA, Li G, Lock BA, Lipschutz RD, Miller LA, Stubblefield KA, et al. 2009. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA 301: 619-28. doi: 10. 1001/jama. 2009. 116.
14. Langer N, Hänggi J, Müller NA, Simmen HP, Jäncke L. 2012. Effects of limb immobilization on brain plasticity. Neurology 78: 182-8. doi: 10. 1212/WNL. 0b013e31823fcd9c.
15. Lindner HYN, Nätterlund BS, Hermansson LMN. 2010. Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures: review and content comparison based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Prosthet Orthot Int 34: 109-28. doi: 10. 3109/03093641003776976.
16. Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N, Erb M, Huse E, Flor H. 1999. Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nat Neurosci 2: 501-2. doi: 10. 1038/9145.
17. Makin TR, Scholz J, Filippini N, Henderson Slater D, Tracey I, Johansen-Berg H. 2013. Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area. Nat Commun 4: 1570. doi: 10. 1038/ncomms2571.
18. Makin TR, Wilf M, Schwartz I, Zohary E. 2010. Amputees "neglect" the space near their missing hand. Psychol Sci 21: 55-57. doi: 10. 1177/09567976093547396.
19. Migliaccio R, Agosta F, Toba MN, Samri D, Corlier F, de Souza LC, et al. 2012. Brain networks in posterior cortical atrophy: a single case tractography study and literature review. CORTEX 48: 1298-309. doi: 10. 1016/j. cortex. 2011. 10. 002.
20. Nava E, Röder B. 2011. Adaptation and maladaptation insights from brain plasticity. Prog Brain Res 191: 177-94. doi: 10. 1016/B978-0-444-53752-2. 00005-9.
21. Nimhurchadha S, Gallagher P, Maclachlan M, Wegener ST. 2013. Identifying successful outcomes and important factors to consider in upper limb amputation rehabilitation: an international web-based Delphi survey. Disabil Rehabil doi: 10. 3109/09638288. 2012. 751138.
22. Østlie K, Lesjø IM, Franklin RJ, Garfelt B, Skjeldal OH, Magnus P. 2012. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a group-based survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 7: 294-303. doi: 10. 3109/17483107. 2011. 635405.
23. Raffin E, Mattout J, Reilly KT, Giraux P. 2012. Disentangling motor execution from motor imagery with the phantom limb. Brain 135: 582-95. doi: 10. 1093/brain/awr337.
24. Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. 2009. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain 132: 1693-710. doi: 10. 1093/brain/awp135.
25. Reilly KT, Mercier C, Schieber MH, Sirigu A. 2006. Persistent hand motor commands in the amputees' brain. Brain 129: 2211-23. doi: 10. 1093/brain/awl154.
26. Scholz J, Klein MC, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H. 2009. Training induces changes in white-matter architecture. Nat Neurosci 12: 1370-1. doi: 10. 1038/nn. 2412.
27. Shambes GM, Gibson JM, Welker W. 1978. Fractured somatotopy in granule cell tactile areas of rat cerebellar hemispheres revealed by micromapping. Brain Behav Evol 15: 94-140. doi: 10. 1159/000123774.
28. Simões EL, Bramati I, Rodrigues E, Franzoi A, Moll J, Lent R, et al. 2012. Functional expansion of sensorimotor representation and structural reorganization of callosal connections in lower limb amputees. J Neurosci 32: 3211-20. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4592-11. 2012.
29. Smith SM. 2002. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17: 143-55. doi: 10. 1002/hbm. 10062.
30. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al. 2006. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage 31: 1487-505. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2006. 02. 024.
31. Smurr LM, Gulick K, Yancosek K, Ganz O. 2008. Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success. J Hand Ther 21: 160-75; quiz 176. doi: 10. 1197/j. jht. 2007. 09. 006.
32. Stoeckel MC, Seitz RJ, Buetefisch CM. 2009. Congenitally altered motor experience alters somatotopic organization of human primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 2395-400. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0803733106.
33. Urbanski M, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. 2008. Brain networks of spatial awareness: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging tractography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 79: 598-601. doi: 10. 1136/jnnp. 2007. 126276.
34. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. 2006. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 67: 1189-94. doi: 10. 1212/01. wnl. 0000238164. 90657. c2.
35. Werhahn KJ, Mortensen J, Kaelin-Lang A, Boroojerdi B, Cohen LG. 2002. Cortical excitability changes induced by deafferentation of the contralateral hemisphere. Brain 125: 1402-13. doi: 10. 1093/brain/awf140.