Disentangling motor execution from motor imagery with the phantom limb

Brain

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 582-595

  Raffin, Estelle ^a,b   Mattout, Jérémie ^b,c   Reilly, Karen T ^b,c   Giraux, Pascal ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^b LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

brain imaging; connectivity; motor execution; motor imagery; phantom limb

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGNOSIA; ARM AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; CEREBELLUM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHANTOM PAIN; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84857204099     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr337     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Bakker M, Overeem S, Snijders AH, Borm G, van Elswijk G, Toni I, et al. Motor imagery of foot dorsiflexion and gait: effects on corticospinal excitability. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 2519-27.
2. Beaumont G, Mercier C, Michon PE, Malouin F, Jackson PL. Decreasing phantom limb pain through observation of action and imagery: a case series. Pain Med 2011; 12: 289-99.
3. Berman BD, Horovitz SG, Venkataraman G, Hallett M. Self-modulation of primary motor cortex activity with motor and motor imagery tasks using real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 917-25.
4. Brett M, Anton JL, Valabregure R, Poline JB. Region of interest analysis using SPM toolbox. In: 8th International Conferance on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain Sendai, Japan. NeuroImage 2002.
5. Ceballos-Baumann AO, Passingham RE, Marsden CD, Brooks DJ. Motor reorganization in acquired hemidystonia. Ann Neurol 1995; 37: 746-57.
6. Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF, et al. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2206-7. (Pubitemid 350146133)
7. Chen H, Yang Q, Liao W, Gong Q, Shen S. Evaluation of the effective connectivity of supplementary motor areas during motor imagery using Granger causality mapping. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 1844-53.
8. Conson M, Sacco S, Sara M, Pistoia F, Grossi D, Trojano L. Selective motor imagery defect in patients with locked-in syndrome. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 2622-8.
9. Coslett HB, Medina J, Kliot D, Burkey AR. Mental motor imagery indexes pain: the hand laterality task. Eur J Pain 2010; 14: 1007-13.
10. Decety J, Perani D, Jeannerod M, Bettinardi V, Tadary B, Woods R, et al. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature 1994; 371: 600-2. (Pubitemid 24315739)
11. Dechent P, Merboldt KD, Frahm J. Is the human primary motor cortex involved in motor imagery? Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004; 19: 138-44. (Pubitemid 38328747)
12. Deiber MP, Passingham RE, Colebatch JG, Friston KJ, Nixon PD, Frackowiak RS. Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography. Exp Brain Res 1991; 84: 393-402.
13. Diers M, Christmann C, Koeppe C, Ruf M, Flor H. Mirrored, imagined and executed movements differentially activate sensorimotor cortex in amputees with and without phantom limb pain. Pain 2010; 149: 296-304.
14. Eickhoff SB, Dafotakis M, Grefkes C, Shah NJ, Zilles K, Piza-Katzer H. Central adaptation following heterotopic hand replantation probed by fMRI and effective connectivity analysis. Exp Neurol 2008; 212: 132-44.
15. Ersland L, Rosen G, Lundervold A, Smievoll AI, Tillung T, Sundberg H, et al. Phantom limb imaginary fingertapping causes primary motor cortex activation: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 1996; 8: 207-10. (Pubitemid 126785560)
16. Fiorio M, Tinazzi M, Ionta S, Fiaschi A, Moretto G, Edwards MJ, et al. Mental rotation of body parts and non-corporeal objects in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 2346-54. (Pubitemid 46678093)
17. Fourkas AD, Avenanti A, Urgesi C, Aglioti SM. Corticospinal facilitation during first and third person imagery. Exp Brain Res 2006; 168: 143-51. (Pubitemid 41752819)
18. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1273-302. (Pubitemid 37025831)
19. Gagné M, Reilly KT, Hetu S, Mercier C. Motor control over the phantom limb in above-elbow amputees and its relationship with phantom limb pain. Neuroscience 2009; 162: 78-86.
20. Gao Q, Duan X, Chen H. Evaluation of effective connectivity of motor areas during motor imagery and execution using conditional Granger causality. Neuroimage 2011; 54: 1280-8.
21. Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehericy S, Poline JB, Gaymard B, Marsault C, et al. Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10: 1093-104.
22. Gieteling EW, van Rijn MA, de Jong BM, Hoogduin JM, Renken R, van Hilten JJ, et al. Cerebral activation during motor imagery in complex regional pain syndrome type 1 with dystonia. Pain 2008; 134: 302-9.
23. Giraux P, Sirigu A. Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity. Neuroimage 2003; 20 (Suppl 1): S107-11. (Pubitemid 37338784)
24. Grafton ST, Arbib MA, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination. Exp Brain Res 1996; 112: 103-11. (Pubitemid 26388592)
25. Grafton ST, Mazziotta JC, Woods RP, Phelps ME. Human functional anatomy of visually guided finger movements. Brain 1992; 115 (Pt 2): 565-87.
26. Guillot A, Collet C, Nguyen VA, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J. Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 2157-72.
27. Hanakawa T, Dimyan MA, Hallett M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. Cereb Cortex 2008; 18: 2775-88.
28. Hanakawa T, Immisch I, Toma K, Dimyan MA, Van Gelderen P, Hallett M. Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. J Neurophysiol 2003; 89: 989-1002. (Pubitemid 36206146)
29. Helmich RC, de Lange FP, Bloem BR, Toni I. Cerebral compensation during motor imagery in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 2201-15. (Pubitemid 46678107)
30. Hotz-Boendermaker S, Funk M, Summers P, Brugger P, Hepp-Reymond MC, Curt A, Kollias SS. Preservation of motor programs in paraplegics as demonstrated by attempted and imagined foot movements. Neuroimage 2008; 39: 383-94. (Pubitemid 350102195)
31. Huang YZ, Rothwell JC, Lu CS, Wang J, Chen RS. Restoration of motor inhibition through an abnormal premotor-motor connection in dystonia. Mov Disord 2010; 25: 696-703.
32. Hugdahl K, Rosen G, Ersland L, Lundervold A, Smievoll AI, Barndon R, et al. Common pathways in mental imagery and pain perception: an fMRI study of a subject with an amputated arm. Scand J Psychol 2001; 42: 269-75. (Pubitemid 33668478)
33. Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain 1983; 17: 243-56. (Pubitemid 14201149)
34. Johnson SH. Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 729-32. (Pubitemid 30173913)
35. Karl A, Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Cohen LG, Flor H. Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity amputees with phantom limb pain. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 3609-18. (Pubitemid 32422825)
36. Karl A, Muhlnickel W, Kurth R, Flor H. Neuroelectric source imaging of steady-state movement-related cortical potentials in human upper extremity amputees with and without phantom limb pain. Pain 2004; 110: 90-102. (Pubitemid 38953272)
37. Kasess CH, Stephan KE, Weissenbacher A, Pezawas L, Moser E, Windischberger C. Multi-subject analyses with dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 3065-74.
38. Kasess CH, Windischberger C, Cunnington R, Lanzenberger R, Pezawas L, Moser E. The suppressive influence of SMA on M1 in motor imagery revealed by fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 2008; 40: 828-37.
39. Kiebel SJ, Garrido MI, Friston KJ. Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses: the role of intrinsic connections. Neuroimage 2007; 36: 332-45. (Pubitemid 46710451)
40. Koch G, Franca M, Del Olmo MF, Cheeran B, Milton R, Alvarez Sauco M, et al. Time course of functional connectivity between dorsal premotor and contralateral motor cortex during movement selection. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 7452-9. (Pubitemid 44315214)
41. Kosslyn SM, Pascual-Leone A, Felician O, Camposano S, Keenan JP, Thompson WL, et al. The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. Science 1999; 284: 167-70. (Pubitemid 29282074)
42. Kumru H, Soto O, Casanova J, Valls-Sole J. Motor cortex excitability changes during imagery of simple reaction time. Exp Brain Res 2008; 189: 373-8.
43. Lacourse MG, Orr EL, Cramer SC, Cohen MJ. Brain activation during execution and motor imagery of novel and skilled sequential hand movements. Neuroimage 2005; 27: 505-19. (Pubitemid 41139923)
44. Lancaster JL, Rainey LH, Summerlin JL, Freitas CS, Fox PT, Evans AC, et al. Automated labeling of the human brain: a preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method. Hum Brain Mapp 1997; 5: 238-42. (Pubitemid 27375521)
45. Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, Liotti M, Freitas CS, Rainey L, et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 10: 120-31. (Pubitemid 30456920)
46. Levy R, Deer TR, Henderson J. Intracranial neurostimulation for pain control: a review. Pain Phys 2010; 13: 157-65.
47. Lorey B, Pilgramm S, Bischoff M, Stark R, Vaitl D, Kindermann S, et al. Activation of the parieto-premotor network is associated with vivid motor imagery-a parametric FMRI study. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e20368.
48. Lotze M, Flor H, Grodd W, Larbig W, Birbaumer N. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain 2001; 124 (Pt 11): 2268-77. (Pubitemid 33055370)
49. Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N, Erb M, Huse E, Flor H. Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nat Neurosci 1999a; 2: 501-2. (Pubitemid 30491228)
50. Lotze M, Montoya P, Erb M, Hulsmann E, Flor H, Klose U, et al. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 1999b; 11: 491-501. (Pubitemid 29520541)
51. Maarrawi J, Peyron R, Mertens P, Costes N, Magnin M, Sindou M, et al. Motor cortex stimulation for pain control induces changes in the endogenous opioid system. Neurology 2007; 69: 827-34. (Pubitemid 47329581)
52. MacIver K, Lloyd DM, Kelly S, Roberts N, Nurmikko T. Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain 2008; 131 (Pt 8): 2181-91.
53. Maihofner C, Baron R, DeCol R, Binder A, Birklein F, Deuschl G, et al. The motor system shows adaptive changes in complex regional pain syndrome. Brain 2007; 130 (Pt 10): 2671-87. (Pubitemid 47511699)
54. Maihofner C, Handwerker HO, Neundorfer B, Birklein F. Patterns of cortical reorganization in complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 2003; 61: 1707-15. (Pubitemid 38020816)
55. McAvinue LP, Robertson IH. Individual differences in response to phantom limb movement therapy. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 2186-95.
56. Meister IG, Krings T, Foltys H, Boroojerdi B, Muller M, Topper R, et al. Playing piano in the mind-an fMRI study on music imagery and performance in pianists. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004; 19: 219-28. (Pubitemid 38520017)
57. Melzack R. Phantom limbs. Sci Am 1992; 266: 120-6.
58. Mercier C, Reilly KT, Vargas CD, Aballea A, Sirigu A. Mapping phantom movement representations in the motor cortex of amputees. Brain 2006; 129 (Pt 8): 2202-10. (Pubitemid 44289082)
59. Mercier C, Sirigu A. Training with virtual visual feedback to alleviate phantom limb pain. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 587-94.
60. Mitchell WS. Injurries of nerves and their consequences. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1872.
61. Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2006; 67: 2129-34. (Pubitemid 46035463)
62. Murray CD, Pettifer S, Howard T, Patchick EL, Caillette F, Kulkarni J, et al. The treatment of phantom limb pain using immersive virtual reality: three case studies. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1465-9. (Pubitemid 47343376)
63. Nair DG, Purcott KL, Fuchs A, Steinberg F, Kelso JA. Cortical and cerebellar activity of the human brain during imagined and executed unimanual and bimanual action sequences: a functional MRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003; 15: 250-60. (Pubitemid 36084371)
64. Naito E, Kochiyama T, Kitada R, Nakamura S, Matsumura M, Yonekura Y, et al. Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 3683-91. (Pubitemid 37465773)
65. O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain in adults (Protocol). A report of a Cochrane systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2011; 47: 309-26.
66. Pelgrims B, Michaux N, Olivier E, Andres M. Contribution of the primary motor cortex to motor imagery: A subthreshold TMS study. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32: 1471-82.
67. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Daunizeau J, Rosa MJ, Friston KJ, Schofield TM, et al. Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput Biol 2010; 6: e1000709.
68. Playford ED, Passingham RE, Marsden CD, Brooks DJ. Increased activation of frontal areas during arm movement in idiopathic torsion dystonia. Mov Disord 1998; 13: 309-18. (Pubitemid 28127808)
69. Porro CA, Francescato MP, Cettolo V, Diamond ME, Baraldi P, Zuiani C, et al. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 7688-98. (Pubitemid 26389708)
70. Raffin E, Giraux P, Reilly KT. The moving phantom: motor execution or motor imagery? Cortex 2011. Advance Access published on February 12, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.003.
71. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain 1998; 121 (Pt 9): 1603-30. (Pubitemid 28420738)
72. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci 1996; 263: 377-86. (Pubitemid 26146167)
73. Roland PE, Larsen B, Lassen NA, Skinhoj E. Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man. J Neurophysiol 1980; 43: 118-36. (Pubitemid 10128393)
74. Romero DH, Lacourse MG, Lawrence KE, Schandler S, Cohen MJ. Event-related potentials as a function of movement parameter variations during motor imagery and isometric action. Behav Brain Res 2000; 117: 83-96.
75. Roosink M, Zijdewind I. Corticospinal excitability during observation and imagery of simple and complex hand tasks: implications for motor rehabilitation. Behav Brain Res 2010; 213: 35-41.
76. Rosen G, Hugdahl K, Ersland L, Lundervold A, Smievoll AI, Barndon R, et al. Different brain areas activated during imagery of painful and non-painful 'finger movements' in a subject with an amputated arm. Neurocase 2001; 7: 255-60. (Pubitemid 32761776)
77. Roth M, Decety J, Raybaudi M, Massarelli R, Delon-Martin C, Segebarth C, et al. Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroreport 1996; 7: 1280-4. (Pubitemid 26231600)
78. Roux FE, Ibarrola D, Lazorthes Y, Berry I. Virtual movements activate primary sensorimotor areas in amputees: report of three cases. Neurosurgery 2001; 49: 736-41; discussion 41-2.
79. Roux FE, Lotterie JA, Cassol E, Lazorthes Y, Sol JC, Berry I. Cortical areas involved in virtual movement of phantom limbs: comparison with normal subjects. Neurosurgery 2003; 53: 1342-52; discussion 52-3.
80. Saitoh Y, Yoshimine T. Stimulation of primary motor cortex for intractable deafferentation pain. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007; 97 (Pt 2): 51-6.
81. Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Chen EE, Small SL. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14: 1246-55. (Pubitemid 39391202)
82. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Daunizeau J, Moran RJ, Friston KJ. Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage 2009; 46: 1004-17.
83. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Moran RJ, den Ouden HE, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ. Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 3099-109.
84. Stephan KM, Fink GR, Passingham RE, Silbersweig D, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Frith CD, et al. Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 373-86.
85. Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Steyvers M, Levin O, Swinnen SP. Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res 2006; 168: 157-64. (Pubitemid 41752821)
86. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 273-89. (Pubitemid 34852226)
87. Winstein CJ, Grafton ST, Pohl PS. Motor task difficulty and brain activity: investigation of goal-directed reciprocal aiming using positron emission tomography. J Neurophysiol 1997; 77: 1581-94. (Pubitemid 27137049)