Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures: Review and content comparison based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Prosthetics and Orthotics International

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 109-128

  Lindner, Helen Y N ^a   Nätterlund, Birgitta Sjöqvist ^b   Hermansson, Liselotte M Norling ^b  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Outcome measures; Prosthetics; Upper limb; Upper limb prosthetics

Indexed keywords

ARM PROSTHESIS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; DATA EXTRACTION; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SOCIAL STATUS; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMPUTEES; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; CHILD; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77952471108     PISSN: 03093646     EISSN: 17461553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03093641003776976     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Davids JR, Wagner LV, Meyer LC, Blackhurst DW. Prosthetic management of children with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(6):1294-1300.
2. Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(1):60-63.
3. Kuyper MA, Breedijk M, Mulders AH, Post MW, Prevo AJ. Prosthetic management of children in The Netherlands with upper limb deficiencies. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001;25(3):228-234.
4. Davidson J. A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. J Hand Ther 2002;15(1):62-70.
5. Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, Mackenzie EJ, Ephraim P, Rossbach P. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(5):723-729.
6. Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency - acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(2):172-177.
7. Bhaskaranand K, Bhat AK, Acharya KN. Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003;123(7):363-366.
8. Dromerick AW, Schabowsky CN, Holley RJ, Monroe B, Markotic A, Lum PS. Effect of training on upperextremity prosthetic performance and motor learning: A single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1199-1204.
9. Lake C. Effects of prosthetic training on upper-extremity prosthesis use. JPO 1997;9(1):3-9. (Pubitemid 127543592)
10. Egermann M, Thomsen M. Myoelectric prostheses for kindergarten age children. Analysis of first reactions and experiences. Orthopade 2003;32(2):164-169.
11. Wright FV. Measurement of functional outcome with individuals who use upper extremity prosthetic devices: Current and future directions. JPO 2006;18(2):46-56.
12. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31(3):236-257.
13. Wright FV. Prosthetic outcome measures for use with upper limb amputees: A systematic review of the peerreviewed literature, 1970 to 2009. JPO 2009;21(9):3-63.
14. Hill W, Stavdahl O, Hermansson LN, Kyberd P, Swanson S, Hubbard S. Functional Outcomes in the WHO-ICF Model: Establishment of the Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures Group. JPO 2009;21(2):115-119.
15. Hobart J. Rating scales for neurologists. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74(Suppl. 4):iv22-iv6.
16. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
17. Law M, MacDermid J. Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Slack incorporated; 2008.
18. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
19. Metcalf C, Adams J, Burridge J, Yule V, Chappell P. A review of clinical upper limb assessments within the framework of the WHO ICF. Musculoskelet Care 2007;5(3):160-173.
20. Oltman R, Neises G, Scheible D, Mehrtens G, Gruneberg C. ICF components of corresponding outcome measures in flexor tendon rehabilitation - a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:139.
21. Stucki A, Cieza A, Schuurmans MM, Ustun B, Stucki G, Gradinger F, et al. Content comparison of healthrelated quality of life instruments for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med 2008;9(2):199-206.
22. Light CM, Chappell PH, Kyberd PJ. Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: Normative data, reliability, and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(6):776-783.
23. Buffart LM, Roebroeck ME, Pesch-Batenburg JM, Janssen WG, Stam HJ. Assessment of arm/hand functioning in children with a congenital transverse or longitudinal reduction deficiency of the upper limb. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28(2):85-95.
24. Buffart LM, Roebroeck ME, van Heijningen VG, Pesch-Batenburg JM, Stam HJ. Evaluation of arm and prosthetic functioning in children with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency of the upper limb. J Rehabil Med 2007;39(5):379-386.
25. http://www.ahanetwork.se/aha-ongoing.php. Accessed 4 April 2010.
26. Hermansson LM, Bodin L, Eliasson AC. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the assessment of capacity for myoelectric control. J Rehabil Med 2006;38(2):118-123.
27. Hermansson LM, Fisher AG, Bernspang B, Eliasson AC. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: A new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control. J Rehabil Med 2005;37(3):166-171.
28. Lindner HYN, Linacre JM, Hermansson LM. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: Evaluation of construct and rating scale. J Rehabil Med 2009;41(6):467-474.
29. Hermansson LM, Lindner HYN. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control - training manual. Örebro, Sweden: Örebro University Hospital; 2008.
30. Pruitt SD, Seid M, Varni JW, Setoguchi Y. Toddlers with limb deficiency: conceptual basis and initial application of a functional status outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(7):819-824.
31. Pruitt SD, Varni JW, Seid M, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in limb deficiency: Development of an outcome measure for preschool children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79(4):405-411.
32. Pruitt SD, Varni JW, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in children with limb deficiency: Development and initial validation of an outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(12):1233-1238.
33. Pruitt SD, Varni JW, Seid M, Setoguchi Y. Prosthesis satisfaction outcome measurement in pediatric limb deficiency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78(7):750-754.
34. Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O'Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27(3):191-206.
35. Burger H, Franchignoni F, Heinemann AW, Kotnik S, Giordano A. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation. J Rehabil Med 2008;40(5):393-399.
36. Wright FV, Hubbard S, Jutai J, Naumann S. The Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index: Development and reliability testing of a new functional status questionnaire for children who use upper extremity prostheses. J Hand Ther 2001;14(2):91-104.
37. Wright FV, Hubbard S, Naumann S, Jutai J. Evaluation of the validity of the prosthetic upper extremity functional index for children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(4):518-527.
38. Wright FV. Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index - user manual. Bloorview MacMillan Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2001.
39. Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84(7):506-513.
40. Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales. Department of Psychology, Trinity College, Dublin; 2000.
41. Bagley AM, Molitor F, Wagner LV, Tomhave W, James MA. The Unilateral Below Elbow Test: A function test for children with unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48(7):569-575.
42. Sanderson E, Scott R. UNB test of prosthetic function: a test for unilateral amputees (test manual). Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, University of New Brunswick; 1985.
43. Hill W. UNB Test of Prosthetic Function - altered version. Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, University of New Brunswick; 2005.
44. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
45. Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84(9):719-723.
46. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005;85(3):257-268.
47. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 1st ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
48. De Gruijter DNM, Van der Kamp LJT. Statistical test theory for the behavioral sciences. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group; 2008.
49. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34(5):205-210.
50. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37(4):212-218.
51. Personal communication with Dr Cieza, the group leader of ICF core sets for chronic conditions; Apr. 2009.
52. Hill W, Stavdahl O, Hermansson LN, Kyberd P, Swanson S, Hubbard S. Upper limb prosthetic outcome measure (UPLOM): A working group and their findings. JPO 2009;21(9):69-82.
53. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985;39(6):386-391.
54. Stern EB. Stability of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test across three test sessions. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46(7):647-649.
55. Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Holmefur M, Kottorp A, Eliasson AC. The Assisting Hand Assessment: Current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007;49(4):259-264.
56. Kyberd P, Murgia A, Gasson M, Tjerks T, Metcalf C, Chappell P, Warwick K, Barnhill T. Case studies to demonstrate the range of applications of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure. Br J Occ Ther 2009;72(5):212-218.
57. Jakobsson U, Westergren A. Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data. Scand J Caring Sci 2005;19(4):427-431.
58. van Dijk-Koot, Carola A. van der Ham, Inez. Buffart, Laurien M. van der Sluis, Corry K. Stam, Henk J. Pesch-Batenburg, et al. Current experiences with the prosthetic upper extremity functional index in follow-up of children with upper limb reduction deficiency. JPO 2009;21(2):110-114.
59. Edelstein JE, Berger N. Performance comparison among children fitted with myoelectric and body-powered hands. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(4):376-380.
60. Bagley AM, Brasington K, Lutz C, McConnell S, Molitor F. Impact of prostheses on function and quality of life for children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(11):2356- 2365.
61. Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Positive meaning in amputation and thoughts about the amputated limb. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000;24(3):196-204.
62. Miller LA, Swanson S. Introduction to the Academy's State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures. JPO 2009;21(9):83-89.