The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 69, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 2431-2451

  Pettigrew, Corinne ^a   Martin, Randi C ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inhibition; Interference resolution; Shifting; Task switching; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ATTENTION; CUES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84991442257     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1121282     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. A.Allport, E.A.Styles, & S.Hsieh, (1994). Shifting intentional set:Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C.Umiltà & M.Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV:Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
2. A.Allport, & G.Wylie, (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S.Monsell & J.Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII:Control of cognitive processes (pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
3. E.M.Altmann, & W.D.Gray, (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602–639. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.602
4. A.D.Baddeley, (1986). Working memory. New York:Oxford University Press.
5. A.D.Baddeley, D.Chincotta, & A.Adlam, (2001). Working memory and the control of action:Evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 130, 641–657. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.641
6. D.Badre, & A.D.Wagner, (2006). Computational and neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility. PNAS, 103, 7186–7191. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509550103
7. M.Bao, Z.Li, X.Chen, & D.Zhang, (2006). Backward inhibition in a task of switching attention within verbal working memory. Brain Research Bulletin, 69, 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.12.007
8. R.L.Bryck, & U.Mayr, (2005). On the role of verbalization during task set selection:Switching or serial order control? Memory & Cognition, 33, 611–623. doi:10.3758/BF03195328
9. J.Cerella, (1990). Age and information processing rate. J.In E.Birren & K.W.Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 201–221). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
10. J.D.Cohen, B.MacWhinney, M.Flatt, & J.Provost, (1993). PsyScope:A new graphic interface environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(2), 257–271. doi:10.3758/BF03204507
11. R.E.Costa, & F.J.Friedrich, (2012). Inhibition, interference, and conflict in task switching. Psyconomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1193–1201. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0311-1
12. L.J.Cronbach, & L.Furby, (1970). How we should measure “change” – or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80. doi:10.1037/h0029382
13. R.De Jong, (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S.Monsell & J.Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII:Control of cognitive processes (pp. 357–376). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
14. K.H.Draheim, & R.Engle, (2014, November). Is there a relationship between task-switching and working memory capacity? Poster presented at the annual meeting of Psychonomic Society, Long Beach, California.
15. M.J.Emerson, & A.Miyake, (2003). The role of inner speech in task switching:A dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 148–168. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00511-9
16. B.A.Eriksen, & C.W.Eriksen, (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
17. M.E.Faust, D.A.Balota, D.H.Spieler, & F.R.Ferraro, (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount:Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777
18. M.F.Folstein, S.E.Folstein, P.R.McHugh, & G.Fanjiang, (2001). MMSE:Mini-mental state examination user's guide. Lutz, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
19. N.P.Friedman, & A.Miyake, (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions:A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 133, 101–135. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
20. M.Gade, & I.Koch, (2005). Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 530–534. doi:10.3758/BF03193800
21. M.Gade, & I.Koch, (2007). The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 35, 603–609. doi:10.3758/BF03193298
22. T.Goschke, (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S.Monsell & J.Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes:Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331–355). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
23. J.A.Grange, I.Juvina, & G.Houghton, (2013). On costs and benefits of n−2 repetitions in task switching:Towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition. Psychological Research, 77, 211–222. doi:10.1007/s00426-012-0421-4
24. A.C.Hamilton, & R.C.Martin, (2005). Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition:A single case study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 1–13. doi:10.3758/CABN.5.1.1
25. L.Hasher, & R.T.Zacks, (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging:A review and a new view. In G.H.Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
26. L.Hasher, R.T.Zacks, and C.P.May, (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D.Gopher & A.Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII:Cognitive regulation of performance:Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
27. G.Houghton, R.Pritchard, & J.A.Grange, (2009). The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 466–476. doi:10.1037/a0014648
28. M.M.Hughes, J.A.Linck, A.R.Bowles, J.T.Koeth, & M.F.Bunting, (2014). Alternatives to switch-cost scoring in the task-switching paradigm:Their reliability and increased validity. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 702–721. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0411-5
29. A.T.Jersild, (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 14. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1928-00322-001
30. K.Jost, W.De Baene, I.Koch, & M.Brass, (2013). A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 5–14. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000125
31. A.Kiesel, M.Steinhauser, M.Wendt, M.Falkenstein, K.Jost, A.M.Philipp, & I.Koch, (2010). Control and interference in task switching – A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. doi:10.1037/a0019842
32. I.Koch, M.Gade, S.Schuch, & A.M.Philipp, (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching:A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1–14. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
33. J.Kray, K.Z.H.Li, U.Lindenberger, (2002). Age-related changes in task-switching components:The role of task uncertainty. Brain and Cognition, 49, 363–381. doi:10.1006/brcg.2001.1505
34. J.Kray, & U.Lindenberger, (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15, 126–147. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126
35. V.Lawo, A.M.Philipp, S.Schuch, & I.Koch, (2012). The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1130–1137. doi:10.1037/a0027455
36. K.Z.H.Li, & K.Dupuis, (2008). Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task:Age, location, and time course effects. Acta Psychologica, 127, 416–427. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.006
37. G.D.Logan, & C.Bundesen, (2003). Clever homunculus:Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575–599. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
38. S.J.Lupker, (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485–495. doi:10.3758/BF03198265
39. C.P.May, L.Hasher, & M.J.Kane, (1999). The role of interference in memory span. Memory and Cognition, 27, 759–767. doi:10.3758/BF03198529
40. U.Mayr, (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets:The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96–109. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.96
41. U.Mayr, & S.W.Keele, (2000). Changing internal constraints on action:The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 129, 4–26. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
42. U.Mayr, & R.Kliegl, (2000). Task set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124–1140. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1124
43. U.Mayr, & R.Kliegl, (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362–372. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.362
44. U.Mayr, & T.Liebscher, (2001). Is there an age deficit in the selection of mental sets? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 47–69. doi:10.1080/09541440042000214
45. B.McElree, & B.A.Dosher, (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory:The time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 118, 346–373. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.346
46. N.Meiran, (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234–249. doi:10.1007/s004269900004
47. N.Meiran, A.Gotler, & A.Perlman, (2001). Old age is associated with a pattern of relatively intact and relatively impaired task-set switching abilities. The Journals of Gerontology:Series B, 56, 88–102. doi:10.1093/geronb/56.2.P88
48. R.F.I.Meuter, & A.Allport, (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming:Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2602
49. E.K.Miller, & J.D.Cohen, (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
50. S.Monsell, (1978). Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465–501. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90008-7
51. D.E.Nee, & J.Jonides, (2008). Neural correlates of access to short-term memory. PNAS, 105, 14228–14233. doi:10.1073/pnas.0802081105
52. D.A.Norman, & T.Shallice, (1986). Attention to action:Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R.J.Davidson, G.E.Schwartz, & D.Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation:Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–18). New York:Plenum.
53. K.Oberauer, (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory:A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 948–957. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.948
54. K.Oberauer, (2005). Binding and inhibition in working memory:Individual and age differences in short-term recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 134, 368–387. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.368
55. K.Oberauer, H.Süß, O.Wilhelm, & W.W.Wittman, (2003). The multiple faces of working memory:Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00115-0
56. L.Peterson, & M.J.Peterson, (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198. doi:10.1037/h0049234
57. C.Pettigrew, & R.C.Martin, (2014). Cognitive declines in healthy aging:Evidence from multiple aspects of interference resolution. Psychology and Aging, 29, 187–204. doi:10.1037/a0036085
58. S.Reimers, & E.A.Maylor, (2005). Task switching across the life span:Effects of age on general and specific switch costs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 661–671. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.661
59. R.D.Rogers, & S.Monsell, (1995). Costs of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 124, 207–231. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
60. O.Rubin, & N.Meiran, (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1477–1491. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1477
61. J.S.Rubinstein, D.E.Meyer, & J.E.Evans, (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.763
62. T.A.Salthouse, (1994). The aging of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 535–543. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.535
63. T.A.Salthouse, & R.L.Babcock, (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 763–776. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763
64. D.W.Schneider, & F.Verbruggen, (2008). Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1629–1640. doi:10.1080/17470210802138511
65. H.Schriefers, A.S.Meyer, & W.J.M.Levelt, (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production:Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
66. S.Schuch, & I.Koch, (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 30, 566–582. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.92
67. A.Spector, & I.Biederman, (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669–679. doi:10.2307/1421465
68. J.R.Stroop, (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
69. G.A.Tolan, & G.Tehan, (1999). Determinants of short-term forgetting:Decay, retroactive interference, or proactive interference? International Journal of Psychology, 34, 285–292. doi:10.1080/002075999399585
70. M.L.Turner, & R.W.Engle, (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
71. N.Unsworth, & R.W.Engle, (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity:Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
72. N.Unsworth, R.P.Heitz, J.C.Schrock, & R.W.Engle, (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505. doi:10.3758/BF03192720
73. A.Vandierendonck, B.Liefooghe, & F.Verbruggen, (2010). Task switching:Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626. doi:10.1037/a0019791
74. P.Verhaeghen, & C.Basak, (2005). Ageing and switching of the focus of attention in working memory:Results from a modified N-back task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 134–154. doi:10.1080/02724980443000241
75. P.Verhaeghen, & J.Cerella, (2002). Aging, executive control, and attention:A review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 26, 849–857. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00071-4
76. C.Wasylyshyn, P.Verhaeghen, & M.J.Sliwinski, (2011). Aging and task switching:A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 26, 15–20. doi:10.1037/a0020912
77. F.Waszak, B.Hommel, & A.Allport, (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming:Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
78. D.Wechsler, (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale – Revised. New York, NY:The Psychological Corporation.
79. D.Wechsler, (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-III. San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation.
80. G.Wylie, & A.Allport, (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Psychological Research, 63, 212–233. doi:10.1007/s004269900003
81. N.Yeung, & S.Monsell, (2003). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity:The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 29, 455–469. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.455