Examining the Use of Direct Behavior Rating on Formative Assessment of Class-Wide Engagement: A Case Study

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 224-230

  Riley Tillman, T Chris ^a   Methe, Scott A ^a   Weegar, Kathryn ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

classwide assessment; classwide intervention; direct behavior rating; formative assessment; social behavior assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990339241     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1534508409333879     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford.
3. Chafouleas, S.M., McDougal, J.L., Riley-Tillman, T.C., Panahon, C.J., & Hilt, A.M. (2005). What do Daily Behavior Report Cards (DBRCs) measure? An initial comparison of DBRCs with direct observation for off-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 669–676.
4. Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Sassu, K.A. (2006). Acceptability and reported use of Daily Behavior Report Cards among teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 174–182.
5. Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., Sassu, K.A., LaFrance, M.J., & Patwa, S.S. (2007). The consistency of Daily Behavior Report Cards in monitoring interventions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 30–37.
6. Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Sugai, G. (2007). School-based behavior assessment and monitoring for informing instruction and intervention. New York: Guilford.
7. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
8. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). A framework for building capacity for responsiveness to intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 621–626.
9. Hintze, J.M. (2005). Psychometrics of direct observation. School Psychology Review, 34, 507–519.
10. Hintze, J.M., & Matthews, W.J. (2004). The generalizability of SDOs across time and setting: A preliminary investigation of the psychometrics of behavioral observation. School Psychology Review, 33, 258–270.
11. Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
12. Horner, R.H., & Sugai, G. (2001). “Data” need not be a four-letter word: Using data to improve schoolwide discipline. Beyond Behavior, 11, 20–22.
13. Irvin, L.K., Horner, R.H., Ingram, K., Todd, A.W., Sugai, G., Sampson, N.K., et al. (2006). Using discipline referral data for decision making about student behavior in elementary and middle schools: An empirical evaluation of validity. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 10–23.
14. Irvin, L.K., Tobin, T.J., Sprague, J.R., Sugai, G., & Vincent, C.G. (2004). Validity of discipline referral measures as indices of school-wide behavioral status and effects of school-wide behavioral interventions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12.
15. Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
16. Ma, H.H. (2006). An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification, 30, 598–617.
17. Methe, S.A., & Hintze, J.M. (2003). Evaluating teacher modeling as a strategy to improve silent reading. School Psychology Review, 32, 617–622.
18. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: Author.
19. Parker, R.I., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2007). Median-based overlap analysis for single case data: A second study. Behavior Modification, 30, 919–936.
20. Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Burns, M.K. (2009). Evaluating educational interventions: Single case design for measuring response to intervention. New York: Guilford.
21. Riley-Tillman, T.C., Chafouleas, S.M., Briesch, A.M., & Eckert, T.L. (2008). Daily behavior report cards and systematic direct observation: An investigation of the acceptability, reported training and use, and decision reliability among school psychologists. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 313–327.
22. Riley-Tillman, T.C., Chafouleas, S.M., Sassu, A., Chanese, J.A., & Glazer, A.D. (2008). An analysis of the agreement of daily behavior report cards (DBRCs) and direct observation data for both on-task and disruptive behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 136–143.
23. Shapiro, E.S. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
24. Sprague, J.R., Sugai, G., Horner, R.H., & Walker, H.M. (1999). Using discipline referral data to evaluate school-wide discipline and violence prevention interventions. Oregon School Studies Council Bulletin, 42, 1–17.