Daily Behavior report cards and systematic direct observation: An investigation of the acceptability, reported training and use, and decision reliability among school psychologists

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 313-327

  Riley Tillman, T Chris ^a   Chafouleas, Sandra M ^b   Briesch, Amy M ^b   Eckert, Tanya L ^c  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Daily behavior report cards; Direct behavior ratings; Social behavior assessment; Systematic direct observation

Indexed keywords

EID: 62749157570     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-008-9070-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. SM Chafouleas T Christ TC Riley-Tillman AM Briesch JAM Chanese 2007 Generalizability and dependability of Direct Behavior Ratings to measure social behavior of preschoolers School Psychology Review 36 63 79
2. SM Chafouleas JL [tmp] McDougal TC Riley-Tillman CJ Panahon AM Hilt 2005 What do Daily Behavior Report Cards (DBRCs) measure? An initial comparison of DBRCs with direct observation for off-task behavior Psychology in the Schools 42 669 676 10.1002/pits.20102
3. SM Chafouleas TC Riley-Tillman TL Eckert 2003 A comparison of school psychologists' acceptability, training, and use of Norm-referenced, Curriculum-Based, and Brief Experimental Analysis methods to assess reading School Psychology Review 32 272 281
4. SM Chafouleas TC Riley-Tillman KA Sassu 2006 Acceptability and reported use of Daily Behavior Report Cards among teachers Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 8 174 182 10.1177/10983007060080030601
5. Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Sugai, G. (2007b). School-based behavior assessment and monitoring for informing instruction and intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
6. SM Chafouleas TC Riley-Tillman KA Sassu MJ LaFrance SS Patwa 2007 The consistency of Daily Behavior Report Cards in monitoring interventions Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 9 30 37 10.1177/10983007070090010401
7. Curtis, M. J., Lopez, A. D., Batsche, G. M., & Smith, J. C. (2006, March). School psychology 2005: A national perspective. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Anaheim, CA.
8. TL Eckert JM Hintze ES Shapiro 1997 School psychologists' acceptability of behavioral and traditional assessment procedures for externalizing problem behaviors School Psychology Quarterly 12 150 169 10.1037/h0088956
9. TL Eckert JM Hintze ES Shapiro 1999 Development and refinement of a measure for assessing the acceptability of assessment methods: The Assessment Rating Profile-Revised Canadian Journal of School Psychology 15 21 42 10.1177/082957359901500103
10. LS Fuchs D Fuchs 2006 A framework for building capacity for responsiveness to intervention School Psychology Review 35 621 626
11. JM Hintze 2005 Psychometrics of direct observation School Psychology Review 34 507 519
12. JM Hintze WJ Matthews 2004 The generalizability of SDOs across time and setting: A preliminary investigation of the psychometrics of behavioral observation School Psychology Review 33 258 270
13. Macmann, G. M., & Barnett, D. W. (1999). Diagnostic decision-making in school psychology: Understanding and coping with uncertainty. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 519-548). New York: Wiley.
14. TC Riley-Tillman SM Chafouleas AM Briesch 2007 A school practitioner's guide to using Daily Behavior Report Cards to monitor interventions Psychology in the Schools 44 77 89 10.1002/pits.20207
15. TC Riley-Tillman SM Chafouleas A Sassu JA Chanese AD Glazer 2008 An analysis of the agreement of Daily Behavior Report Cards (DBRCs) and direct observation data for both on-task and disruptive behaviors Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 10 136 143
16. TC Riley-Tillman SM Kalberer SM Chafouleas 2005 Selecting the right tool for the job: A review of behavior monitoring tools used to assess student response to intervention California School Psychologist 10 81 91
17. Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
18. ES Shapiro PF Heick 2004 School psychologist assessment practices in the evaluation of students referred for social/behavioral/emotional problems Psychology in the Schools 41 551 561 10.1002/pits.10176
19. CA Stone 2001 Issues in data-based decision making in special education: Introduction to the special series School Psychology Review 30 463 465
20. AM VanDerHeyden P Snyder 2006 Integrating frameworks from early childhood intervention and school psychology to accelerate growth for all young children School Psychology Review 35 519 534