Translating institutional change - forest journals as diverse policy actors

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 70, Issue , 2016, Pages 172-180

  Peltomaa, Juha ^a   Hildén, Mikael ^a   Huttunen, Suvi ^a  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Forest media; Forest policy; Intermediaries; Lobbies; Narrative policy framework; Street level bureaucrats

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON; CONSERVATION;

FOREST MEDIA; FOREST POLICY; INTERMEDIARIES; LOBBIES; POLICY FRAMEWORK;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84989811987     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.029     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., Hardin, R., Changing governance of the world's forests. Science 320:5882 (2008), 1460–1462.
2. Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Doubleday, N., Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance. 2007, UBC Press, Vancouver, Toronto.
3. Arts, B., Buizer, M., Forests, discourses, institutions: a discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy Econ. 11:5–6 (2008), 340–347.
4. Atela, J.O., Quinn, C.H., Minang, P.A., Duguma, L.A., Houdet, J.A., Implementing REDD + at the national level: stakeholder engagement and policy coherences between REDD + rules and Kenya's sectoral policies. Forest Policy Econ. 65 (2016), 37–46.
5. Baumgartner, F.R., Jones, B.D., Agendas and instability in American politics. 1993, University of Chicago Press.
6. Bouwen, R., Taillieu, T., Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. J. Community Appl. Psychol. 14 (2004), 137–153.
7. Brewer, P.L., Gross, K., Studying the effects of framing on public opinion about policy issues: does what we see depend on how we look?. D'Angelo, P., Kuypers, J.A., (eds.) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, 2010, Routledge, New York, NY, 159–186.
8. Brodkin, E.Z., Policy work: street-level organizations under new managerialism. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 21:Suppl. 2 (2011), i253–i277.
9. Brodkin, E.Z., Putting street-level organizations first: new directions for social policy and management research. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 21:Suppl. 2 (2011), i199–i201.
10. Davis, E.J., Gwin, L., Moseley, C., Gosnell, H., Burright, H., Beer, beef, and boards: the role of intermediaries in payment for ecosystem services arrangements in northwestern Montana. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 58 (2015), 1562–1576.
11. Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., Cronin, T., Muharrom, E., Santoso, L., Mardiah, S., Büdenbender, M., Equity and REDD + in the media: a comparative analysis of policy discourses. Ecol. Soc.: J. Integrative Sci. Resilience Sustain., 18, 2013 (xx-xx).
12. Edwards, A., Scientific expertise and policy-making: the intermediary role of the public sphere. Sci. Public Policy 26 (1999), 163–170.
13. Entman, R.R.M., Framing media power. D'Angelo, P., Kuypers, J.A., (eds.) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, 2010, Routledge, New York, NY, 331–355.
14. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Metsätilastotiedote 16/2013 (Trans.) Ownership of forests 2011, 2013, Metsämaan omistus 2011, Vantaa.
15. Frandsen, F., Johansen, W., Organizations, stakeholders, and intermediaries: towards a general theory. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 9 (2015), 253–271.
16. Friedman, A.L., Miles, S., Stakeholders: theory and practice. 2006, Oxford University Press.
17. Habermas, J., Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Commun. Theory 16 (2006), 411–426.
18. Hajer, M.A., Authoritative governance. Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization, 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Hänninen, H., Karppinen, H., Leppänen, J., Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2010 [Finnish Forest Owner 2010]. Metlan työraportteja 208, 2011, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa.
20. Hiedanpää, J., Kotilainen, J., Salo, M., Unfolding the organised irresponsibility: ecosystem approach and the guest for forest biodiversity in Finland, Peru and Russia. Forest Policy Econ. 13 (2011), 159–165.
21. Howells, J., Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Res. Policy 35 (2006), 715–728.
22. Howlett, M., Public managers as the missing variable in policy studies: an empirical investigation using Canadian data. Rev. Policy Res. 28 (2011), 247–263.
23. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15 (2005), 1277–1288.
24. Hupe, P., Buffat, A., A public service gap: capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Manag. Rev. 16 (2014), 548–569.
25. Huttunen, S., Stakeholder frames in the making of forest bioenergy legislation in Finland. Geoforum 53 (2014), 63–73.
26. Jones, M.D., McBeth, M.K., A narrative policy framework: clear enough to be wrong?. Policy Stud. J. 38:2 (2010), 329–353.
27. Jones, M.D., McBeth, M.K., Shanahan, E.A., Introducing the narrative policy framework. Jones, M., Shanahan, E., McBeth, M., (eds.) The Science of Stories, 2014, Palgrave Macmillan US, 1–25.
28. Kim, Y.S., Bae, J.S., Fisher, L.A., Latifah, S., Afifi, M., Lee, S.M., Kim, I.A., Indonesia's forest management units: effective intermediaries in REDD + implementation?. Forest Policy Econ. 62 (2016), 69–77.
29. Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C., Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 76:6 (2009), 849–860.
30. Kotilainen, J., Rytteri, T., Transformation of forest policy regimes in Finland since the 19th century. J. Hist. Geogr. 37:4 (2011), 429–439.
31. Lemos, M.C., Agrawal, A., Environmental governance. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31:1 (2006), 297–325.
32. Lipsky, M., Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. 1980, Russel Sage Foundation, New York.
33. Lowery, D., Why do organized interests lobby? A multi-goal, multi-context theory of lobbying. Polity 39 (2007), 29–54.
34. McCormick, K., Kautto, N., The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability 5 (2013), 2589–2608.
35. McFarland, A.S., Public interest lobbies: decision making on energy. 1976, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy research, Washington.
36. Medd, W., Marvin, S., Making water work: intermediating between regional strategy and local practice. Soc. Space 26 (2008), 280–299.
37. Meyer, M., Kearnes, M., Introduction to special section: intermediaries between science, policy and the market. Sci. Public Policy 40 (2013), 423–429.
38. Moss, T., Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition. Environ. Plann. A 41 (2009), 1480–1495.
39. Moss, T., Medd, T., Guy, S., Marvin, S., Organising water: the hidden role of intermediary work. Water Altern. 2 (2009), 16–33.
40. Ollonqvist, P., Collaboration in the forest policy arena in Finland – from neocorporatist planning to participatory programme preparation. Gislerud, E., Neven, I., (eds.) National Forest Programmes in a European Context, 2002, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, 27–48.
41. Olson, M., A theory of the incentives facing political organizations neo-corporatism and the hegemonic state. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 7 (1986), 165–189.
42. Park, M.S., The dual role of the media in environmental communication as a public sphere and as political actors. For. Sci. Technol. 9 (2013), 33–38.
43. Rametsteiner, E., Governance concepts and their application in forest policy initiatives from global to local levels. Small-scale For. 8 (2009), 143–158.
44. Shanahan, E.A., McBeth, M.K., Hathaway, P.L., Arnell, R.J., Conduit or contributor? The role of media in policy change theory. Policy. Sci. 41 (2008), 115–138.
45. Shanahan, E.A., McBeth, M.K., Hathaway, P.L., Narrative policy framework: the influence of media policy narratives on public opinion. Polit. Policy 39 (2011), 373–400.
46. Siiskonen, H., The conflict between traditional and scientific forest management in 20th century Finland. For. Ecol. Manag. 249 (2007), 125–133.
47. Smith Maguire, J., Matthews, J., Cultural intermediaries and the media. Sociol. Compass 4:7 (2010), 405–416.
48. Sternlieb, F., Bixler, R.P., Huber-Stearns, H., Huayhuac, C., A question of fit: reflections on boundaries, organizations and social-ecological systems. J. Environ. Manag. 130 (2013), 117–125.
49. Tummers, L.G., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy and the importance of discretion. Public Manag. Rev. 16 (2014), 527–547.
50. Waldherr, A., The mass media as actors in innovation systems. Bauer, J., Lang, A., Schneider, V., (eds.) Innovation Policy and Governance in High-Tech Industries, 2012, Springer, Berlin, 77–100.
51. Wolf, S., Primmer, E., Between incentives and action: a pilot study of biodiversity conservation competencies for multifunctional forest management in Finland. Soc. Nat. Resour. 19 (2006), 845–861.