Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2011, Pages

  Brodkin, Evelyn Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953699660     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muq093     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adler, Michael. Forthcoming. Conditionality, sanctions and the effective absence of redress in the British New Deal Programmes. In Work and the welfare state: The politics and management of policy change, ed. E. Brodkin and Marston G. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2. Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
3. Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
4. Behn, R. D., and P. A. Kant. 1999. Strategies for avoiding the pitfalls of performance contracting. Public Productivity and Management Review 22:470-89.
5. Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 1986. The false promise of administrative reform: Implementing quality control in welfare. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press.
6. Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 1990. Implementation as policy politics. In Implementation and the policy process: Opening up the black box, ed. D. Palumbo and D. Calista, 107-31. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
7. Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 1997. Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review 71:1-33.
8. Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 2003. Street-level research: Policy at the front lines. In Policy into action: Implementation research and welfare reform, ed. T. Corbett and M. C. Lennon. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
9. Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 2007. Bureaucracy redux: Management reformism and the welfare state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (1): 1-17.
10. Brodkin, Evelyn Z., Carolyn Fuqua, and Elaine Waxman. 2005. Accessing the safety net: Administrative barriers to public benefits in metropolitan Chicago. A Report of the Public Benefits Hotline Research Project. Chicago, IL: Sargent Shriver National Center for Poverty Law and the Legal Assistance Foundation of Metropolitan Chicago.
11. Brodkin, Evelyn Z., and Malay Majmundar. 2010. Administrative exclusion: The hidden costs of welfare claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 827-48.
12. Cawley, John, James Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil. 1999. On policies to reward the value added by educators. Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (4): 720-27.
13. Considine, Mark. 2005. The reform that never ends: Quasi-markets and employment services in Australia.In Contractualism in employment services: A new form of welfare state governance, ed. E. Sol and M. Westerveld, 41-71. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
14. Denhardt, Robert, and Janice V. Denhardt. 2000. The new public service: Service rather than steering. Public Administration Review 60:549-59.
15. Denzin, Norman K. 1989. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Diller, Matthew. 2000. The revolution in welfare administration: Rules, discretion, and entrepreneurial government. New York University Law Review 75:1121-220.
17. Edin, Kathryn, and Laura Lein. 1997. Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and lowwage work. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Elmore, Richard F. 1979-1980. Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly 94:601-16.
19. Felstiner, William E F., Richard L. Abel, and Austin Sarat. 1980-1981. The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, and claiming. Law and Society Review 15:631-54.
20. Frederickson, H. George. 1996. Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review 56:263-70. (Pubitemid 126421577)
21. Handler, Joel F., and Yeheskel Hasenfeld. 1991. The moral construction of poverty: Welfare reform in America. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Hasenfeld, Yeheskel. 2000. Organizational forms as moral practices: The case of welfare departments. Social Service R 74 (3): 329-51.
23. Haskins, Ron. 2002. Ending entitlements works for the poor. Philanthropy 16 (3): 15-9.
24. Heckman, James, Carolyn Heinrich, and Jeffrey Smith. 1997. Assessing the performance of performance standards in public bureaucracies. American Economic Review 87:389-95. (Pubitemid 127453054)
25. Henly, Julia R., and Susan Lambert. 2006. Nonstandard work and child-care needs of low-income parents. In Work, family, health, and well-being, ed. S. Bianchi, L. Casper, and R. King, 473-92. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
26. Henly, Julia R., H. L. Shaefer, and R. E. Waxman. 2006. Nonstandard work schedules: Employer- vs. employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs. Social Service Review 80:609-34. (Pubitemid 44932561)
27. Hou, Yilin, Donald P. Moynihan, and Patricia W. Ingraham. 2003. Capacity, management and performance: Exploring the links. American Review of Public Administration 33:295-315. (Pubitemid 38582809)
28. Kerr, Steven. 1975. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal 18:769-83.
29. Lambert, Susan. 2009. Making a difference for hourly employees. In Work-life policies that make a real difference for individuals, families, and organizations, ed. A. Booth and A. Crouter, 169-95, Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
30. Larsen, Flemming. Forthcoming. Active labour market reform in Denmark: The role of governance in policy change. In Work and the welfare state: the politics and management of policy change, ed. E. Brodkin and G. Marston. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31. Lawton, A., D. McKevitt, and M. Millar. 2000. Coping with ambiguity: Reconciling external legitimacy and organizational implementation in performance measurement. Public Money and Management 13:19.
32. Lens, V. 2005. Bureaucratic disentitlement after welfare reform: Are fair hearings the cure? Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy 12 (1): 13-54.
33. Lens, Vicki, and Susan E. Vorsanger. 2005. Complaining after claiming: Fair hearings after welfare reform. Social Service Review 79:430-53. (Pubitemid 41622786)
34. Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of individuals in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
35. Lurie, Irene. 2006. At the front lines of the welfare system: A perspective on the decline in welfare caseloads. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
36. Lynn, Laurence E., Jr. 2001. The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review 60 (2): 144-60. (Pubitemid 33604253)
37. Maynard-Moody, Steven, and Michael Musheno. 2003. Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan.
38. McDonald, Catherine, and Gregory Marston. 2002. Patterns of governance: The curious case of non-profit community services in Australia. Social Policy and Administration 36 (4): 376-91. (Pubitemid 34842487)
39. McGuire, Linda. 2004. Counting quality or qualities that count? An inquiry into performance reporting for public services in Australia. PhD diss., Monash Univ.
40. Merton, Robert K. 1957. Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
41. Miller, Gale. 1983. Holding clients accountable: The micro-politics of trouble in a work incentive program. Social Problems 31:139-51.
42. Moynihan, Donald, and Pamela Herd. 2010. Red tape and democracy: How rules affect citizenship rights. American Review of Public Administration 40 (6): 654-70.
43. Picci, Lucio. 2011. Reputation-based governance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
44. Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the welfare state: Reagan, thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
45. Price, David. 2003. Outcome-based tyranny: Teaching compliance while testing like a state. Anthropological Q 76 (4): 715-30. (Pubitemid 37469201)
46. Radin, Beryl. 2006. Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
47. Sol, Els, and Mies Westerveld, eds. 2005. Contractualism in employment services: A new form of welfare state governance. The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
48. Soss, Joe. 2000. Unwanted claims: The politics of participation in the U.S. welfare system. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.
49. Soss, J., S. Schram, and R. Fording. 2011. The organization of discipline: From performance management to perversity and punishment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(Supp 2).
50. Steiner, Gilbert. 1971. The state of welfare. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
51. Stone, Deborah. 1984. The disabled state. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press.
52. Van Berkel, Rik. Forthcoming. Triple activation: Introducing welfare to work into Dutch Social Assistance. In Work and the welfare state: The politics and management of policy change, ed. E. Brodkin and G. Marston. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
53. Van Slyke, David M. 2003. The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review 63:296-315. (Pubitemid 37306781)
54. Van Thiel, Sandra, and Frans Leeuw. 2002. The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance and Management Review 25:267-81.
55. Watkins-Hayes, Celeste. 2011. Race, poverty, and policy implementation: inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(Supp 2).
56. Weaver, Kent. 2000. Ending welfare as we know it. Washington, DC: Brookings.
57. Wichowsky, Amber, and Donald Moynihan. 2008. Measuring how performance measurement shapes citizenship: A policy feedback perspective on performance measurement. Public Administration Review 68:908-20.
58. Zatz, Noah. 2006. What welfare requires from work. UCLA Law Review 54:373-464.