Between incentives and action: A pilot study of biodiversity conservation competencies for multifunctional forest management in Finland

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 845-861

  Wolf, Steven A ^a   Primmer, Eeva ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Coevolution; Competencies; Finland; Forestry; Innovation; Multifunctionality; Organizational capabilities; Strategic management

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 33747609580     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920600835601     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allaire, G. and S.Wolf. 1999. Collective goods and accountability in technical information systems. Unpublished manuscript, France: INRA-Toulouse.
2. Allaire, G. and S.Wolf. 2004. Cognitive models and institutional hybridity in agrofood innovation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 29 (4): 431-458. [CSA]
3. Buttel, F. 2003. Environmental sociology and the explanation of environmental reform. Organization Environ. 16 (3): 306-344. [CSA][CROSSREF]
4. Dryzek, J. 1997. The politics of the earth. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Freudenburg, W. and D. Fisher. 2001. Ecological modernization and its critics: Assessing the past and looking toward the future. Society Nat. Resources 14: 701-709. [CSA][CROSSREF]
6. Frickel, S. and K. Moore, eds. 2006. The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Hall, J. and H. Vredenberg. 2003. The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 45 (1): 61-68. [CSA]
8. Hart, S. 1995. A natural-resource based view of the firm. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20 (4): 986-1014. [CSA][CROSSREF]
9. Helming, K. and H. Wiggering. 2003. Sustainable development of multifunctional landscapes. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. Karppinen, H. 1998. Objectives of non-industrial private forest owners: Differences and future trends in southern and northern Finland. J. For. Econ. 4 (2): 147-174. [CSA]
11. Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö. 2002. Metsänomistajien neuvonnan kilpailuttaminen. [Enabling competition in advisory service provision to forest owners]. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
12. McKelvey, M. 1998. Evolutionary innovations: Learning, entrepreneurship, and the dynamics of the firm. J. Evol. Econ. 8 (2): 157-175. [CSA][CROSSREF]
13. Mol, A. and D. Sonnenfeld. 2000. Ecological modernization around the world: An introduction. Environ. Polit. 9 (1): 3-16. [CSA]
14. Nohria, N. and R.Eccles. 1992. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
15. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Sci. 51: 14-37. [CSA]
16. Norgaard, R. 1994. The coevolution of economic and environmental systems. In Evolutionary concepts in contemporary economics, ed. R.England, 213-225. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2003. Voluntary approaches for environmental policy. Paris: OECD.
18. Pfeffer, J. and G.Salancik. 2003. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Rantala, T. and E. Primmer. 2003. Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders' rhetoric in Finland. Environ. Sci. Policy 6 (3): 205-216. [CSA][CROSSREF]
20. Rosenberg, N. 1982. Learning by using. In Inside the black box: Technology and economics, ed. N.Rosenberg, 120-140. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Savage, D. A. 1994. The professions in theory and history: The case of pharmacy. Business Econ. Hist. 23 (2): 129-160. [CSA]
22. Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.
23. Teece, D., ed. 1987. The competitive challenge. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strat. Manage. J. 5 (2): 171-180. [CSA]
25. Wolf, S. 2006. Commercial restructuring of collective resources in agrofood systems of innovation. In The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power, eds. S.Frickel and K.Moore, 91-121. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
26. Yin, R. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Zahra, S. A. and G. George. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Acad. Manage. Rev. 279 (2): 185-203. [CSA]