Improving Screening Mammography Outcomes Through Comparison with Multiple Prior Mammograms

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 207, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 918-924

  Hayward, Jessica H ^a   Ray, Kimberly M ^a   Wisner, Dorota J ^b   Kornak, John ^a   Lin, Weiwen ^c   Joe, Bonnie N ^a   Sickles, Edward A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b San Rafael Medical Center   (United States)

^c LCC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer detection; Mammography; Recall rate; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPEAT PROCEDURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 84989183004     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15917     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Feig SA. Screening mammography beneft controversies: sorting the evidence. Radiol Clin North Am 2014; 52:455-480
2. Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankas-kas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DI. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155:481-492
3. Welch HG, Passow HJ. Quantifying the benefts and harms of screening mammography. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:448-454
4. United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Breast cancer: screening. USPSTF website. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Topic/recommendation-summary/breast-cancer-screening. Published 2009. Accessed May 23, 2016
5. Bassett LW, Shayestehfar B, Hirbawi I. Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison: useful-ness and costs. AJR 1994; 163:1083-1086
6. Frankel SD, Sickles EA, Curpen BN, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB. Initial versus subse-quent screening mammography: comparison of fndings and their prognostic signifcance. AJR 1995; 164:1107-1109
7. Wilson TE, Nijhawan VK, Helvie MA. Normal mammograms and the practice of obtaining previous mammograms: usefulness and costs. Radiology 1996; 198:661-663
8. Callaway M P, Boggis CRM, Astley SA, Hutt I. The influence of previous flms on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:527-529
9. Thurfjell MG, Vitak B, Azavedo E, Svane G, Thurfjell E. Effect on sensitivity and specifcity of mam mogra-phy screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. Acta Radiol 2000; 41:52-56
10. Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE. Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. AJR 2002; 179:1173-1177
11. Roelofs AA, Karssemeijer N, Wedekind N, et al. Im-portance of comparison of current and prior mam-mograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 2007; 242:70-77
12. Yankaskas BC, May RC, Matuszewski J, Bowling JM, Jarman M P, Schroeder BF. Effect of observing change from comparison mammograms on performance of screening mammography in alarge community-based population. Radiology 2011; 261:762-770
13. Sickles EA, D'Orsi CJ. ACR BI-RADS follow-up and outcome monitoring. In: D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al., eds. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013
14. Yankaskas BC, Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, et al. As-sociation between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. Radiology 2005; 234:363-373
15. Leung J W, Sickles EA. Developing asymmetry identifed on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic fndings. AJR 2007; 188:667-675
16. Feig SA. Age-related accuracy of screening mam-mography: how should it be measured? Radiology 2000; 214:633-640
17. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al., eds. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2012. Na-tional Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program website. seer.cancer. gov/csr/1975-2012/. Published April 2015. Accessed June 1, 2016
18. Sumkin JH, Holbert BL, Herrmann JS, et al. Opti-mal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination. AJR 2003; 180:343-346