Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 179, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1173-1177

  Burnside, Elizabeth S ^a   Sickles, Edward A ^a   Sohlich, Rita E ^a   Dee, Katherine E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 0036838971     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791173     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Frankel SD, Sickles EA. Curpen BN. Sollitto RA. Ominsky SH, Galvin HB. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance, AJR 1995;164:1107-1109
2. Callaway MP. Boggis CRM. Astley SA. Hutt I. The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1997:52:527-529
3. Thurfjell MG, Vitak B, Azavedo E. Svane G, Thurfjell E. Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. Acta Radiol 2000;41:52-56
4. Pamilo M. Anttinen I, Soiva M, Roiha M, Suramo I. Mammography screening: reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall in the Finnish system. Clin Radiol 1990:41:384-387
5. Robinson JI. Crane CE, King JM, Scarce DI, Hoffmann CE. The South Australian Breast X-Ray Service: results from a statewide mammographic screening programme. Br J Cancer 1996;73:837-842
6. Blanks RG. Wallis MG, Moss SM. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme. J Med Screen 1998:5:195-201
7. Tabár L. Gad A. Holmberg L, Ljungquist U. Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer: results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden, Diagn Imaging Clin Med 1985;54:158-164
8. Tabár L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE, Gad A, Gröntoft O. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:187-210
9. Libstug AR, Moravan V, Aitken SE. Results from the Ontario breast screening program, 1990-1995. J Med Screen 1998;5:73-80
10. Dee KE, Sickles EA. Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently. AJR 2001;176:729-733
11. Robertson CL. A private breast imaging practice: medical audit of 25,788 screening and 1,077 diagnostic examinations. Radiology 1993;187:75-79
12. Sickles EA. The usefulness of computers in man-aging the operation of a mammography screening practice. AJR 1990;155:755-761
13. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998
14. American Joint Committee on Cancer, Manual for staging of cancer, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott. 1997