The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma

Brain and Language

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 527-529

  Callaway, M P ^a,c   Boggis, C R M ^a   Astley, S A ^b   Hutt, I ^b  

^a WITHINGTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 23744494040     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80329-7     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Nemoto T, Natarajan N, Smart CR, Mettlin C, Murphy GP. Patterns of breast cancer detection in the United States. Journal of Surgical Oncology 1982;21:183-188.
2. UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group. First results on mortality reduction in the UK trial of early detection of breast cancer. Lancet 1988;ii:411-416.
3. Working Group chaired by Professor Sir Patrick Forrest. Breast cancer screening: report to the Health Ministers of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1986.
4. Metz CE, Kronman HB, Wang PL, Shen JL. ROCFIT: a modified maximum likelihood algorithm for estimating a binominal ROC curve from confidence rating data. Chicago: University of Chicago.
5. Berbaum KS, Dorfman DD, Franken EA. Measuring observer performance by ROC analysis indications and complications. Investigative Radiology 1989;24:228-233.
6. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Investigative Radiology 1989; 24:234-245.