Why enumeration matters

Michigan Law Review

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-46

  Primus, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989166034     PISSN: 00262234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Pamela S. Karlan, The Supreme Court, 2011 Term-Foreword: Democracy and Disdain, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 42-43 (2012)
2. Gil Seinfeld, Article I, Article III, and the Limits of Enumeration, 108 Mich. L. Rev. 1389, 1391 (2010)
3. Richard Primus, The Limits of Enumeration, 124 Yale L.J. 576, 596-604 2014
4. Laurence H. Tribe, American Constitutional Law 794-95 (3d ed. 2000).
5. Bradford R. Clark, Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Federalism, 79 Tex. L. Rev. 1321, 1328-31, 1339-42 (2001).
6. Bradford R. Clark, Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Federalism, 79 Tex. L. Rev. 1321, XV, 1339-42 (2001)
7. Randy E. Barnett, We the People: Each and Every One, 123 Yale L.J. 2576, 2589 (2014)
8. Randy E. Barnett, We the People: Each and Every One, 123 Yale L.J. 2576, 2600 (2014)
9. Randy E. Barnett, We the People: Each and Every One, 123 Yale L.J. 2576, 2609 (2014).
10. Adam B. Cox & Cristina M. Rodríguez, The President and Immigration Law, 119 Yale L.J. 458, 469 (2009)
11. John F. Manning, Federalism and the Generality Problem in Constitutional Interpretation, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 2003, 2004 (2009)
12. Gillian E. Metzger, Congress, Article IV, and Interstate Relations, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1468, 1513 (2007)
13. Jamal Greene, On the Origins of Originalism, 88 Tex. L. Rev. 1 (2009)
14. Philip Bobbitt, Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution (1982)
15. Donald H. Regan, How to Think About the Federal Commerce Power and Incidentally Rewrite United States v. Lopez, 94 Mich. L. Rev. 554, 556 (1995).
16. Kurt T. Lash, The Sum of All Delegated Power: A Response to Richard Primus, The Limits of Enumeration, 124 Yale L.J. F. 180, 204 (2014)
17. Kurt T. Lash, The Sum of All Delegated Power: A Response to Richard Primus, The Limits of Enumeration, 124 Yale L.J. F. 180, 579 (2014)
18. Larry Kramer, Understanding Federalism, 47 Vand. L. Rev. 1485, 1492, 1515-20 (1994)
19. Richard Primus, The Gibbons Fallacy 19 U. Pa. J. Const. L. (forthcoming 2017)
20. A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 39-40 (10th ed. 1959) (1885).
21. Yann Allard-Tremblay, Proceduralism, Judicial Review and the Refusal of Royal Assent, 33 Oxford J. of Legal Stud. 379, 379 (2013)
22. Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution 48 (Paul Smith ed., Cambridge Univ. Press 2001)
23. Richard J.A. Talbert, The Senate of Imperial Rome 354 (1984).
24. James F. McCue, The Doctrine of Transubstantiation from Berengar Through Trent: The Point at Issue, 61 Harv. Theological Rev. 385 (1968).
25. Mishael Zion & Noam Zion, A Night to Remember: The Haggadah of Contemporary Voices 136 (2007).
26. Michigan Football Traditions, MGoBlue.com, http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/021910aad.html [https://perma.cc/88SH-X8MX]
27. Michigan Football Traditions, MGoBlue.com, http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/021910aad.html [https://perma.cc/88SH-X8MX] 567
28. Michigan Football Traditions, MGoBlue.com, http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/021910aad.html [https://perma.cc/88SH-X8MX] 2591
29. Michigan Football Traditions, MGoBlue.com, http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/021910aad.html [https://perma.cc/88SH-X8MX] 2648
30. Samuel R. Bagenstos, The Anti-Leveraging Principle and the Spending Clause After NFIB, 101 Geo. L.J. 861 (2013)
31. Samuel R. Bagenstos, The Anti-Leveraging Principle and the Spending Clause After NFIB, 101 Geo. L.J. 2651 (2013)
32. Abbe R. Gluck, Federalism from Federal Statutes: Health Reform, Medicaid, and the Old-Fashioned Federalists’ Gamble, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 1749 (2013)
33. Abbe R. Gluck, Our [National] Federalism, 123 Yale L.J. 1996 (2014)
34. Roderick M. Hills Jr., The Political Economy of Cooperative Federalism: Why State Autonomy Makes Sense and “Dual Sovereignty” Doesn’t, 96 Mich. L. Rev. 813, 868-70 (1998)
35. Jessica Bulman-Pozen & Heather K. Gerken, Uncooperative Federalism, 118 Yale L.J. 1256 (2009).
36. Jessica Bulman-Pozen & Heather K. Gerken, Uncooperative Federalism, 118 Yale L.J. 1256 (2009)
37. Jessica Bulman-Pozen & Heather K. Gerken, Uncooperative Federalism, 118 Yale L.J. 1256 (2009)
38. Thomas M. Cooley, A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations Which Rest upon the Legislative Power of the United States of the American Union 125-26 (The Lawbook Exch., Ltd. 1999) (1868).
39. Ernest Young, Federalism as a Constitutional Principle, 83 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1057, 1064 (2015)
40. William Ewald, The Committee of Detail, 28 Const. Comment. 197 (2012)
41. Mark A. Graber, Enumeration and Other Constitutional Strategies for Protecting Rights: The View from 1787/1791, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 357, 372-77 (2007)
42. Michael J. Klarman, The Founding Revisited, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 544, 560-61 (2011)
43. Michael J. Klarman, The Founding Revisited, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 544, 2676-77 (2011)
44. Robert Hazell et al., Inst. for Gov’t, Making Minority Government Work 6, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/147.pdf [https://perma.cc/8C5V-NBK8].
45. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F]
46. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F] 2
47. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F] 56
48. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F] 16
49. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F] 12
50. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F]
51. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F] 13-14
52. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F] 21-22
53. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F]
54. Robert Booth, Secret Papers Show Extent of Senior Royals’ Veto over Bills, Guardian (Jan. 14, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills [https://perma.cc/GZ6M-4U9F] 21-22
55. Rights of the Sovereign and the Duchy of Cornwall Bill [HL] 2013-2014, UK Parliament, http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2013-14/rightsofthesovereignandtheduchyofcornwall.html [https://perma.cc/4GG4-MZ5A]
56. Rights of the Sovereign and the Duchy of Cornwall Bill [HL] 2013-2014, UK Parliament, http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2013-14/rightsofthesovereignandtheduchyofcornwall.html [https://perma.cc/4GG4-MZ5A] 50